ACELC — Can There Be Koinonia in Worship?

This came in an email from the ACELC and can also be found on their website:

 

“Worship the Lord in the splendor of holiness; tremble before him, all the earth!” … Psalm 96:9

ACELC-LogoIf you want to start a lively discussion in the LCMS today, or perhaps even a fight, bring up the topic of worship. A quick perusal of worship options will likely leave your head spinning: traditional worship, blended worship, contemporary worship, liturgical worship, multi-sensory worship, emergent worship, seeker worship, and the list goes on. There was a time, not all that long ago, when you could walk into an LCMS congregation anywhere from coast to coast and know pretty much what to expect with regard to worship. Those days are long gone.

I know of very few who are calling for exact uniformity in worship forms with every congregation worshiping the exact same way each and every time they gather. Nor do I know of very few Lutherans who are actually advocating an “anything goes” attitude with regard to worship – as if worship forms are a completely indifferent thing. However, the simple truth is that the way one worships reflects and shapes what they believe (lex orandi; lex credendi). One who holds a Roman Catholic confession will surely want to worship in a way that reflects their faith. The same is true for Baptists,  Methodists,  Pentecostals and the Orthodox. For a Baptist to pray the Rosary would be unthinkable; for a Roman Catholic to replace the Lord’s Supper with Foot Washing would be a denial of the faith.

For some reason, however, Lutherans have at times failed to see this obvious connection between faith and practice, especially in the area of worship. Is there a distinctively Lutheran way to worship? I say it’s high time for us to have the courage to stand up and say, “Yes!” Truly Lutheran worship reflects and extols what Lutherans distinctively believe, teach, and confess. Truly Lutheran worship embraces the freedom we have in Christ, while at the same time willingly restrains our freedom for the sake of the body of Christ. Truly Lutheran worshipis Koinonia and promotes Koinonia.

In April of 2013, the Association of Confessing Evangelical Lutheran Congregations (ACELC) held a conference on the topic of worship, with a goal of Koinonia. We brought together people from all sides of the worship divisions in our midst and let God’s Word and the Lutheran Confessions have their way with us. As a fruit of that conference, the ACELC presents to the church “7 Theses on Worship.”

These Theses are not to be the only word, the last word, or the complete word on the issue of worship. We present them for discussion and study and reflection; we pray that as we wrestle with this often difficult and emotional topic, God will have His way with us and His gift of Koinonia will be the result. Please review the Theses. Please review the other documents on worship that we have on our website and especially the conference papers. We pray that our efforts would be a blessing both for you and for our Synod.

Humbly submitted,
Rev. Clint K. Poppe
Chairman, ACELC

 

ACELC 7 Theses on Worship (NoteFootnotes are included in the body of the document which follows since they could not be included at the bottom of the pages in a web document. If you download the actual document all the footnotes will be intact, as will all hyperlinks to other all referenced cited below)

(Unanimously adopted by the ACELC Representatives at the General Meeting in Cedar Falls, IA, on February 27, 2014.)

Prologue:

“The Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.” (Mark 10:45; Matthew 20:28 – All Scripture references are from the NKJV unless noted.)

“Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. (Matthew 11:28)

“I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will believe in Me through their word; that they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me.” (John 17:20f)

“O Lord, open my lips, and my mouth shall show forth Your praise.” (Psalm 51:15)

Our Lord is the Lord who serves. Pursuant to the above words, and Christ’s words to the Samaritan woman at the well ― “The hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him. God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth” (John 4:23f)

The ACELC fraternally offers the following Theses as the conviction and unanimous confession of the member congregations that these are the things which constitute orthodox Christian worship in harmony with Holy Scripture and The Lutheran Confessions. We submit these to the Church, and specifically the member congregations of the LCMS, as embodying the truths regarding worship by which any congregation (or larger gathering) would in truth call themselves Lutheran.

THESIS 1 (The ACELC is indebted to the 1995-96 “6 Theses on Worship” produced and published by Concordia University Wisconsin for the pattern used for these 7 Theses, including much of their content and wording.)

