Trouble stirring at Concordia Chicago

February 22nd, 2014 Post by

concordia_1Yesterday it was brought to light that there is trouble stirring up at Concordia University in Chicago. The issue can be seen on this link that the Psychology Department at CUC is possibly allowing students to complete an internship with Planned Parenthood (at least they did allow it in 2012). The description of Planned Parenthood is found on the site as:

“PPIL is a respected leader in educating Illinoisans about sexual and reproductive health. We deliver age appropriate, comprehensive and medically accurate information that empowers women, men, teens, and families to make informed choices and lead healthy lives. PPIL is proud of its vital role in providing young people with honest sexuality and relationship information in classrooms, in communities,and online.”

Nothing is said about abortion, birth control, or the eugenic ideology that is at the foundation of Planned Parenthood. It would be easy at a time like this to condemn the entire university, or try to point fingers and accuse certain parties of the wrongdoing. However, this is not beneficial, nor is it in keeping with the 8th commandment. What we as a Church need to do right now is pray for the faithful Lutheran confessors at CUC – that they will see this information and act in accordance with their calling. Please pray for the Theology Faculty and for all those at CUC who are opposed to this curriculum. In addition, please be prudent and call the University if you have questions. Is Planned Parenthood a wicked organization that destroys life? Yes, it is. That is not the argument here. The issue is that this is stopped and faithful proclamation takes place. Let’s follow the 8th commandment and seek concord in this matter and pray for the guidance of Sacred Scripture.

Stay tuned to Steadfast Lutherans as we will try to cover this as it unfolds further.






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Thomas
    March 1st, 2014 at 13:33 | #1

    @Justus #49

    Moreover, do we really live in a society where homosexuals are routinely “harassed” and “discriminated” against? Of course, there are instances of violence against gays (which is sinful as well), but by and large homosexuality is widely celebrated and people who oppose it are condemned and themselves marginalized. When you receive personal congratulatory phone calls from the President for simply announcing publicly that you like to have sexual relations with the same gender, it’s pretty hard to see how gays are a terrified minority cowering in the shadows.

  2. Jais H. Tinglund
    March 1st, 2014 at 13:46 | #2

    Justus :
    Should homosexuals be harassed and discriminated against at Concordia-Portland?

    If “harassed” and “discriminated against” in this context are defined as “being forced to live with the fact that people who believe in God, and who also think that the Bible disapproves of sexual relations between persons of the same gender, exist, and are allowed to exist”, or anything along those lines (the way “harassed” and “discriminated against” are defined, implicitly or explicitly, in so many other contexts these days), then homosexuals at Concordia Portland should indeed be harassed and discriminated against, as should everybody else everywhere else.
    Otherwise – obviously – not …

  3. Justus
    March 1st, 2014 at 13:53 | #3

    Thomas :
    @Justus #49
    Homosexuality is sinful. Like all sinful conduct, it is “un-Lutheran” to condone, excuse, celebrate, and promote it.

    None of those were the stated goals of the organization in question.

  4. Justus
    March 1st, 2014 at 13:54 | #4

    Jais H. Tinglund :

    Justus :
    Should homosexuals be harassed and discriminated against at Concordia-Portland?

    If “harassed” and “discriminated against” in this context are defined as “being forced to live with the fact that people who believe in God, and who also think that the Bible disapproves of sexual relations between persons of the same gender, exist, and are allowed to exist”, or anything along those lines (the way “harassed” and “discriminated against” are defined, implicitly or explicitly, in so many other contexts these days), then homosexuals at Concordia Portland should indeed be harassed and discriminated against, as should everybody else everywhere else.
    Otherwise – obviously – not …

    I have no idea what you are saying.

  5. helen
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:06 | #5

    @Mark Louderback #27
    Well, technically I am forced to read BJS to be sure that a post has not started about me without my being informed. :)

    There’s an app to tell you that.
    Apply to PTMcCain (who would appear at the mention of his name or CPH, but I think he’s been barred here).
    [Or CarlVehse (who has not) will supply the information.]

    You aren’t forced to write, whether you are mentioned or not. ; )

  6. Thomas
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:10 | #6

    @Justus #3

    So “The Unity Club” regards homosexuality as sinful? Or does it it accept homosexuality as a legitimate behavior on par with heterosexuality and consider it “harassment” when other people refuse to accept it as well? If you think that organizations like The Unity Club don’t condone and approve of homosexuality then you’re being intentionally naive.

  7. John Rixe
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:25 | #7

    @helen #5

    You aren’t forced to write, whether you are mentioned or not. ; )

    He is absolutely forced to write.  Please see comment #29, pg 4.

  8. Jais H. Tinglund
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:25 | #8

    Justus :

    Jais H. Tinglund :

    Justus :
    Should homosexuals be harassed and discriminated against at Concordia-Portland?

