Husband, Love your Wife with the Small Catechism

Adam fell down on his vocation as catechist of Eve. Ever since, husbands have had the tendency to default on their calling to teach the Word to their wives. This sin of husbands has had terrible effects in marriage and home, church and community, and these effects are transmitted from generation to generation.

This becomes plain when we (1) know what the word catechism means, and (2) zero in on the Lutheran understanding of the fall into sin.

Martin Luther did not invent the catechism. The word, to catechize, is a Greek verb that described a form of instruction used in ancient schools: kata and echo, to sound over or repeat again. It denoted a form of oral instruction. The teacher said something, and the children responded: learning by repetition. Paul used the word in Gal. 6:6 to refer to Christian instruction, so that it seemed to become almost a technical word among Christians for how they instructed believers.

Timothy J. Wengert, Martin Luther’s Catechisms, p. 3 (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2009).

Besides Galatians 6:6, it also appears in Luke 1:4, Acts 18:25, 21:21, Romans 2:18, and 1 Corinthians 14:19.

Faith in the Word is supported by being able to echo, to re-sound, to recount the sound form of words that say sound doctrine. A failure to echo or to recount the words of God’s commandment accurately is at the center of the fall into sin. Once the Word is not accurately repeated, faith in the Word is lost. Then humanity looks for wisdom apart from the external Word of God, such as by eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, mysticism, rationalism, enthusiasm, pragmatism, etc.

To the question, what is the first and principal sin of the first-created people, various parts of Christendom give different answers. Many say pride is the first and principal thing, and the other aspects are caused by and follow from that. Others say it was lust, rebellion against God’s sovereignty, or various other things.

All of those ideas are wrong. The first and principal sin relates to the Word and faith in the Word. Luther says,

This temptation is the true pattern of all temptations with which Satan assails the Word and faith. Before the desire to eat of the fruit arose in Eve, she lost the Word which God spoke to Adam. If she had adhered to this Word, she would have continued in the fear and faith of God. Where the opposite happens and the Word is lost, there is contempt of God and obedience to the devil.

All this is useful, that we may learn, as Peter says (1 Peter 5:9), to stand undaunted in temptation and to resist the tempter while holding on to the Word with a firm faith and closing our ears so as not to grant admittance to what is foreign to the Word. For truly, these afflictions of Eve and Adam are lessons for us, in order that we may not have the same experiences by being drawn away from the Word and from faith.

Martin Luther, Lectures on Genesis in Luther’s Works, vol. 1, p.158 (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1958).

What is the first evidence we can see of the loss of the Word and faith? The first evidence is a failure to echo the Word. It is a catechetical failure. Luther says,

She does not mention the punishment as God had stated it. He had simply stated (Gen. 2:17): “On whatever day you will eat from it, you will surely die.” Out of this absolute statement she herself makes one that is not absolute when she adds: “Lest perchance we shall die.”

This is a striking flaw, and one that must not be overlooked; for it shows that she has turned from faith to unbelief. For just as a promise demands faith, so a threat also demands faith. … On her own she is adding to God’s Word the little word “perchance.” And so the deceit of the lying spirt met with success. What he sought to achieve above all – to lead Eve away from the Word and faith – this he has now achieved to the extent that Eve distorts the Word of God.

Id., p. 155.

Johann Gerhard expresses the same thing this way.

On her own she added “perchance,” as if it were uncertain that they would die if they had eaten of it, though God nevertheless had expressed His will openly and clearly [Gen 2:17]. She also adds on her own that the tree was indeed not even to be touched.

Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces: On Original Sin, On Actual Sins, On Free Choice, p. 7 (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014).

When she distorted the Word – when she added one little word – that was a catechetical failure to echo or to recount the Word in the sound form of words. Gerhard says, “Afterward, on the basis of the answer of Eve, who did not correctly recount God’s prohibition, the devil becomes more bold and completely denies the Word of God.” Id., p. 15.

Death already has happened. It happens at the instant of unbelief. Pride, lust, envy, and the rest result from unbelief and do not cause death but are only descriptions of death. Those other things delineate what comes of unbelief.

Many questions about Adam’s role in this have been asked. Was he with Eve when she was talking with the Devil? Was he near enough that it could be said he was with her, but not so near as to hear the conversation? Was he right beside her, and not speaking up?

