Becoming Steadfast: Politics and the Lutheran Reformation (Part 1)

June 26th, 2012 Post by

In his sermon given at the funeral of Duke John of Electoral Saxony (John the Steadfast), Martin Luther stated, “a prince is also a human being and always has ten devils around him where another man has only one, so that God must give him special guidance and set his angels about him.” (Luther’s Works, vol. 51, p. 236)  While the Lutheran Reformation revolved around the theological rediscovery of essential biblical teachings (i.e. justification by faith), political events played a major role in the Lutheran Reformers’ temporal success.  Most likely, Dr. Luther would have gladly embraced martyrdom in 1521.  However, his survival, based upon the support of certain German princes and city councils, changed the history of the Christian Church and the world.  As the above quote demonstrates, Luther had a very realistic understanding of the princes, even those who supported him.  In a series of blog posts we will examine the major political events related to the Lutheran Reformation and the significance of faithful lay princes for its continuation.

In June 1520 Pope Leo X issued the papal bull, Exsurge Domine (Arise O Lord), that identified and condemned forty one errors in Luther’s published writings.  However, Luther’s support in Germany continued to grow.  After Luther, Philip Melanchthon and students at Wittenberg burned the papal bull in December a rift seemed unavoidable.  On January 3, 1521 the papal curia published the final bull of excommunication against Martin Luther.  The politics surrounding the election of Charles V as Holy Roman Emperor of the German Nation had forestalled papal action against Luther for two years.  As one of the seven electors of the new emperor, Duke Frederick the Wise of Electoral Saxony had a strong political position in 1519.  Pope Leo X did not want Charles, who had recently become king of Spain, to replace his maternal grandfather (Maximilian I) as Holy Roman Emperor.  The pope had even suggested Frederick as a candidate for the imperial position.  Rejecting his own candidacy, Frederick convinced the majority of electors to vote for Charles in June 1519.

Charles V had agreed to significant concessions in order to become emperor.  Most significantly for Martin Luther in 1521, Charles had agreed to grant any imperial subject a hearing before impartial judges within the Holy Roman Empire before that subject’s condemnation.  Based on this concession and Frederick’s persuasive arguments, Charles agreed to give Martin Luther a hearing at the imperial Diet of Worms in April 1521.  This led to Dr. Luther’s famous testimony and refusal to recant before the imperial assembly, including Charles V and papal representatives.  The reaction to Luther’s speech exposed a developing rift within the Empire.  Although Luther already had significant support among the political leaders, Charles and the imperial assembly did issue an edict against Luther in May 1521.  This imperial edict declared Luther to be a heretical outlaw and forbade anyone to support him or even communicate with him.  The penalty for assisting Luther could be imprisonment and confiscation of one’s property.  Charles V and the papal party thought this edict would settle the matter. This edict and its ramifications played a major role in the politics of the Holy Roman Empire for the rest of Luther’s life.  In our next post we will examine the political developments in the Empire that led to the publication of the Augsburg Confession in 1530 and the Smalcald Articles in 1537.

For part 2 of this article, click here.

 

Dr. Phillips in Canterbury Cathedral

Associate Editor’s Note:  With this post we introduce our latest regular writer for BJS – Dr. Matthew Phillips.  Dr. Phillips will be writing for us in a category of Steadfast Past.  He has been a guest on Issues Etc. many times and we are happy to have now writing here for us.  Here is a little more about Dr. Phillips:

C. Matthew Phillips is Associate Professor of History at Concordia University, Nebraska.  He teaches various courses related to world and European history.  He completed his Ph.D. in medieval European history at Saint Louis University in 2006.  His research has focused on medieval monasticism, preaching, devotion to the True Cross, and the Crusades.  Additionally, he has scholarly interests in early modern European history and the writings and life of Martin Luther.  His blog is entitled, Historia et Memoria, and can be found at http://wp.cune.edu/matthewphillips/. He appears frequently on Issues, Etc.


Categories: Steadfast Past Tags: ,




Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Carl Vehse
    June 26th, 2012 at 15:03 | #1

    “In our next post we will examine the political developments in the Empire that led to the publication of the Augsburg Confession in 1530 and the Smalcald Articles in 1537.”

    As a minor historical point, Martin Luther completed his Articles in December of 1836 and sent them to the Elector on January 3, 1537, having been signed by eight other Lutheran theologians. Luther’s Articles were not discussed or adopted by the officials at Smalcald in February, although they were discussed privately by theologians at the meeting. However Luther did not publish his Articles until 1538, according to Frederick Bente in his Historical Introduction to the Lutheran Confessions (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, para. 77, p. 64) and Kenneth Hagen in his “The Historical Context of the Smalcald Articles” (Concordia Theological Quarterly, 51(4), October, 1987, p. 248). Luther’s 1538 publication did not contain the theologians’ signatures nor the appendix of Melanchthon. In the 1540s Luther published some revised editions of his Smalcald Articles.

  2. CMP
    June 26th, 2012 at 22:30 | #2

    @Carl Vehse #1

    I’ll work that into the next post. Although written in 1537, Luther’s publication date was 1538.

    Thank you for the Hagen reference.

  3. Lumpenkönig
    June 28th, 2012 at 22:15 | #3

    Speaking of Lutheran history: Happy Birthday, Franz Pieper!

    http://backtoluther.blogspot.com/

  4. Rev. Paul T. McCain
    June 30th, 2012 at 14:48 | #4

    Thank you, Dr. Phillips for an interesting article. Well done, sir.

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.