Women in the Military

Woman in uniform sea captain with rifle, isolated on white backgA friend has written some thoughtful comments about the prospect of requiring young women to register for the draft.  I thought I would share them with the readers of Brothers of John the Steadfast.

 

Pastor Rolf Preus

 

In the past few months many people have voiced their objections to the recent actions of the US military to integrate women fully into the Armed Services. The determination that women can serve in combat positions is part of a broader action by the federal government that aims to restructure how people think about men, women, marriage, and the family.  It is part of the LGBTQ agenda, which wants fundamentally to reconstruct the divinely created order of men and women and to divorce human sexuality from the Creator’s purposes. For the LGBTQ “community”, sex is an instrument of pleasure and sentiment. For the Christian, sex is a gift of God to be enjoyed in sanctified union for the creation of children and consolation of the married. Sex belongs within holy matrimony, which God has given to the world as an example of Christ’s love for the Church. As Paul teaches in Ephesians 5, when the man submits himself to the law of marriage in service and sacrifice to the woman, who responds to his love with faith and trust, the man acts as a sign of Christ’s love for the Church and the world through the Church. In this divinely given relationship, wives submit to their husbands as the Church does to Christ—not from fear of coercion, but in glad reception of the gifts of the Lord. The recent decision of those who administer the Armed Services seeks to destroy this institution of marriage and the social order built upon marriage. It belongs to the larger LGBTQ agenda and should be opposed.[1]

For that reason, the Christian people of the LCMS need to understand the real issue that lurks just beneath this discussion of women-in-combat.  The more radical issue is the prospect of the government requiring women to register for the selective service.[2] In the past, the Supreme Court found that since women could not serve in combat, they were exempt from the Selective Service System.  This broad judgment reflected the past consensus of a society that had been shaped by Protestant Christian mores. That consensus has broken down. Now that the Armed Services have said that women can serve in combat, some have moved to argue that women should be required to register for the Selective Service. This latter move from what is permissible to what is mandated is really the most radical thing; we need to oppose it on the basis of the Word of God.

We need to voice our public and conscientious objection to women being forced to register for the Selective Service into any military role.  Forcing women to register for the Selective Service interrupts the divinely established order of creation and the model of sanctified human life that the inspired Scriptures have given us, especially in Gen. 2, Ephesians 5 and 1 Cor. 11. This government action establishes, as a matter of principle, that women and men are interchangeable in both public and domestic roles and that the secular government determines the shape of the home. It is the same principle operative in the LGBTQ movement, which says that men and women are interchangeable—in the home, in the bathroom, in the military. That false doctrine cannot be allowed to take over the Church or our homes.

In former years, the government respected the natural order determined by marriage. The laws assumed that men bear the duty of defense of the home and that women are to be protected by men, as a matter of rule and principle. Certainly, many noble women served in various capacities throughout our history. Many of us have seen the grey pictures of our aunts or grandmothers who served as nurses in World War II. Many have seen the voluntary service of women in more recent years. The difference, however, is that never before has the government claimed the power to force women out of the home and into the Armed Services. Never before has the government claimed the power to determine the relationship of men to women and to redirect the course of a woman’s life in such a radical way. God has not given that power to government. God has intended that the institution of marriage determine the shape of society and ultimately, the actions of government. Marriage does not depend upon the government, but the government depends upon marriage. The Large Catechism speaks clearly on this priority of marriage: “We should not despise or disdain this walk of life [marriage], as the blind world and our false clergy do, but view it in the light of God’s Word, by which it is adorned and sanctified. Because of this Word it is not a walk of life to be placed on the same level with all the others, but it is before and above them all, whether those of emperor, princes, bishops, or any other. Important as the spiritual and civil walks of life are, these must humble themselves and allow all people to enter marriage as a walk of life, as we shall hear [K/W 414.209].” The Word of God which “adorns” marriage is found most clearly in Genesis 2, 1 Cor. 11, and Ephesians 5. In those texts, it is clear that God created women to live in a complementary and joyous relationship with men and to be served by men. The government does not have the right to force Christian women to abandon God’s natural order and her right, under God’s blessing, to take up the great calling of marriage and service to her family, which God has established as a holy and sacred thing.

 

A law requiring women to register for the selective service would violate the moral conviction of many Christian people and expressly contradict the Word of God. What a woman might do in Christian freedom needs to be separated from what a woman is forced to do out of government coercion.

