As conventions resume, read the latest version of the BRTFSSG survey (by Pr. Charles Henrickson)

June 4th, 2009 Post by

On June 4, the Missouri Synod kicks off “District Convention Month,” with the remaining 26 (of the 35) conventions being held in a span of 34 days! (Here or here is a convention schedule.) At those district conventions, representatives of President Kieschnick’s Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance (BRTFSSG) will be allotted two hours of convention time, the first hour to make their presentation and conduct their survey, the second hour to take comments and questions from the floor.

It will be helpful for delegates and others attending the conventions to be prepared ahead of time. I encourage everyone to check out the materials linked on the BRTFSSG home page. In particular, please read carefully and critically the Current District Convention Report (either the 110-slide version or the 28-page version). This is the presentation you will be shown at your district convention (unless they have changed it . . . again).

Immediately after the presentation, you will be asked to respond to the BRTFSSG survey. There will be no time permitted for discussion between the presentation and the survey. So you will need to have thought through the presentation proposals and the related survey statements. I also enourage you to get some other views on the presentation and survey by going to the Interested Laymen’s site, blueribbonsurvey.org. And you can read my take on the proposals at steadfastlutherans.org. Those two sites are working with a previous version of the presentation and survey, so the order and wording won’t be exactly identical, but the gist of the content will be pretty much the same.

Which leads me to this. Here now, below, is the most recent version of the survey, with the wording and order as they appeared at the last convention held (CNH), in mid-May. (And here is a link to the pdf of the survey used at the CNH District Convention.)

Note: Section headings No. 1, No. 14, No. 15, No. 18, and No. 20 will call for your response on the scale of 5 (SA) to 1 (SD), as will of course all of the statements under all of the headings. The other section headings will not call for a response for the heading per se.

BRTFSSG

WALKING TOGETHER: THE LCMS FUTURE

______ DISTRICT CONVENTION FEEDBACK

RESPONDENT CATEGORY: (circle one)
1 – Voting Ordained, 2 – Voting Lay, 3 – Advisory Ordained, 4 – Advisory Lay, 5 – Advisory Commissioned, 6 – Other

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following by circling the appropriate number:
5 = Strongly agree (SA), 4 = Agree (A), 3 = Not sure (NS), 2 = Disagree (D), 1 = Strongly disagree (SD)

No. 1: Affirm in Our Governing Documents the Mission and Purpose of Our Synod

No. 2: Emphasize the Importance of Doctrinal Resolutions and Doctrinal Statements

2.1 Doctrinal resolutions of special significance and doctrinal statements will require a two-thirds vote at Synod convention.

2.2 Reaffirm, clarify, amplify, and strengthen Constitution (Art. VIII) and Bylaws to enhance doctrinal unity.

No. 3: Clarify the Categories of Membership in Our Synod

3.1 Congregations are the voting members of the Synod.

3.2 Ministers of Religion (ordained and commissioned) are members of the Synod who are eligible to serve as delegates of congregations to conventions of the Synod and its districts.

3.3 Laypeople, although not rostered members of the Synod itself, are closely linked to the Synod through their affiliation with member congregations of the Synod and are eligible to serve as delegates to conventions.

No. 4: Redefine Congregational Representation to District Conventions, Including Commissioned Members

Voting delegates at conventions shall be one of the called pastors of the congregation and one lay person or minister of religion–commissioned of the congregation.

No. 5: Determine Equitable Congregational Representation to District Conventions

5.1 Congregations with a pastoral vacancy are entitled to a vote by the vacancy pastor and one non-ordained vote.

5.2 Multiple-congregation parishes being served by one or more pastors are entitled to one pastoral vote, with each congregation in the parish having one non-ordained vote.

5.3 Congregations with more than 1,000 confirmed members are entitled to two additional votes, at least one being a layperson.

No. 6: Determine Congregational Representation to National Conventions

6.1 Determine each district’s number of delegates according to that district’s exact percentage of the total number of congregations and confirmed members in the Synod.

6.2 Allow each district to determine how these delegates would be selected.

6.3 Whichever method or system a district uses to choose its delegates, it would choose an equal number of ordained and non-ordained delegates.

No. 7: Establish a Fixed Number of Delegates to the National Convention

7.1 Establish a fixed number of total voting delegates to the national convention at approximately 650.

7.2 Amend the Bylaws to delete the “advisory delegate” category from national conventions and reduce the number of “advisory representatives.”

No. 8: Amend the Process of Submitting Overtures to National and District Conventions

8.1 Encourage the submission of overtures from congregations to their district conventions through circuit forums.

8.2 Encourage the submission of overtures from congregations to the Synod convention through their district conventions.

8.3 While all overtures submitted would still be considered, resolutions from circuit forums and district conventions would receive priority at district and Synod conventions, respectively.

No. 9: Amend the Frequency of District and National Conventions

Hold the district and national conventions in a four-year cycle.

