On Making the Sign of the Cross

March 14th, 2014 Post by

Through the millennium physical gestures have accompanied those who have prayed to their “higher power”. Such physical gestures whatever they may be are “signifiers” that the individual is speaking to one who is unseen. It is the attitude of the heart that determines the use of these physical gestures.

In our prayer life as Lutherans Martin Luther encourages Christians to make the sign of the cross. This is seen in his Morning Prayer where he encourages:

Morning Prayer

In the morning when you get up, make the sign of the holy cross and say:

In the name of the Father and of the X Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Then, kneeling or standing, repeat the Creed and the Lord’s Prayer. If you choose, you may also say this little prayer:

I thank you, my heavenly Father, through Jesus Christ, You dear Son, that You have kept me this night from all harm and danger; and I pray that You would keep me this day also from sin and every evil, that all my doings and life may please You. For into Your hands I commend myself, my body and soul, and all things. Let Your holy angel be with me, that the evil foe may have no power over me. Amen. (The same encouragement and format is also found in Luther’s Evening Prayer.)

To make the sign of the cross one may observe this helpful illustrated example found in a most recent and delightful publication from CPH.[1] The physical actions are explained as follows:

“Touch your head at the naming of the Father; then bring your hand to the middle of your chest (over your heart) at the naming of the Son. At the naming of the Holy Spirit, touch your right shoulder and then your left shoulder.”[2]

Making the sign of the X cross in no manner makes one a superior Christian, more Lutheran, or somehow more confessional than those who for their own reasons chose not to. Such an action is to be entirely left up to Christian freedom with no coercion.

This “touching,” or “marking” the forehead is first seen in Scripture with the High Priest as he carried out his duties in the Tabernacle. “You shall make a plate of pure gold and engrave on it, like the engraving of a signet, ‘Holy to the LORD.’ And you shall fasten it on the turban by a cord of blue. It shall be on the front of the turban. It shall be on Aaron’s forehead…” (Ex 28:36-38a). It is in and through our Baptisms that we have been declared priests to serve the Lord Jesus. As priests “we are encouraged to be the people of God, the royal priesthood, and to let the vitality of the Lord flow in our daily living in service to our neighbors, both for their temporal needs and their eternal salvation”[3] This priestly identity upon our foreheads whereby we serve the risen Christ is seen in the New Testament which will be addressed shortly.

This theme of being marked upon our foreheads continues in Ezekiel. “And the LORD said to him, ‘Pass through the city, through Jerusalem, and put a mark on the foreheads of the men who sigh and groan over all the abominations that are committed in it’” (Ez 9:4). The righteous were spared from death and destruction (v. 5) when they received the “mark,” upon their foreheads. This “mark,” is a translation of the last letter of the ancient Hebrew alphabet called “tau.” In the ancient script it was made either in the form of a plus sign “+”, or, that of a multiplication sign, an “x”.[4] In the mind of God Christ was slain on a cross before the foundation of the world (Eph 1:4; 1 Pet 1:20; Rev 13:8) so it should not surprise us that this mark of the “tau” bears an uncanny resemblance to a cross!

This mark—this “tau”—which sets us apart from destruction and for eternal life with Christ is referenced in the Apocalypse. It is placed upon the foreheads of the baptized who are protected from the destruction and judgment that comes upon the ungodly while the victory song of the redeemed is sung. Our priestly status is seen in the subsequent verses:

  • “Do not harm the earth or the sea or the trees, until we have sealed the servants of our God on their foreheads” (Rev 7:3).
  • “They were told not to harm the grass of the earth or any green plant or any tree, but only those people who do not have the seal of God on their foreheads” (Rev 9:4).
  • “Then I looked, and behold, on Mount Zion stood the Lamb, and with him 144,000 who had his name and his Father’s name written on their foreheads” (Rev 14:1).
  • “They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads” (Rev 22:4).

This “mark” which sets us apart as being holy to the Lord is symbolically placed upon us in the rite of Holy Baptism. Prior to the actual washing with water the pastor “… makes the sign of the holy cross upon the forehead and heart of each candidate while saying:   Name   , receive the sign of the holy cross both upon your X forehead and upon your X heart to mark you as one redeemed by Christ the crucified.’”[5] Shortly thereafter the new birth in the womb of Holy Baptism occurs when the thrice holy name of Yahweh is spoken with the application of water and said individual is set apart from destruction for life eternal.