I don’t know. But here is what I do know. Scripture interprets Scripture. In Romans 5, Paul does not ascribe this fall to Eve. In verses 12-20, Paul points to Adam ten times:

  • through one man sin entered the world
  • death reigned from Adam
  • transgression of Adam
  • one man’s offense
  • the one who sinned
  • one offense
  • one man’s offense
  • death reigned through the one
  • one man’s offense
  • one man’s disobedience

This makes no sense if we view Eve’s sin as one offense and Adam’s sin as another offense. There is one offense. This one offense is the offense of Adam. How are Adam and Eve involved in one and the same offense, so that naming only Adam’s offense does also include Eve’s same offense? Only the Lutheran understanding of the fall can answer this.

The fall is loss of the Word and loss of faith, before pride or anything else is involved. Both Adam and Eve lost the Word and faith. Eve gave a distorted echo of the Word. Adam gave no echo at all. Adam failed to confess the Word to Eve when she was being tempted. You might protest that Genesis does not say this, but how do you evade Romans 5?

Husbands, we are involved in the sin of Adam, the first husband, when we fail to catechize our wives. Failure to catechize is as much an evidence of loss of the Word and faith as is a failure to, as Gerhard puts it, “correctly recount” the word.

Husband, are you leaving to assumption that your wife has the sound form of words? Are you leaving it to the church? Are you leaving it to her upbringing? Are you leaving it to the women’s Bible study group? Why aren’t the Word and your wife worth more than that?

It’s not hard to catechize. Luther’s Small Catechism itself, leaving aside explanations of it that others have added, is just a little pamphlet. My pastor likes to call it the Little Catechism (as do church historians such as Philip Schaff), and little it is.

Just get two copies of the Little Catechism. Give one to your wife. No, check that. Get three copies and give two of them to her. She’ll put one in her purse and carry it with her. The other she will keep at home. Those are going to be the Catechisms you gave her. To her, they will be special. Then several times each week, read aloud to her one of the six chief parts. It takes only about three minutes. Remember that repetition is a key to learning. When you finish the six chief parts, start them over again. Keep cycling through them for as many years as God gives the two of you together.

She might ask questions. Sometimes you might not have answers. It’s okay to not have an answer. You can get an answer from the pastor, and then teach it to her. It also is okay if she gets the answer from the pastor. What’s not okay is that the question never arises because you never catechize her.

When you took on the estate of marriage, you took on the duty to teach your wife. She has a right to expect this from you. Paul says, “Let them ask their own husbands at home.” 1 Corinthians 14:33.

Once I heard a standup comedian say, “The four most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘We need to talk,’ when spoken by a wife to a husband.” Well, men, you and your wives do need to talk, and Dr. Luther has made this as easy as falling off a log. Don’t wait until she takes up her rights as Paul taught and asks you about the Word and faith. Lead the way. Love your wife with the Small Catechism.

About T. R. Halvorson

T. R. Halvorson was born in Sidney, Montana on July 14, 1953, baptized at Pella Evangelical Lutheran Church in Sidney, Montana on November 8, 1953, and confirmed at First Lutheran Church in Williston, North Dakota in 1968. He and his wife, Marilyn, are members of Trinity Lutheran Church (LCMS) in Sidney, Montana. They have three sons and six grandchildren. T. R. farms at Wildrose, North Dakota, and is Deputy County Attorney in Sidney, Montana. He has been a computer programmer; and an author, conference speaker, instructor, and consultant to industry in online legal information. He is among the authors of the religion column in the Sidney Herald at Sidney, Montana. He is the Editor of LutheranCatechism.com.


Comments

Husband, Love your Wife with the Small Catechism — 3 Comments

  1. The article leaves me wondering what Mr. Halvoron’s own experiences have been with the practices he recommends.

  2. Thank you for this article. Husbands love their wives by being their protective covering – their spiritual heads. Women love their husbands by submitting to this authority, asking those difficult biblical questions, and showing the respect for their spouse’s office in the home and church. Nothing belittles a man more than a Jezebel who desires her husband’s spiritual leadership role.
    On Father’s Day, I tried to make a point of thanking the men in our little congregation who are in leadership roles and who make the (sometimes) difficult decisions in our voters’ assemblies. I trust God to lead faithful men into these roles. I’ve got enough on my plate caring for my household in a million other ways.

  3. @Carl H #1

    Why don’t you ask him? Or are you more interested in sowing the seeds of doubt and defeatism? Mr. Halvorson is exhorting us to the highest ideals of diligence in our vocations. What are you doing?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.