No. 10: Restore Circuits to Their Primary Purpose

10.1 Allow districts flexibility in determining circuit configuration.

10.2 Circuit counselors would not be elected but rather appointed by the district president with the concurrence of the district board of directors, praesidium, and in consultation with the congregations of a given circuit.

No. 11: Consider Future District Configuration

11.1 Under convention-adopted criteria, the 2010 Synod convention directs the Council of Presidents to submit to the next Synod convention a recommendation with respect to the function and configuration of districts.

11.2 Reduce the number of districts to 15-25, each comprising approximately 200-400 congregations.

No. 12: Provide Collaborative and Efficient National Synod Structure

12.1 Implement process for Quadrennial Synod Priorities.

12.2 Realign national Synod ministries into two Mission Commissions:

12.21 Commission on International Mission

12.22 Commission on National Mission

12.23 Council staff execs report to Synod President

12.3 Provide coordination with districts for certain ministries.

12.4 Transfer some responsibilities to districts.

12.5 Transfer most BUE and BPE responsibilities to regents and BOD. (CUS would continue with certain responsibilities.)

No. 13: Involve the Totality of Congregations in the Election of Synod President and First Vice-President

13.1 Involve the totality of congregations in electing the Synod President and First Vice-President.

13.2 President and First Vice-President elected as a team.

No. 14: Arrange for Five Geographical Regions in the Synod

No. 15: Elect Synod Vice-Presidents Regionally

No. 16: Amend the Composition of Synod’s Board of Directors

16.1 The Board of Directors be composed of 17 voting members, as defined in the presentation.

16.2 First Vice-President, Secretary, and VP-Finance/Treasurer are non-voting members.

No. 17: Provide Consistency of Terms of Office and Term Limits

17.1 Elect or appoint all Synod and district officers and board and commission members to four-year terms.

17.2 Have no term limits for district presidents.

17.3 Have no term limits for any nationally elected board and commission members.

17.4 Districts may determine limits for their board and commission members and other officers.

No. 18: Priority of Synod Governing Documents

No. 19: Expand the Certification Process for Pastoral Candidates

19.1 In a collaborative effort with the seminaries, expand the responsibility for the final certification of pastoral candidates to include congregations being served, their district presidents, and circuit counselors.

19.2 This process would follow policies developed by the COP in consultation with the seminaries and currently in use in the Specific Ministry Pastor program.

19.3 Seminary faculties would continue to certify seminary Graduates’ satisfactory completion of initial requirements for Pastoral ministry.

No. 20: Consider a New Name for Our Synod

(Please write in your suggestion: _________________________________)

Your comments for the task force:






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Todd Wilken
    June 4th, 2009 at 00:43 | #1

    My prediction:

    By the end of the 34 days, President Kieschnick will be distancing himself from his own Task Force and its proposals.

    Will the quarterback be willing to carry this ball into the endzone? No.

    I might be wrong, but I don’t think so.

    TW

  2. June 4th, 2009 at 17:06 | #2

    “My prediction: By the end of the 34 days, President Kieschnick will be distancing himself from his own Task Force and its proposals.” –TW

    Could be, Todd. After we stopped him in Houston from getting his special convention, and then some weeks later, by the time of the COP meeting, when he realized his special convention idea wasn’t going over too well, Jerry backpedaled and tried to make it sound like it was his idea not to call a special convention!

    My sense is that the Blue Ribbon stuff is going over like a lead balloon. But like that guy in the new “Up” movie, Jerry has tied his house to that balloon! With a blue ribbon!

    What a legacy! The Kieschnick Legacy: Doctrine vs. mission; unionism and syncretism; ecclesiastical supervision; the “Great Commissions” (CCM and CTCR); exceptional delegates; Ablaze!/Fan into Flame; getting Schulz, Wilken, and Schwarz fired; plummeting membership, money, and missionaries; and now the transparent power grab that is Blue Ribbon Restructuring!

  3. Anonymous
    June 5th, 2009 at 00:41 | #3

    Add Noland to that list.

  4. Pr. Roger Sterle
    June 7th, 2009 at 22:20 | #4

    While the site will print out the 28 pages, why is it that you cannot simply make it into a file to keep on the computer? Or, have I missed something.
    Rev. Roger D. Sterle

  5. June 7th, 2009 at 23:01 | #5

    “While the site will print out the 28 pages, why is it that you cannot simply make it into a file to keep on the computer?” –RDS

    The problem is, you cannot copy and paste the TEXT of the presentation, in order to work with it, to discuss the text in e-mails, forums, blogs, websites, etc.

  6. June 8th, 2009 at 17:32 | #6

    New Jersey, Kansas, Nebraska, New England, and Atlantic just concluded their conventions. South Wisconsin is meeting as we speak. Can anyone report if the BRTFSSG survey is exactly (wording and order) the same as the one they did in CNH in May (posted above)? Is the presentation itself the same as the one linked at lcms.org? I’m curious if they’re staying with the same presentation and survey now or if they’re continuing to change them.

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.