As far as I am able to determine there are seven physical actions or movements embraced by people the world over to accompany prayer. They are:

  1. Upstretched hands
  2. Bowing the head
  3. Closing one’s eyes
  4. Folding one’s hands
  5. Kneeling
  6. Prostrating oneself on the ground
  7. Making the sign of the X cross

All seven forms of prayer have in the church’s history been employed at different times and in their proper context are quite acceptable. Today, six of these forms are employed by non-Christians. In today’s context the seventh form; “making the sign of the X cross” is unmistakably and uniquely Christian which cannot be said of the other forms. Making the sign of the cross is so uniquely Christian it would never be used by a non-Christian. It is a “signifier” much as is a woman’s burqa in Islam or a clerical shirt among liturgical Christians. When seen in the public market burqas and clerical shirts draw eyes and subtle shifts of the head. The employment of these signifiers speaks volumes. Might not making the sign of the X cross do the same in bearing unmistakable witness to the resurrected Christ?

People in our nation are becoming more and more spiritual as Christianity continues to decline. Opportunities to witness abound. Perhaps there is more to Luther’s encouragement to make the sign of the X cross than what would initially seem to us—especially in light of the rich Biblical witness and the presence of Islam in southeastern Europe in Luther’s day. In conclusion I commend these gentle words from that most recent delightful publication from CPH:

Again, to make the sign of the cross is a matter of Christian freedom. You may or may not feel comfortable doing it yourself, or you may not do it as often as your neighbor. That’s okay. But when the sign of the cross is made, whether by pastor or people, let this be the proclamation: Christ has died for your sins upon the cross; in Baptism he shares that cross with you; because you share in His cross, you are a child of God and are precious in His sight.[6]

 

 



[1] Scot Kinnaman, gen. ed., Lutheranism 101 (St. Louis: Concordia, 2010): 231-232.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Robert C. Baker, gen. ed., Lutheran Spirituality: Life as God’s Child (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2010), 246.

[4] “Study Note Ezekiel 9:4,” in The Lutheran Study Bible, Edward Engelbrecht, gen., ed. (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2009), p. 1321, Ezekiel 9:4.

[5] Lutheran Service Book, prepared by the Commission on Worship of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2006), Rite of Holy Baptism pp. 268 – 271.

[6] Kinnaman, ibid.


Categories: Pastor Karl Weber Tags:




Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. March 14th, 2014 at 10:50 | #1

    Here’s a question I was asked that I’ve never been able to find a “definitive” answer to: For those wishing to make the sign of the cross during the divine service, at what moments would that be most appropriate? Invocation, benediction, and ???

  2. GlennS
    March 14th, 2014 at 11:18 | #2

    Thank you for that lesson. That adds depth and meaning to the practice which I have become more comfortable with and grown to appreciate. I use it during the invocation, benediction, creed, blessing after communion, and Lord’s Prayer.

    As a fun side track, you can see the sign used in popular Hollywood movies. I’ve only seen it used one time, “right shoulder left shoulder”. In “Enemy at the Gate”, a movie about World War II Stalingrad, a Russian soldier (ironically) shortly before shot by a sniper, uses the “right shoulder left shoulder rather than the left to right used by Catholics.

  3. Joe Krohn
    March 14th, 2014 at 11:39 | #3

    @Jeff Samelson #1
    Typically the Invocation, Benediction, and where the forgiveness of sins is pronounced/referenced (absolution and Lord’s Supper, the creed)

  4. David
    March 14th, 2014 at 11:47 | #4

    @Jeff Samelson #1
    I have a brochure from another congregation that gives a detailed explanation of appropriate places to make the sign of the cross, but I can’t remember from whence it came. It lists the invocation, the absolution, the Gloria in Excelsis (in the middle of the trinitarian formula), end of the Creed, the Sanctus (at “blessed is He who cometh in the name of the Lord”), seventh petition of the Lord’s Prayer, at the elevation of the host and the cup in the Words of Institution, the Pax Domini, before and after receiving Christ’s body and blood, at the dismissal from the Lord’s Supper, and the Benediction.

  5. March 14th, 2014 at 12:01 | #5

    Jeff,

    The LSB writers included a little cross symbol at places where people traditionally make the sign of the cross. There are a number of other times as well as Joe indicated above, as well as others. Really, any time you want to remember your baptism. :)

  6. Tuomas J. Salo
    March 14th, 2014 at 14:04 | #6

    It’s very interesting that you Americans make the sign of the cross from right to left, since in Finland it’s the other way around (among those of us who actually make the sign). Around here, the more devout Eastern Orthodox are spotted miles away when they pass one of their churches and make the sign.

  7. helen
    March 14th, 2014 at 16:02 | #7

    Just don’t be so energetic that your elbow hits your neighbor.
    Or so conspicuous that others think you are doing it to be seen doing it.

  8. March 14th, 2014 at 16:32 | #8

    Joe, David, Sandra, thanks for the input! Clearly, though — and appropriately for us as Lutherans — there is no “canon law” on the question. Maybe now, though, I’ll have to break down and finally get a copy of LSB.