    If “harassed” and “discriminated against” in this context are defined as “being forced to live with the fact that people who believe in God, and who also think that the Bible disapproves of sexual relations between persons of the same gender, exist, and are allowed to exist”, or anything along those lines (the way “harassed” and “discriminated against” are defined, implicitly or explicitly, in so many other contexts these days), then homosexuals at Concordia Portland should indeed be harassed and discriminated against, as should everybody else everywhere else.
    Otherwise – obviously – not …

    I have no idea what you are saying.

    I am sorry for that – in more ways than one.
    I am sure, though, that you will be able to find somebody capable of reading at an adult level who will be glad to explain it to you, or just somebody capable of reading who will be glad to read it to you, or – whatever stands in your way , I am sure somebody will be glad to help you …

  9. John Rixe
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:32 | #9

    @Jais H. Tinglund #8

    Respectfully, I don’t understand it either.   I’m not necessarily disagreeing.  Maybe please break it up into short sentences.  Thanks.

  10. Justus
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:34 | #10

    Jais,

    I’ll let your comment stand as I see no reason to respond.

  11. helen
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:35 | #11

    @John Rixe #7
    John Rixe: Mark Louderback built his own reputation here and elsewhere.
    No further comment; I don’t think he’s the topic here.

  12. Justus
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:38 | #12

    Thomas :
    @Justus #3
    So “The Unity Club” regards homosexuality as sinful? Or does it it accept homosexuality as a legitimate behavior on par with heterosexuality and consider it “harassment” when other people refuse to accept it as well? If you think that organizations like The Unity Club don’t condone and approve of homosexuality then you’re being intentionally naive.

    From what has been linked, the “Unity Club” has a charter that describes the goal of the organization. It is (from the Concordia-Portland official website):

    “Unity Club provides a safe gathering place for discussion of issues related to homosexual orientation, in particular the harassment, discrimination or otherwise un-Christian treatment of marginalized groups. Unity Club aims to help all students grow in friendship, knowledge, faith and service, making the University a safe place to study, understand, and minister for all.”

    The goals listed in such a charter are fully in consonance with those of the LCMS. While innuendo may be the basis for anonymous internet criticism, it is not a basis upon which approval of a given student organization may be based. Groups are approved based upon their stated goals.

  13. Thomas
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:41 | #13

    @John Rixe #7

    How is on earth is anybody forced to respond to something written on an internet blog? He can simply choose to ignore the whole thing. My personal feeing is that Mr. Louderback likes the attention and enjoys responding. After all, he did bring himself up on this thread completely of his own volition.

  14. March 1st, 2014 at 14:46 | #14

    Justus :
    Fascinating.
    From the OregonLive article cited upstream: “Scott Cozza, who lives in Vancouver, is co-founder of the Gay Straight Coalition at Concordia. The group, which Cozza said is not recognized by the university…”
    So Concordia-Portland does not recognize it and therefore has no control over it.

    The lack of “recognition” by the university does not mean that the university does not have control over it. Moreover, this is beside the point.

    The Unity Club, which is recognized, has a purpose which is, from the same article: “to provide a safe gathering place for discussion of issues related to homosexual orientation, in particular the harassment, discrimination or otherwise un-Christian treatment of marginalized groups.”

    The university has a duty as a Christian institution in loco parentis to place limits on this sort of propaganda. To describe the phenomenon of homosexuality as an “orientation” is only to compound the problem. You may as well have a club for students who wish to be open about their kleptomania and have it not only condoned but celebrated by the student body and administration.

    Should homosexuals be harassed and discriminated against at Concordia-Portland? Is a group that advocates that this not happen somehow un-Lutheran? Is a university that would host a group who seeks to make sure certain groups are not discriminated against or harassed un-Lutheran for doing so?

    This is a complete and total red herring, for of course the purpose of this club on Concordia’s campus is not merely to advocate that “homosexual” students not be harassed or unfairly discriminated against — not at all. Like their counterparts all across this country, this group advocates sodomy as a good, admirable, and even courageous thing. Unless they seek to aid students who struggle with homoerotic tendencies to live chaste and celibate lives, they have no place on a Christian university campus.

    I do not know you, Justus, so I do not wish to assume anything regarding where you are coming from. But homosexuals are not “a group” in any defined sense, and they are certainly not marginalized in Portland, Oregon. And I know what I am talking about — I’ve lived in the Willamette Valley for twenty years.

