Concordia Theological Seminary President Nominees Announced

April 19th, 2011 Post by

News from Ft. Wayne:

Please be advised that the election for the new President of Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, Indiana will be held pursuant to Bylaw 3.10.4.5.2(b) on Saturday, May 21, 2011, at the campus of the Seminary at 6600 North Clinton Street, Fort Wayne, Indiana.

The following is the list of nominees who have permitted themselves to be candidates:

 

 

Pursuant to Bylaw 3.10.4.5(c), all recommendations, statements of qualifications of any nominees, or objections to any nominee with reasons therefore, must be filed with the Board of Regents before the date fixed for the election.






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Roger Gallup
    April 19th, 2011 at 18:41 | #1

    This is great news. I do not think I have ever seen such a qualified field of nominations for the president of one or our seminaries or universities. It speaks well for the future of the seminary. Let us pray for God’s blessings and wisdom for the electors who will make the decision.

  2. April 19th, 2011 at 19:17 | #2

    Outstanding list of names. God’s blessings on them all. May he who is chosen, lead our Seminary in Ft. Wayne in wisdom and honor to the glory of Christ.

  3. Nathan Raddatz
    April 19th, 2011 at 22:09 | #3

    I was told that all candidates had to have an earned PhD. How can Rev. Jeffrey Pulse be part of this list.

    Do not get me wrong, he is very good from what I hear, but does not the title before him.

    If this is the case, our church would have gladly nominated the Rev. John Fiene for this position as well.

    Can someone clarify for me what is going on?

  4. Rev. Roger D. Sterle
    April 19th, 2011 at 22:23 | #4

    @Nathan Raddatz #3
    Your question should be directed to someone at the seminary. I don’t recall anything in Synodical guidelines which states they have to have an earned doctorate–but that may have been a point of the calling committee. Contact Larry Rast at the seminary, he might have the answer and be able to give it.

  5. Eric Phillips
    April 20th, 2011 at 01:09 | #5

    Prof. Pulse is writing his dissertation, so he shouldn’t be without the PhD for long.

  6. Larry Kleinschmidt
    April 20th, 2011 at 01:31 | #6

    Karl Barth, former president of the St. Louis seminary, also had no earned doctorate.

  7. Rev. Loren Zell
    April 20th, 2011 at 07:24 | #7

    Sorry that I cannot be so enthusiastic about this list of candidates. I still think more leaders need to come from the ranks of clergy who have extensive experience as parish pastors. I believe the result would be better leaders and men who were more in tune with the needs of the local congregations that they serve.

  8. Rev. David J. Whan
    April 20th, 2011 at 08:42 | #8

    I believe Rev. Pulse is finishing up his doctorate from one of the Universities in England. Perhaps Durham; I can’t remember exactly.

  9. The Rev. BT Ball
    April 20th, 2011 at 09:31 | #9

    Rev. Zell-
    there certainly were long time parish pastors nominated, I know this for a fact as our congregation nominated the Rev. Dr. Scott Murray of Memorial, Houston. It seems he declined.

    The list above shows those who allowed their names to stand for possible election.

  10. CT Seminarian
    April 20th, 2011 at 10:25 | #10

    Prof. Pulse served congregations in both Iowa and Washington state for over over 20 years.
    What is interesting is that Rev. Gard, Rev. Fickenscher, Rev. Gieschen, Rev. Pulse and Rev. Jastram all graduated from CTS in 1984.

    For what it is worth, most of the students are very pleased with the list of nominees.

  11. helen
    April 20th, 2011 at 10:27 | #11

    As more of our professors have earned doctorates, I think it well for the President to appreciate that kind of labor, too. We also liked Dr. Murray, but were torn, because there are not so many confessional Pastors in Houston. Evidently he felt that he should stay there.
    Dr. Fickenscher has family in our congregation, so we know him for that and other reasons.

    God bless them all in their decisions, and lead the committee to make the right choice for CTS, LCMS and ultimately for us pewsitters!