  9. March 14th, 2014 at 17:17 | #9

    I have always made the sign of the cross from forehead to breast, then from left shoulder to right shoulder and returning to the center. I was once told that this was the thing that distinguished Lutherans from Roman Catholics, although I learned to make the sign of the cross from my formerly Roman Catholic mother. I don’t make the cross the way I do to be Lutheran or noon-catholic, I just make it the way I am accustomed to make it.

    And during worship, if the pastor makes the sign of the cross, it seems appropriate for the laity to do so also. But there is no law. Do it when it seems right. It is done to focus the heart and mind on the source of our salvation and blessings, Christ and the cross.

  10. Pastor McCall
    March 14th, 2014 at 18:13 | #10

    Has no one seen the movie “Austin Powers”?! Best line ever on remembering which direction to go when making the sign of the cross (though a little coarse). :-)

  11. helen
    March 14th, 2014 at 20:28 | #11

    @Pastor McCall #10
    Best line ever on remembering which direction to go when making the sign of the cross…

    I was taught that right/left or left/right didn’t matter; some do it exactly as their pastor does and others, having learned facing him, do a mirror image of his action. Neither was it a cause for great concern how you placed your fingers. It’s not about you.

    Ministers’ mileage may vary. [Especially if they think “coarse” is clever] ;(

  12. Jais H. Tinglund
    March 14th, 2014 at 21:38 | #12

    @Pastor McCall #10
    Ooooo, behave (pronuniation: rhymes with five).

  13. Thomas
    March 14th, 2014 at 21:51 | #13

    I always thought that it was head, chest, left shoulder, right shoulder, then chest again.

  14. T-rav
    March 15th, 2014 at 00:09 | #14

    @Pastor McCall #10

    LOL. Yes, it’s coarse, but it’s also how I remember. For some reason the right, left directional method has always confused me on making the sign of the cross.

  15. Tim S.
    March 15th, 2014 at 01:02 | #15

    I use right to left because I’m not Roman Catholic.

  16. Jais Tinglund
    March 15th, 2014 at 07:22 | #16

    Tim S. :
    I use right to left because I’m not Roman Catholic.

    If that is your premise, wouldn’t you then be making yourself Eastern Orthodox by doing something the same way the Eastern Orthodox do it?

  17. JoyfulNoise
    March 15th, 2014 at 19:56 | #17

    @Jeff Samelson #8

    Every home should have one. There is a wealth of good information in it, including prayers.

  18. Caroline Mueller
    March 15th, 2014 at 21:40 | #18

    Pastor Ernie Lassman says it doesn’t matter which direction you go. However, Eastern Orthodox traditionally have gone right to left.

  19. helen
    March 15th, 2014 at 21:44 | #19

    @Jais H. Tinglund #12

    Luther, so often invoked, was not on the WWW, giving unfavorable impressions to the public.
    [Then, as now, they could invent enough without help.]

    I missed the movie so I don’t know if the buffs go East or West. ;)

  20. helen
    March 15th, 2014 at 22:03 | #20

    @Caroline Mueller #18

    Thanks for the video, Caroline. I’ve heard a good bit about Pr. Lassman from former parishioners of his, now transferred here.

  21. Jais H. Tinglund
    March 15th, 2014 at 22:50 | #21

    @helen #19
    My guess is West …

  22. Tim S.
    March 16th, 2014 at 00:46 | #22

    Jais Tinglund :

    Tim S. :I use right to left because I’m not Roman Catholic.

    If that is your premise, wouldn’t you then be making yourself Eastern Orthodox by doing something the same way the Eastern Orthodox do it?

    Nope.

  23. Jais Tinglund
    March 16th, 2014 at 07:40 | #23

    Tim S. :

    Jais Tinglund :

    Tim S. :I use right to left because I’m not Roman Catholic.

    If that is your premise, wouldn’t you then be making yourself Eastern Orthodox by doing something the same way the Eastern Orthodox do it?

    Nope.

    Interesting. How not?

  24. Bill P.
    March 16th, 2014 at 14:52 | #24

    I use left to right based on my previous Pastors suggestion; from heaven to earth to the heart.

  25. John Rixe
    March 16th, 2014 at 17:28 | #25

    …or as one of our vicars taught the kids:  It can also be a silent confession of the creed.

    Head – Lord Jesus Christ came down from heaven
    Chest – Incarnate
    Right shoulder – Crucified
    Left shoulder – Lives in my heart

  26. Matthew Mills
    March 17th, 2014 at 14:56 | #26

    Well, this is certainly the most trivial of the differences between Western and Eastern Christianity, but personally, if I go w/ the Western church on the big ticket items (vicarious atonement, Theosis etc.) it seems consistent to cross myself left to right. I’d rather be inadvertently thought Roman Catholic, than Eastern Orthodox.
    Lenten Blessings+,
    -Matt Mills

  27. Jais H. Tinglund
    March 17th, 2014 at 16:20 | #27

    @Matthew Mills #26
    Trivial, indeed.

