Ad Fontes! Doctrine

October 31st, 2013 Post by

When I was in the ELCA, as a pastor in Hudson County, NJ,  our urban coalition of Lutheran parishes (Hudson Evangelical Lutheran Parish or HELP) had weekly Bible studies.  Usually three of us more confessionally minded pastors would go afterwards for lunch and beers to de-tox after the virulent liberals held sway with their implicit and explicit denials of the faith and practice of the Lutheran Church.  One week it was the study for Holy Trinity Sunday and a woman pastor sniffed that morning, “The only day of the year we celebrate a doctrine”. Even then, I could not help wonder, what’s wrong with that?!  My parents taught me right from wrong and I have quite happy over that doctrine.  I need Christ’s doctrine every day. I learned Jesus Christ by the faithful preaching of LCMS pastors growing up and I celebrate the “sound doctrine”.

On Reformation Day and regarding the Reformation itself on October 31st, though, we seem to be agreeing with the woman pastor. We are primarily celebrating the Reformer, rather than the reformation and it’s Doctrine.   We should be celebrating a doctrine rather than a man, that is, Luther.  The day we should be celebrating as the beginning of the Reformation is June 25th, when in 1530, the Augsburg Confession was presented to His Serene Majesty, Emperor Charles V. As Pr. Todd Wilkin pointed out on his blog, the 95 Theses were still quite Roman.  Our hero worship of Luther as the “Saxon Hercules” does not does honor and praise for those many, known and not known, with whom Luther stood.  As a saint, Luther did not act alone, as he was in the baptized communion of the saints.  Those electors and princes were risking much that day in 1530. It was not and is not only “here I stand”, but “Here we stand”.

One comic book I read multiple times was one on the story of Martin Luther, probably by Concordia Publishing House.  I thought the panel showing the tonsured Luther laying on the stone floor being ordained about as scary as a zombie on Halloween.  I loved watching the black and white Luther movie…and still do.  Please understand: Luther was a hero for me.  We sure do need heroes.  On the eve of All Saints, though, it is better to call Luther a baptized saint and confessor, than a hero.  He and the blessed Confessors did not want to point to themselves, but Jesus Christ.  The painting above by Lucas Cranach is a fine  and precise portrayal of the reformation.  We celebrate the saving doctrine of Christ, Luther knew he did not save.

I thought of this re-reading portions of Hermann Sasse’s  Here We Stand in which he goes through the various interpretations of the Reformation and shows how they fall short.  The first one Sasse tackled was “The Heroic Interpretation of the Reformer”.  He wrote that this kind of historical understanding arose in the 19th century with the idea that great men form the course of history and Luther fits the bill.  It was further reinforced by the fact  that even in the time of Luther, followers of ‘his’ doctrine were being called “Lutherans”. Sasse cites the important quote from Dr. Luther:

  “How should I, poor, stinking carcass that I am, come to have the children of Christ call themselves by my dreadful name?  Not so, dear friends;  let us do away with party names and call ourselves Christians after Him whose teachings we have.”

At the end of the chapter on the heroic interpretation, Prof. Sasse, writing in 1938, had a pointed critique which is still relevant in our day and for your contemplation.  He wrote that

 “…hero worship, or founder worship, inheres in the nature of the Lutheran Church simply because our church is the only one of the larger churches in Christendom which bears the name of a man. The truth of the matter is that it is only when the Evangelical Lutheran Church is in a manifest state of decline that such an extravagant veneration of Luther asserts itself. The nineteenth century, with its modern historical interpretation and its worship of heroes, introduced these fulsome laudations of the German Reformer to which Luther himself would have replied so vigorously that the genius cult of these eulogists would have disappeared once and for all. The more Luther’s teachings fade from the consciousness of the church, so much the more foolishly the cult of his person is promoted. And the more the people are told, in bombastic and mendacious jubilee addresses, about the “Hero of Worms,” the “Warrior of God,” and whatever else the figures and symbols might be which are drawn from the chamber of Luther-anniversary-horrors, so much the more are these people es­tranged from the Reformation. The Protestant churches which have tolerated and even fostered this practice really have no right to com­plain about their fate. The Lutheran Church of the first two centuries did not have all the means which we possess to understand Luther and to acquaint others with his life and thought. Their knowledge of the Reformer’s life was altogether inadequate, and their editions of his works were imperfect and fragmentary. They knew nothing of the “young Luther.” All the treasures which have been made acces­sible to us in the last two generations were still unknown. Neverthe­less, the Lutheran Church existed even then. It was a vital and a living church. For, although it was still without a reliable picture of Luther’s development into a Reformer, it did have the teachings of the Refor­mation as a vital possession. And that, after all, was something!



Categories: Steadfast with the Confessions Tags:

Rules for comments on this site:

Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.

Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.

Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.

If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.

Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.

Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.

We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Jais H. Tinglund
    October 31st, 2013 at 11:42 | #1

    Nailed it.
    It seems to me that it is yet another symptom of the Gospel and its inevitable consequences (also known as Lutheran teaching and practice) being lost out of sight, when Reformation Day Services become celebrations of anything and everything somehow related to Luther and his thoughts on this or that topic, family, or prayer, or whatever (as I have seen it in worship services purchased from theologically shady publishers), rather than a celebration of the precious Gospel of salvation God restored to His Church through someone who happened to be called *Luther*, and by whose name the adversaries hereafter have insisted on referring to those faithful to the faith, until the faithful became used to having it applied to them, and began applying it to themselves , so that the name is now also being claimed by their unfaithful and apostate offspring, who have little to nothing in common with Luther in terms of the faith or the Biblical truth that attracted the world’s attention to him …
    That became a long sentence; time for a period, I guess.

  2. Rev. Robert Fischer (Emeritus)
    October 31st, 2013 at 20:33 | #2

    I agree that Reformation celebrations shouldn’t be just about Luther. However, in this day and age children have been taught from pre-school on about “Martin Luther King”. That’s the only Luther many of the children in our congregations know. They will certainly have heard the name “Luther” in church and Sunday School, but they don’t really know who he is, or just assume we’re talking about Martin Luther King. Don’t believe me? Ask some of the kids in your congregation who Martin Luther is, especially the kids who aren’t regular in church and Sunday School attendance (which is probably most of them).

    I think Reformation services (as all worship services) should be Christ-centered, but we can and should speak about Martin Luther’s discovery (or re-discovery, rather) of the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. And, it shouldn’t only be a once-a-year treatment of Luther. His struggles with faith and life mirror those of just about everyone in the congregation, and can be used as illustrations in preaching and teaching throughout the year.

    I mentioned the ignorance of our children regarding Luther. Most of the adults don’t have a much better grasp of his life and work. There’s a lot of misunderstanding based on rumors they’ve heard such as his supposed “leaving the Catholic Church so he could get married”. There are justifiable concerns about Luther such as the anti-Semitic comments he made in his later years. We need to be painting a true and accurate picture of the real Martin Luther who, I believe, IS a hero of the church. Not THE Hero, but a hero nonetheless, and a great role model for believers.

  3. Brad
    November 1st, 2013 at 10:07 | #3

    An excellent post.

    As I was reading the Sasse quote above, I couldn’t help be think of other great saints in the history of the Church, and the strange variations their followers have taken.

    As a point of reference, I have a great fondness for St. Francis of Assisi, but take a general survey of what “Franciscans” have been up in the last 100 years, and I imagine it would make the dear saint blanch. The same would be true, I’d wager, for the Augustinians, the Benedictines, and others.

    It is funny, how the orthodoxy of the Confessor becomes lost, as the idolatry of the Confessor rises.

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.