WE CONFESS that worship is the Triune God’s service to us, His Royal Priesthood of the Baptized (The term, Royal Priesthood of the Baptized, is used in this document because it identifies concretely whom the Lord of the Church is serving in the Divine Service. The ACELC uses this term in its “Evidence of Errors … in the Office of the Holy Ministry” document, page 4, as do the sainted Rev. Ken Korby and Rev. George Wollenburg in some of their papers.), and our God-given responses to His grace-filled service; that service which always directs us back to the Triune God from whom all blessings flow. Therefore,

WE REJECT that worship is primarily a human activity, embodied in congregations where fabricated endeavors promote emotion-centered adoration and praise.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN for ACELC congregations? Recognizing the Trinitarian-centeredness of orthodox Christian worship, the ACELC congregations pledge themselves to liturgical orders, traditions, practices, and hymnody which locate Christ at the heart and center of God’s gracious activity whereby He delivers and faith lays hold of, and receives, the grace of God and the merit of Christ in the promise of the Gospel.

THESIS 2

WE CONFESS that orthodox Christian worship emanates from the gracefilled, life-giving Gospel of Jesus Christ; that He and His atoning sacrifice for all mankind’s sin is the heart, the center, the fount of all Christian worship; and that in worship, this living and saving Lord comes to give us His own divine, eternal life in body and soul. Therefore,

WE REJECT worship practices which give the impression that worship derives from the Law, that is, that our works, feelings, or gifts supplement the work of Christ.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN for ACELC congregations? Recognizing the grace-filled, life-giving nature of orthodox Christian worship, the ACELC congregations pledge themselves to orders of service (liturgy) which are in service to the Gospel as well as preaching which includes God’s Word of Law and Gospel, rightly divided, with the saving Gospel of forgiveness of sins through faith in Christ Jesus being most prominent.

THESIS 3

WE CONFESS that in the liturgy, God’s Holy Word and Sacraments are proclaimed and administered, and through these Means of Grace, delivers forgiveness, life, and salvation into our ears, consciences, and mouths. Therefore,

WE REJECT that the liturgy is a mere form to produce the desired responses in worshippers.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN for ACELC congregations? Recognizing the great liturgical gifts bequeathed to the Church through the centuries as reliable and effective rituals for delivering the living and life-giving Gospel, the ACELC congregations pledge themselves to historic liturgical orders which ensure the centrality of the forgiveness of sins and contribute to unity and uniformity, including the Divine Service of Word and Sacrament along with the historic prayer offices.

THESIS 4

WE CONFESS that music’s purpose in the Church is to support and adorn the living and life-giving voice of the Gospel. Therefore,

WE REJECT that music is present for entertainment or solely artistic purposes or to satiate the personal penchant of pastors or people.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN for ACELC congregations? Recognizing the importance of music in the Church, the ACELC congregations pledge themselves to such instruments, hymns, chorales, and other related music which are in accord with Lutheran theology and best aid congregational singing and support and adorn the living and life-giving voice of the Gospel.

THESIS 5

WE CONFESS that worship, the decent and orderly gathering of the Royal Priesthood of the Baptized around Word and Sacrament “with angels and archangels and with all the company of heaven,” transcends time, space, culture, and social barriers, and is thus catholic (i.e., universal, Christian). Therefore,

WE REJECT that worship is free to be defined by the tastes, whims, preferences, or visions of an individual or group of worshippers.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN for ACELC congregations? Recognizing the importance of peace and tranquility in Christ’s Church, the ACELC congregations pledge themselves to the historic liturgical rites of Christendom which are in agreement with Lutheran theology and undergird the living and life-giving voice of the Gospel. (LCMS Constitution, Article VI Conditions of Membership: “4. Exclusive use of doctrinally pure agenda, hymnbooks, and catechisms in church and school.” To do otherwise than this is to violate our “covenants of love” – Foreword to Synod’s Constitution & Bylaws.)

