Becoming Steadfast: Politics and the Lutheran Reformation (Part 1)

In his sermon given at the funeral of Duke John of Electoral Saxony (John the Steadfast), Martin Luther stated, “a prince is also a human being and always has ten devils around him where another man has only one, so that God must give him special guidance and set his angels about him.” (Luther’s Works, vol. 51, p. 236)  While the Lutheran Reformation revolved around the theological rediscovery of essential biblical teachings (i.e. justification by faith), political events played a major role in the Lutheran Reformers’ temporal success.  Most likely, Dr. Luther would have gladly embraced martyrdom in 1521.  However, his survival, based upon the support of certain German princes and city councils, changed the history of the Christian Church and the world.  As the above quote demonstrates, Luther had a very realistic understanding of the princes, even those who supported him.  In a series of blog posts we will examine the major political events related to the Lutheran Reformation and the significance of faithful lay princes for its continuation.

In June 1520 Pope Leo X issued the papal bull, Exsurge Domine (Arise O Lord), that identified and condemned forty one errors in Luther’s published writings.  However, Luther’s support in Germany continued to grow.  After Luther, Philip Melanchthon and students at Wittenberg burned the papal bull in December a rift seemed unavoidable.  On January 3, 1521 the papal curia published the final bull of excommunication against Martin Luther.  The politics surrounding the election of Charles V as Holy Roman Emperor of the German Nation had forestalled papal action against Luther for two years.  As one of the seven electors of the new emperor, Duke Frederick the Wise of Electoral Saxony had a strong political position in 1519.  Pope Leo X did not want Charles, who had recently become king of Spain, to replace his maternal grandfather (Maximilian I) as Holy Roman Emperor.  The pope had even suggested Frederick as a candidate for the imperial position.  Rejecting his own candidacy, Frederick convinced the majority of electors to vote for Charles in June 1519.

Charles V had agreed to significant concessions in order to become emperor.  Most significantly for Martin Luther in 1521, Charles had agreed to grant any imperial subject a hearing before impartial judges within the Holy Roman Empire before that subject’s condemnation.  Based on this concession and Frederick’s persuasive arguments, Charles agreed to give Martin Luther a hearing at the imperial Diet of Worms in April 1521.  This led to Dr. Luther’s famous testimony and refusal to recant before the imperial assembly, including Charles V and papal representatives.  The reaction to Luther’s speech exposed a developing rift within the Empire.  Although Luther already had significant support among the political leaders, Charles and the imperial assembly did issue an edict against Luther in May 1521.  This imperial edict declared Luther to be a heretical outlaw and forbade anyone to support him or even communicate with him.  The penalty for assisting Luther could be imprisonment and confiscation of one’s property.  Charles V and the papal party thought this edict would settle the matter. This edict and its ramifications played a major role in the politics of the Holy Roman Empire for the rest of Luther’s life.  In our next post we will examine the political developments in the Empire that led to the publication of the Augsburg Confession in 1530 and the Smalcald Articles in 1537.

For part 2 of this article, click here.

 

Dr. Phillips in Canterbury Cathedral

Associate Editor’s Note:  With this post we introduce our latest regular writer for BJS – Dr. Matthew Phillips.  Dr. Phillips will be writing for us in a category of Steadfast Past.  He has been a guest on Issues Etc. many times and we are happy to have now writing here for us.  Here is a little more about Dr. Phillips:

C. Matthew Phillips is Associate Professor of History at Concordia University, Nebraska.  He teaches various courses related to world and European history.  He completed his Ph.D. in medieval European history at Saint Louis University in 2006.  His research has focused on medieval monasticism, preaching, devotion to the True Cross, and the Crusades.  Additionally, he has scholarly interests in early modern European history and the writings and life of Martin Luther.  His blog is entitled, Historia et Memoria, and can be found at http://wp.cune.edu/matthewphillips/. He appears frequently on Issues, Etc.

Dr. Matthew Phillips

About Dr. Matthew Phillips

My name is C. Matthew Phillips and I am an Associate Professor of History at Concordia University, Nebraska. I completed my Ph.D. in medieval European history at Saint Louis University in 2006. My research has focused on medieval monasticism, preaching, devotion to the True Cross, and the Crusades. Additionally, I have interests in medieval and early modern European education and the writings and life of Martin Luther.


At Concordia I teach World Civilization I, World Civilization II, Europe Since 1914, Early and Medieval Christianity, Renaissance and Reformation, The Medieval Crusades, The History of Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union, and The Modern Middle East.


Comments

Becoming Steadfast: Politics and the Lutheran Reformation (Part 1) — 4 Comments

  1. “In our next post we will examine the political developments in the Empire that led to the publication of the Augsburg Confession in 1530 and the Smalcald Articles in 1537.”

    As a minor historical point, Martin Luther completed his Articles in December of 1836 and sent them to the Elector on January 3, 1537, having been signed by eight other Lutheran theologians. Luther’s Articles were not discussed or adopted by the officials at Smalcald in February, although they were discussed privately by theologians at the meeting. However Luther did not publish his Articles until 1538, according to Frederick Bente in his Historical Introduction to the Lutheran Confessions (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, para. 77, p. 64) and Kenneth Hagen in his “The Historical Context of the Smalcald Articles” (Concordia Theological Quarterly, 51(4), October, 1987, p. 248). Luther’s 1538 publication did not contain the theologians’ signatures nor the appendix of Melanchthon. In the 1540s Luther published some revised editions of his Smalcald Articles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.