 

For this reason, let us urge our Synod to affirm our conscientious objection to any law that requires women to register for the selective service.

 

[1] NB: Eric Fanning, appointed by Pres. Obama in November 2015, is the first openly homosexual Secretary of the Army. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-to-nominate-first-openly-gay-service-secretary-to-lead-the-army/2015/09/18/d4b1aafe-5e30-11e5-8e9e-dce8a2a2a679_story.html

[2] http://www.militarytimes.com/story/military/2016/04/27/ndaa-hasc-women-draft/83624490/


Comments

Women in the Military — 4 Comments

  1. “Forcing women to register for the Selective Service interrupts the divinely established order of creation and the model of sanctified human life that the inspired Scriptures have given us, especially in Gen. 2, Ephesians 5 and 1 Cor. 11.”

    Rev. Preus’ stated position is that forced selective service registration for women is a direct violation of God’s established order of creation and is contrary to the will and command of God.

    Are imprecatory prayers planned for Missouri Synod Lutheran worship services and at the synodical convention, for God to strike down these evil (and traitorous) plans for selective service registration of women and women in combat? Will there be prayers in which, using Martin Luther’s words:

    “We should pray that our enemies [the Demonicrat kakistocracy] be converted and become our friends and, if not, that their doing and designing be bound to fail and have no success and that their persons perish rather than the Gospel and the kingdom of Christ.” (Luther’s Works, 21, 1000).

  2. What have the numerous “Lutheran” church bodies done over the last 60+ years to….
    + ….tolerate/encourage/further this despicable agenda?
    + ….stop/halt/hinder this rotting corpse agenda?
    + ….rightly confess the truth regarding women, church, and ministry?

    What good will locking the barn door do us now? Have we not played our part in handing our women over to the wolves?

    Repent

    The good news is that the Lord delights in having mercy upon sinners, just like us. In fact, “Christ dwells only in sinners” (Luther). That means that Christ dwells only in a Church made up of sinners—people and pastors just like us. If we won’t be sinners (Repent!), we shall have no Savior.

    Jesus has given us an astounding gift. We have the treasure of the Gospel so marvelously and biblically laid before us by Luther’s Small Catechism. May the Lord grant us repentance, all of us, that the Gospel not pass from us and that we poor sinners—yes, the Missouri Synod—might be His own tool to preach repentance, forgiveness, and faith in His name—even now, even today.

    Sep. 7, 2010
    ~Rev. Matt Harrison

    https://blogs.lcms.org/2010/beginning-with-repentance-9-2010

  3. BTW, the photo of the woman above is from Cutcaster, an online marketplace for high-quality, royalty-free stock photography. The photo is labeled “Photo of Woman in uniform sea captain with rifle.” A sea captain is a captain of a merchant ship, not a Navy or other military vessel. While the cap has the word, “Captain” on it, the jacket has no insignia and is not the style worn by captains of passenger or cargo vessels. The M-4 carbine the model is holding appears to be plastic, which is probably a good idea.

  4. The treacherous plans of the Obama kakistocracy to destroy the U.S. military not only include putting women in combat roles, but now they include:

    The Pentagon plans to announce the repeal of its ban on transgender service members July 1, a controversial decision that would end nearly a year of internal wrangling among the services on how to allow those troops to serve openly, according to Defense officials.

    Final approval would come from Defense Secretary Ash Carter, and the announcement will be on the eve of the Fourth of July weekend.

    The plan would direct each branch of the armed services over a one-year period to implement new policies affecting recruiting, housing and uniforms for transgender troops, one official said.

    Carter announced last year that the ban, which affects a fraction of the military’s 1.3 million active duty members, would be lifted unless a review showed that doing so would have “adverse impact on military effectiveness and readiness.”

    Excerpted from a June 24 USA Today article, “Ban on transgender troops to be lifted July 1.”

    Elsewhere it was noted:

    Unnamed defense officials told AP that “the military also wants time to tackle questions about where transgender troops would be housed, what uniforms they would wear, what berthing they would have on ships, which bathrooms they would use and whether their presence would affect the ability of small units to work well together.”

    And will there be imprecatory prayers in Lutheran churches this Sunday for God to destroy the evil plans of this traitorous regime?

    Crickets!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.