THESIS 6

WE CONFESS that a setting and environment is best suited for worship when it is theologically sound, aesthetically pleasing, orderly arranged, and spiritually edifying. Therefore,

WE REJECT that art, architecture, and arrangement are neutral factors in a setting for worship.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN for ACELC congregations? Recognizing the importance of the setting and environment of worship, the ACELC congregations pledge themselves to strive to build and maintain such decent and orderly settings and environments as conform to Lutheran theology and practice, especially in promoting the centrality of the Word and Sacraments and enhancing a sense of holy and reverent awe, through our use of furnishings, seating, paraments, vestments, banners, etc.

THESIS 7

WE CONFESS that true worship is not a matter of orders or liturgies, but the exercise of faith (which believes in the Triune God and receives His blessings and consolation) struggling with unbelief and despair – concerning the promises of the Gospel (Triglotta, Of the Power and Primacy of the Pope, paragraph 44); and yet, love for Christ and His Body engenders a limiting of personal freedom and promotes seeking consensus in all matters of worship because unity and uniformity of orders and ceremonies in a given Synod, Diocese, Territory, et al, best give expression to continuity with the Church catholic, promote tranquility, and avoid offenses. At the same time,

WE REJECT that all matters of ceremonies and human ordinances must be in conformity for fellowship, so long as there is otherwise agreement in doctrine and all its articles, including the right use of the holy sacraments (Triglotta, Formula of Concord, Epitome, Article X, Of Church Rites, paragraph 7).

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN for ACELC congregations? Recognizing the importance of ceremonies which serve the Gospel in curbing fleshly distractions, and acknowledging that we live in constant tension between freedom and constraint in our use of the Divine Service – a sacred tradition of the Lord which we are to pass on to succeeding generations by His grace – the ACELC congregations pledge themselves to the Divine Service where the Word is rightly preached and the Sacraments rightly administered, wherein the Holy Spirit, through the external Word, delivers a reliable account of the heavenly council’s verdict to our conscience.

Soli Deo Gloria

Appendix

The resources used to formulate and write the ACLEC 7 Theses on Worship include Holy Scripture, The Lutheran Confessions, Evidence of Errors in The Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod: III. The Divine Service and Liturgical Offices, and those noted here. The first six of these Worship Theses are modeled after and heavily influenced by the “6 Theses on Worship” as highlighted in footnote 7. Those used in Thesis 7 are a result of the presentations and papers from the 2013 ACELC Conference: “Christ for Us: The Divine Service” (2013 Conference Papers). Additional resources for matters of importance related to worship may be found at the ACELC website.

Posted in Found on the Web Tagged permalink

About Norm Fisher

Norm was raised in the UCC in Connecticut, and like many fell away from the church after high school. With this background he saw it primarily as a service organization. On the miracle of his first child he came back to the church. On moving to Texas a few years later he found a home in Lutheranism when he was invited to a confessional church a half-hour away by our new neighbors.

He is one of those people who found a like mind in computers while in Middle School and has been programming ever since. He's responsible for many websites, including the Book of Concord, LCMSsermons.com, and several other sites.

He has served the church in various positions, including financial secretary, sunday school teacher, elder, PTF board member, and choir member.

More of his work can be found at KNFA.net.

Comments

ACELC — Can There Be Koinonia in Worship? — 12 Comments

  1. A good book on this topic that I would suggest is “Why Johnny Can’t Sing Hymns.” Even though the author is Anglican, his insights are valuable for Lutherans.

  2. in regards to theses 4, I must wholeheartedly agree. In accord with Lutheran theology and the best aid in congregational singing… the fact of the matter is the hymnody of the LSB and it’s predecessors is often quite difficult to sing. Quite candidly this is where a piece of music that has been vetted by the pastor as sound theologically whose downfall may only be it is not in the LSB, but yet is quite singable as it is of the pop variety comes into play. We struggle at our church to be able to sing several hymns very well. Make a joyful noise unto The Lord, not just noise. I have seen firsthand how Professors of Music look down there noses at “pop music” that anybody can sing and rightfully so, they have higher expectations for their students. The ability to sing well is a God Given talent and God gave more of it to some than others.

