Seminaries: Beware Who You Host – President Kieschnick and All His Men May Not be much Interested in Retaining Residency Seminaries, by Pr. Rossow

October 30th, 2009 Post by

This notice appeared at the Ft. Wayne Seminary:

P R E S I D E N T ‘ S O F F I C E
Dear Seminary Family:
This coming week, November 4-6, it will be our privilege to host the President’s Seminary Summit to discuss and plan for the future of theological education in our church. Our guests will include President Kieschnick and his staff, the Board for Pastoral Education, the Board of Regents and President Meyer of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, and our Board of Regents. Keynote speaker for the Summit will be Dr. Daniel Aleshire, Executive Director for the Association of Theological Schools. I invite you to greet and to visit with our guests. -President Wenthe

I am sure that there will be a lot of helpful things discussed at this meeting and I am sure that President Kieschnick will have some good input but our seminaries better beware who they host. Comments have been heard around the synod that our traditional residency seminary education is outdated. The expensive new age consultants that President Kieschnick keeps hiring are seeking to remake the synod in the eyes of the culture. Years of pastoral formation at the feet of our masters of theology is being replaced by a few internet courses and some experience in a “happy clappy church” or an emergent coffee house sanctuary (the Specific Ministry Program – SMP). Our grandfather’s seminary is in peril I fear.

Read 442 times

 





  1. Bubbles
    October 30th, 2009 at 14:42 | #1

    Without significant seminaries, is there any value the synod brings to the table?

  2. LCMS Christian, Classical musician
    October 30th, 2009 at 14:44 | #2

    I second that, Bubbles.

  3. Name Unknown
    October 30th, 2009 at 15:07 | #3

    Online courses cannot replace the pastoral formation which happens at the seminaries. It is not only sitting at the feet of the masters of theology, but it is also the interaction between those who are being formed and wrestling with the deep theological issues which arise. It makes our pastors better at approaching these issues when they arise in the congregation. It is the “honing of the skills” which cannot be replicated outside a brick-and-mortar institution.

  4. Ariel
    October 30th, 2009 at 15:14 | #4

    I’m no seminarian, but through various and sundry Dilbert-like desk jobs I have read countless memos, and this sounds a lot like the bureaucratic version of the death rattle to me.

  5. sumbody
    October 30th, 2009 at 16:38 | #5

    Or better still it could be hash and rehash…and many of us thru many articles on BJS and our own personal comments being told us re: Synod or happenings with cong. I don’t think there is too much to shake us up anymore.

    I have a question is Thrivent footing the bill for this one????? Just wondering as MANY of us today just do a lot of wondering and PRAYING.

  6. elnathan the Younger
    October 30th, 2009 at 17:29 | #6

    sumbody asks: “Thrivent footing the bill for this one? Who knows! I do know that before the merger of LB and AAL the theological financial support given to the synod was substantial. I received a scholarship from AAL every year to work on my doctorate. Now all I see is Thrivent contributing to building houses, helping food pantries and the like – certainly worthy kingdom of the left matters, but little support, from my perspective, to the matters that matter – that is, theological. Maybe I’m prejudiced – can anybody enlighten a poor knuckle-dragging gnesio-Lutheran?

  7. johannes
    October 30th, 2009 at 18:39 | #7

    Based on what has happened in the ELCA, when all this talking and discussing starts, we should beware. The CTCR continues to discuss the service of women and has already taken watered down position on that subject–and the yakking and mental manipulation continues. Now it’s the seminaries’ turn–from DELTO to SMP–and the handwriting is appearing faintly on the wall. Time to kick some backside and take names. Who’s going to do it? Is this another plank in the JF platform? Check it out….

    j

  8. Ryan Fehrmann
    October 30th, 2009 at 21:03 | #8

    Fine reorganize it – turn Fort Wayne back to a Senior College, St Louis as the Sem – but for heaven’s sake sell the LCMS headquarters before you consider closing or closing/selling any of those seminaries, administration can be done anywhere, even in some of the buildings on a sem. campus.

  9. October 30th, 2009 at 21:11 | #9

    I suspect that the primary interest is not in closing the seminaries; but rather in the cash value of Concordia Seminary campus. Ft Wayne cannot be sold (conditions of acquition). Consider selling the St. Louis campus for $150 million (a price I have heard of). For $50 million relocate the faculty etc to Concordia Austin TX. More money and a seminary in Tx.

  10. Ryan Fehrmann
    October 30th, 2009 at 23:30 | #10

    Purple Palace is prime real estate over in Kirkwood off the hwy.

  11. C.S.
    October 31st, 2009 at 08:56 | #11

    From what I was once told the LCMS owns a large office complex on the other side of hwy 44 off of Watson Rd. as well.

  12. October 31st, 2009 at 22:10 | #12

    Beware of gifts bearing Greeks.

  13. October 31st, 2009 at 22:53 | #13

    Behold a Host Arrayed in Fright.

  14. Helen
    November 1st, 2009 at 13:23 | #14

    @Arthur Bolstad #9

    You may not be joking. There has been talk in Texas about a seminary here for decades. “After all, we’re 10% of LCMS… (and it snows! in Indiana).”
    [It's also hotter'n Houston in St. Louis but only a former Minnesotan would notice.] :)

  15. Helen
    November 1st, 2009 at 13:29 | #15

    @C.S. #11

    If we didn’t spend quite so much on offices and bureaucrats to fill them,
    we could afford missionaries and seminarians.

    P.S. I should have mentioned above that Concordia, Texas now has about 100 acres exclusive of the Nature Preserve. (Not long ago they ran a college on 20.)
    Texas District offices had 40 acres… the size of the original UT campus … but I’m thinking that some of that is on the block, if not already sold.

  16. Wyldeirishman
    November 1st, 2009 at 15:28 | #16

    @elnathan the Younger #6

    Don’t we have the LCEF to aid in such matters? But your point is valid: where’s the money really going?

  17. C.S.
    November 2nd, 2009 at 20:57 | #17

    Helen #15

    I was told this about 15 years ago by somebody who was renting office space in the building. They said the LCMS was their landlord. Apparently the LCMS didn’t need the whole building to themselves at that time. I do not know about the status of that office center today.

    I wonder about the ratio of LCMS bureaucrats to missionaries, seminarians, pastors and called teachers.

  18. Rev. Larry D. Wright
    November 3rd, 2009 at 17:05 | #18

    @Rev. Joel A. Brondos #12

    Rev. Brondos

    Is the word “gifts” in your comment meant to be the American meaning for the word gift or the German meaning for the word “gift.”

    Actually, come to think of it…it is painfully funny either way!
    Larry Wright

  19. BillTheSlink
    November 3rd, 2009 at 21:40 | #19

    As much as I want to be a pastor and the natural man in me would love to save money and sit at home on his butt in front of the computer like I did for my B.A., the spiritual man knows it would be far better to go to Ft. Wayne and live in the dorms with my fellow travelers, worship, pray, study, and grow with them. I was hoping to go to Ft. Wayne in two years since it is closer to Cincinnati than St. Louis and I can’t stand heat. I hope it’s still there when/if I am ready to go.

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.