    Somehow it would seem to me that how a Lutheran makes the sign of the cross would have very little to do with making a choice between on the one hand justification by gradual transformation and on the other justification by works – about as little as making the sign of the cross to begin with has to do with embracing any other nonsense taught in the Eastern churches, but not by the Roman Catholic Church, or vice versa, or any of the nonsense the East and Rome have in common.

    To me, the very idea that because something is done this way in one heretical church body, one has to do that something the way it is done in another heretical church body – well, it just seems a little silly to begin with.

    After all, if you are going to make the sign of the cross, you are going to have to do it one way or the other. You cannot not – well, you could, of course, but that would the choice of not making the sign of the cross at all.

    Of course one could alternate, perhaps, because one is neither Eastern Orthodox, nor Roman Catholic.

    But then, of course, somebody might argue that by doing so one would be both. I am not really sure how that would work.

    Overall, things would be rather complicated, were there any merit to the premise that one can only make the sign of the cross the way Roman Catholics do it if one is Roman Catholic.

    I feel pretty fortunate, though, to be fairly convinced that there is not much merit to that premise. For that means that one can do whatever one prefers without ascribing any significance to either. And it means that I do not have to care.

    I am much more comfortable with that. It makes me feel less silly.

    I am aware of the irony that I have cared enough to post all this.
    And I would not object if anybody would characterise these musing as somewhat silly. I am having a little down time, and find myself unable to wrap my head around something worthwhile.

  28. jb
    March 18th, 2014 at 17:33 | #28

    I am a bit amazed that so elementary a subject would have elicited so many comments.

  29. Jais H. Tinglund
    March 19th, 2014 at 11:33 | #29

    jb :
    I am a bit amazed that so elementary a subject would have elicited so many comments.

    Some topics will do that, I guess, inconsequential in themselves as they are, because they are usually not conversed about (conversation might be limited to the judgemental comments and snide remarks of the unenlightened uninterested in enlightenment – which can hardly be referred to as conversation), and when these topics are finally brought up in a positive perspective it is like water falling on dry land: it gives as sense of relief, and sudden realisation that one has thoughts one would like to express on this topic, now that the occasion is finally there.

  30. Nate Bargmann
    March 25th, 2014 at 09:01 | #30

    In our congregation parishioners signing themselves with the cross is not practiced. Probably too much conservative German heritage involved. Our pastor does it at points during the liturgy and then signs the congregation during the benediction. Certainly, I would find no harm in anyone choosing to do so during the liturgy as well. I do wonder that if suddenly my doing so might cause some to sin against the Eighth Commandment (there’s that conservative German thinking again!) unless such demonstrations were discussed and encouraged by the voters assembly and noted in the bulletin (that seems awfully legalistic, doesn’t it?).

    Recently, at the funeral for a long time friend I noticed one woman curtsied in the aisle before entering the pew. I have no idea of her religious affiliation or even who she was, but it caught my eye only because doing so is not a common practice in our congregation. I prefer to err on the side of attributing such actions to personal respect for our Savior on the part of those who do them than to fall into the trap of breaking the Eighth Commandment.

  31. Diane
    March 25th, 2014 at 09:50 | #31

    @Nate Bargmann #30
    Hi Nate,
    Your comments are insightful to me because in my congregation, making the sign of the cross is not regularly practiced by a majority of members. I have found that the more catechesis a congregation is given, especially in Luther’s Small Catechism, one will notice things like making the sign of the cross, etc. I’m old enough to remember that when one entered and sat down in the pew on Sunday morning, you bowed your head and said a silent prayer. That little action of Lutheran piety is practically nonexistent today. Everyone is more intent on greeting one another and making sure we Lutherans are ‘friendly’. However, I wouldn’t worry about breaking the Eighth Commandment so much, especially concerning outward expressions of Lutheran piety.

    I think what the woman did at the funeral is to genuflect, not curtsy. She probably comes from the Roman Catholic tradition where the practice is to bow towards the altar before entering the pew.

    In Christ,
    Diane

  32. Jais H. Tinglund
    March 25th, 2014 at 10:17 | #32

    @Diane #31
    The woman can have come from many different backgrounds, denominational, ethnic, and/or cultural. There really is a plethora of liturgical traditions out there.

    More importantly, (and, for the record, this I am not directing at you) it seems to me that there is something wrong with people keeping a watchful eye on and making judgements about how other people conduct themselves in their worship (provided, of course, that they are not being provocatively demonstrative about it so as to disturb even those who are indeed minding their own worship business) – or putting it to a vote or writing in the bulletin which (discrete) liturgical practices they are allowed to observe for themselves during their (personal and private) participation in worship.

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.