  3. There is music of the “pop” variety in LSB… or the electronic version… IMHO.

    But you don’t need it unless you’ve been brainwashed by “7-11” on the radio. When I was a kid, nobody told us we couldn’t sing, so we just did. Like ducks swam, and robins flew. And men who hadn’t been past 8th grade raised the church rafters with the liturgy and Lutheran hymns. (They were almost all Krusty Krauts, BTW)

    God didn’t make most of us Pavarotti, but He gave almost everyone a tongue and a mouth. And He doesn’t conduct auditions. So, who’s singing for “professors of music”?
    “Sing unto the Lord!” 🙂

    Christ is risen! Alleluia!

  4. These theses seem reasonable – not at all extremist.  I believe that LCMS could come to an 85% consensus on them.  They should be the basis for Koinonia worship discussions.

  5. @John Rixe #4
    None of the admonitions from the ACELC are “extremest,” though there are those who would like to label us as such. I still wonder what it is that the COP and others cannot or refuse to see in this group to criticize, especially in light of their earnest desire to follow Pres. Harrison’s guidelines in “It’s Time” which talk of the grassroots efforts needed to bring about change in the LCMS. My fervent prayer is that as others read and study the papers from ACELC, they are driven to sign the admonition in support! Numbers do matter.

  6. A hearty Amen to the ACELC 7 Theses on Worship!

    Speaking from practical experience in the LWF-affiliated Lutheran Church in Malaysia (LCM): There should be no compromise on the issue of worship … doctrine and worship go together …

    Here in the LCM, there is neither doctrine nor worship, to put it simply. But as the local English goes, “what ‘to’ do?” …

    Even in the congregation that I attend which is already by far and large the most liturgical of all, there is syncretism in the form of CCM and charismatic-style worship. “Have to” — or else the young people will run away …

    The mentality, to put it crudely, is first all what pleases me in worship, and then “fit” that into the idea of “serving God.” Almost everyone wants to have a share in the worship cake because that’s the “in thing” in church spirituality or worship custom …

    A very lamentable situation, indeed — because the adults are complicit and lack the courage or conviction or even knowledge to set the things properly and in order …

  7. The whole contemporary worship thing is a self-conceited and self-deluded exercise, really … the practitioner basically Christianise that which is even considered extreme by the world (for that is precisely what contemporary worship is) for a religious or holy setting, that which is “over-the-top” and thinks that his self-produced feelings and gratification (of the lust for self-gratification) is the presence of the Holy Spirit! It borders on blasphemy!

  8. I’m ashamed to say that they ended the service with Kool and the Gang’s “Celebration”at my former Nazarene church on Easter Sunday 🙁

  9. Considering “former” the operative term, I would suggest you consider any guilt of yours regarding this shameful celebration borne and taken away by the Lamb of God, and so lay any and all shame in that regard aside, rejoicing that it is no longer yours; not because somebody else did the shameful thing, as much, but rather because Someone Else has taken it from you …

  10. in terms of hymnody and sing ability the ELCA hymnal has much more singable tunes in it than TLH, LSB, etc. I blaspheme I know. I am not advocating anything other than being able to have the entire congregation, brass choir and organists be able to sing and play well. Our brass choir has a terrible time keeping members they say too many sharps and flats in the music. the trumpets and trombones have a heck of a time. no one is willing to take to the time or is able to transpose. it often sounds horrible. we have an aging organist group. not many budding organists in the pipeline. the cd series is an option, however there is something to be said for live accompaniment…

  11. @KrustyKraut #10

    There are organists. (They get the equivalent of CRM, too.) Concordia here eliminated its organ program; they said nobody wanted it. Not long after, UT ((in the same town) said its organ program had increased 600%… and it bought another recital organ. There’s something [odd, at least] with that picture.

    We have brass playing with our organ, out of LSB, fairly regularly. Maybe your musicians should contact ours and ask how they do it?

  12. During Holy Week I saw a post on facebook from the wife of an LCMS Pastor that stated quote: “The Messianic Praise Dancers really enhanced our Passover celebration(with photos)”.

    And I’m the one who is supposed to be “out of step”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.