Jesus First on low nominations: We meant to do that! (by Pr. Charles Henrickson)

April 29th, 2010 Post by

I’m sure you’ve seen a TV show or movie where the character slips and falls awkwardly, and then, in an attempt to save face, gets up and says, “I meant to do that!” Well, that’s kind of what the political organization Jesus First is doing now. In their April 2010 newsletter, they attempt to explain away the low nominations for their candidate by saying, in effect, “We meant to do that!”

The candidate Jesus First has campaigned for–for four election cycles now–has fallen off badly in his number of nominations. President Jerry Kieschnick’s nomination numbers have dropped by 28% from last time, down to 755, the lowest ever for an incumbent. But rather than admit that this could be a sign of dissatisfaction over President Kieschnick’s performance, Jesus First tries to save face:

“Many years ago when Jesus First recommended Rev. Gerald Kieschnick (LCMS President) and Rev. Donald Muchow (LCMS Chairman of the Board of Directors,) we worked to get enough nominations that each one would be on the ballot. This year we realized that President Gerald Kieschnick and First Vice President William Diekelman would easily receive enough nominations to be on the ballot. There seemed to be little reason to rally congregations to create more nominations.”

Yeah, those low nomination numbers? We meant to do that! If we had tried, we could have gotten our guy a LOT more nominations! But we didn’t bother this time.

“We give thanks for the fact that with no Jesus First effort beyond an announcement in this newsletter, both men are on the ballot.”

Jesus First is claiming: We didn’t do any political campaigning this time. You know, Jesus First is not a political organization.

Oh, really? Let’s take a look at this sampling of Jesus First articles, just in their last few issues:

January 2010: Nominate Candidates for Synod Leadership

“For a healthy Synod congregational involvement is really important. Start now by filling out and sending in this nominating ballot.
“Jesus First recommends the following candidates:
“President: (Nominate both)
“Rev. Gerald Kieschnick
“Rev. William Diekelman”

November 2009: Be Sure to Send in Nominations For Synod Officers

“For a healthy Synod congregational involvement is really important. Start now by filling out and sending in this nominating ballot.
“Jesus First recommends the following candidates:
“President: (Nominate both)
“Rev. Gerald Kieschnick
“Rev. William Diekelman”

October 2009: Your Influence Is Important

“With a Synodical election right around the corner, this is the time to exercise your influence by taking an active role. Get involved. Speak your mind. Encourage those around you to take an active role in Synod’s decision making process when it comes to electing delegates, nominating worthy candidates and discussing proposed actions the Convention might pass.”

October 2009: Does Jesus First Have a “Party Spirit”?

“With their permission, we recommend nominees to the convention delegates. Is this political work? Yes, this is politics in the best sense of trying to influence institutional decision making in the direction of strongly held values. . . . Does organized politics have any place in a church body? Until high agreement on values and ministry practices has emerged, we think so.”

September 2009: The Matter of the Convention Delegates

“We are all aware that the choice of delegates is very significant for any Synodical Convention. This is especially so for the 2010 convention. These circuit elections (to be reported by October 10) are very important.”

You know, if I didn’t know better, I’d say Jesus First has been rather busy campaigning for their candidate! And for a long time. You can find similar articles going back a decade.

The truth is, Jesus First is a well-oiled political machine, funded by a few donors with deep pockets, churning out scads of slick, full-color newsletters. And they show no signs of letting up. They plan to bombard delegates with TEN of their newsletters over the coming weeks!

Jesus First is arguably the most political organization in the history of the synod. They have been busy campaigning for their candidate, Jerry Kieschnick, for a long time. But now, when their candidate didn’t do so well on the nominations, they suddenly claim to have not been trying! Low nomination numbers? “We meant to do that!”






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. wrl
    May 1st, 2010 at 00:12 | #1

    Since JF won’t attack Harrison directly, or debate specific issues in an open forum like BJS, my guess is that we’ll be seeing a ten-issue mini-series starring LCMS’ Legion of Doom, with each issue featuring a passive/aggressive expose on a Missouri Super Villian. That they picked Pastor Henrickson first shows the influence of Issues, Etc. and BJS.

    Also expect a continuous “How dare you question St. Louis the Sun King?” mantra that will play to those in the undecided middle who believe in St. Louis Exceptionalism.

  2. May 1st, 2010 at 00:34 | #2

    wrl :Since JF won’t attack Harrison directly. . . .

    Notice that you will not find the name “Harrison” mentioned once in their newsletter, even when they’re talking about the nomination numbers. They do mention “Henrickson” a lot, but Henrickson ain’t running.

    Matt Harrison apparently is He Who Must Not Be Named.

    wrl :my guess is that we’ll be seeing a ten-issue mini-series starring LCMS’ Legion of Doom, with each issue featuring a passive/aggressive expose on a Missouri Super Villian. That they picked Pastor Henrickson first. . . .

    I guess I need to come up with a Super Villain identity. “The Swedish Svengali”? “Badman”?

    And what about my partners in crime? Mollie, Todd, Klemet, Tim? They’ll need identities, too.

  3. May 1st, 2010 at 02:53 | #3

    crayburn :Who was the U.S. president who compiled an “enemies list”?

    All of them.

    Actually, it was Richard Nixon.

  4. Helen
    May 1st, 2010 at 07:57 | #4

    @Timothy C. Schenks #53

    No, Tim, you were right the first time: “all of them.”

    This one, too. And he’s vindictive.
    Ask anyone who opposed YS, or sued him and were,supposedly, “forgiven.”
    [That list is growing, no doubt!]

  5. boogie
  6. Luvable Lutheran
    May 1st, 2010 at 20:45 | #6

    If post #51 is correct, who do we suspect will be the next featured guests in the spotlight?

  7. Helen
    May 2nd, 2010 at 09:19 | #7

    @Luvable Lutheran #56

    Good question, “Lovable” ! They’ll probably not mention Todd Wilken… Kicking Issues Etc off KFUO was probably one of the dumber political miscalculations… obviously it was supposed to go away and die. [Not sorry it didn’t!] :)

    Trying to answer Mollie on the pages of WSJ didn’t turn out so well either. :)
    (Even in their “controlled environment” attacking her might irritate their women.)

    Anyone else on the masthead here is probably having his life turned out for exploitable flaws as we write.

  8. May 3rd, 2010 at 03:26 | #8

    Jesus First’s archives for the last four years is full of articles stating the importance of the nominating process. Now they’re saying it doesn’t matter?

Comment pages
1 2 10146
If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.