  12. Albert hughes
    April 20th, 2011 at 10:29 | #12

    Has any of the above nominees distinguished themselves in confessionally defending the Lutheran faith?

    What I mean is have any of the above spoken out plainly and clearly and dared to be Lutheran without in any way, shape and form, at the same time, thinking of doing a CYA and temporizing the faith for fear of not getting ahead by being labeled a trouble maker or worse.

    A Pseudo-Confessional in name only we can do without.

  13. Rev. David Mueller
    April 20th, 2011 at 10:58 | #13

    @Albert hughes #12
    If you can’t answer that yourself, you need only do a little digging. Go back about 4 years and see who wrote what about SMP.

  14. Just Some Guy
    April 20th, 2011 at 11:28 | #14

    (Please excuse the pseudonym; certification has already taken place, but call night hasn’t, if you follow my meaning.)

    I am unfamiliar with Dr. Jastram apart from his appearances on Issues, Etc. (though his frequent appearances there probably say something about him), so I can’t speak to his qualification. That said, none of these [other] men is pseudo-confessional in the least. Each of these men has, in many and various ways, defended the truth and stood for Confessional Lutheranism. Further, each has demonstrated his commitment to Confessional Lutheranism by his instruction in the classroom to form new pastors for the Church. This I have seen from each one (again, except Dr. Jastram) and can attest to. I would be pleased to have any one of them serve my future alma mater as president. If you aren’t aware of how a particular candidate has distinguished himself in his confession, ask someone familiar with him, Google his name, call him on the phone, or do something besides assuming he’s guilty until proven innocent.

  15. Martin R. Noland
    April 20th, 2011 at 12:25 | #15

    Dear BJS Bloggers,

    Before you make SMP, or its criticism, the sine qua non for faithfulness in office, you should read this comment from a previous post and, PLEASE, read the CHIQ article I cite:

    http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=14494#comment-144344

    In many ways, SMP (and Delto) continues the Loehe-Fort Wayne-Springfield educational tradition that the LCMS lost when the synod decided to upgrade the Springfield curriculum. The story of that change is in my CHIQ article. Please don’t bash SMP until you read my article.

    SMP is much better than the local district ministry-prep programs; and is a better choice for congregations than a licensed lay minister. SMP is not an ideal program, because it could not “start from scratch.” But it is an improvement over what came before.

    The good faith efforts of seminary administrators and the Board of Pastoral Education in 2007 was vitiated in 2010 by Resolution 7-05. We also need to determine whether or not SMPs are being used as 1) “cheap” assistant pastors, or 2) sole pastors serving communities (or ethnic groups) that have no pastors. The latter purpose is in line the Loehe-Fort Wayne-Springfield tradition. The former is something new and rightly suspect. In any event, you cannot blame the former (“cheap assistant pastors”) on the former BPS or seminary administrators; the blame falls on the “usual suspects.”

    With regards to the candidates listed, all are excellent pastors, all are excellent communicators, all are excellent teachers, and all are personable. Of course, they are all well qualified in academics and experience. I think all have had some degree of administrative experience. These are the primary qualifications I would look at, since in my opinion they are what make a good general administrator and fund-raiser-for-the-church.

    The LCMS will be well-served by any of these candidates. The electors will have a tough time deciding this election!

    Yours in Christ, Martin R. Noland

  16. Marjorie
    April 20th, 2011 at 12:26 | #16

    The only thing wrong with this list is that some stupendous teacher will be removed from the classroom. Praise the Lord for providing such a list of faithful and confessional men willing and qualified to serve.

  17. David Hartung
    April 20th, 2011 at 13:11 | #17

    Looks like an outstanding list.

  18. David Hartung
    April 20th, 2011 at 13:33 | #18

    @Martin R. Noland #15
    Dr. Noland,
    Thank you for the link, I have just ordered my back copy, and joined CHI in th eprocess!

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.