  15. Thomas
    March 1st, 2014 at 14:48 | #15

    @Justus #12

    You didn’t respond at all to what I wrote. You just reiterated the Unity Club charter. Confessional Lutheranism does not approve of homosexual activity, because it it sinful. If the Unity Club were devoted to helping people cease engaging in homosexual activity, that would be in accord with Lutheranism. However, it seems highly unlikely that the purpose of this organization is to condemn sinful conduct. Rather, based on their charter, it seems much more likely that they want to create an environment were all groups, gays included, feel as though their behavior is perfectly acceptable. By the way, are gays facing a wave of harassment and discrimination at this (or any university)? This whole debate is pretty silly. You and I both know that The Unity Club has no interest in helping people change their sinful behavior.

  16. Jais H. Tinglund
    March 1st, 2014 at 15:02 | #16

    @John Rixe #9
    You do surprise me a bit, Mr. Rixe, but since you are not being rude about it I shall give it another whirl.

    I think we are all very aware that it has become common in recent years to throw terms such as “discrimination” or “harassment” or “hate” against anybody who publicly expresses the belief that Holy Scripture disapproves of sexual relations between persons of the same gender – and that what Holy Scripture teaches is truth from God – in other words: that homosexual activity goes against the will of God.

    I think we have also all become aware of the policy of some, that people who espouse such beliefs should not be allowed to exist, or at least not be allowed to earn a living; their businesses should be boycotted, and the businesses of anyone who does business with them, or anyone who does business with anyone doing business with the,. and they themselves should be removed from the television shows in which they appear, etc. …

    This being the case, one cannot immediately assume, when a group states that its purpose is “to provide a safe gathering place for discussion of issues related to homosexual orientation, in particular the harassment, discrimination or otherwise un-Christian treatment of marginalized groups”, that this is not code for working out strategies to force Christians into silence through legislation, litigation, boycott, harassment, social isolation, or similar means.

    As such, given the current climate in the realm of public discourse, a question such as whether or not homosexuals at Portland-Oregon should be “harassed” or “discriminated against” cannot be answered without first having established within which parameters and definitions the one inquiring is operating. Or in other words: whether or not the question is really whether or not Christians should be allowed at Concordia-Portland, and be allowed to confess their faith and express their opinions. For that could very well be the meaning of the question.

    I am not very good with expressing myself in short sentences, alas, at least not in writing. Short sentences just seem to go against my nature; expressing myself in short sentences bores me immensely. And my desire to express myself in manners amusing to myself tends to get the better of me. At any rate, I hope you will find this comprehensible.

  17. John Rixe
    March 1st, 2014 at 15:07 | #17

    @Jais H. Tinglund #16

    Good job. (short sentence) :)

  18. John Rixe
    March 1st, 2014 at 15:32 | #18

    @helen #5

    BTW it’s easy to set up an alert. Just go to google.com/alerts

  19. March 1st, 2014 at 17:19 | #19

    From what has been linked, the “Unity Club” has a charter that describes the goal of the organization. It is (from the Concordia-Portland official website):
    “Unity Club provides a safe gathering place for discussion of issues related to homosexual orientation, in particular the harassment, discrimination or otherwise un-Christian treatment of marginalized groups. Unity Club aims to help all students grow in friendship, knowledge, faith and service, making the University a safe place to study, understand, and minister for all.”
    The goals listed in such a charter are fully in consonance with those of the LCMS. While innuendo may be the basis for anonymous internet criticism, it is not a basis upon which approval of a given student organization may be based. Groups are approved based upon their stated goals.

    The goals in the charter are NOT in consonance with the LCMS. This group is anathema to us and our church body.

    Justus, do you believe that homosexuality is absolutely sinful and an abomination?

    And if anyone doubts that this club supports homosexuality, transgenderism, etc., just look at their Facebook page and Facebook group:

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Concordia-Unity-Club/300682506610182

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/668772776485531/ (This one is their facebook group. As long as you have a facebook account, you can see it.)

  20. Justus
    March 1st, 2014 at 17:26 | #20

    The goals in the charter are NOT in consonance with the LCMS. This group is anathema to us and our church body.

    So the LCMS’ goals are to discriminate against and harass gay people?

  21. March 1st, 2014 at 17:30 | #21

    Justus :

    The goals in the charter are NOT in consonance with the LCMS. This group is anathema to us and our church body.

    So the LCMS’ goals are to discriminate and harass gay people?

    Did I say that? You demonstrate yourself to be a dishonest liar, like all supporters of sex perversion.

    The group’s claim to be against “discrimination” is propaganda. Homosexuals are not being discriminated against. The groups purpose is to promote acceptance of homosexuality and transgenderism, which are satanic.

    I will ask again, do you believe that homosexuality and transgenderism are absolutely sinful and an abomination? Do you believe that this group should be banned at CU Portland, or do you support the existence of this club? And are you an LCMS member or not?

  22. March 1st, 2014 at 17:36 | #22

    On their “About” page, the “Unity Club” writes:

    “Unity Club tries to raise awareness to students and staff/faculty through speakers and documentaries, attending events in the city of Portland, and leading seminars about Safe Space Ally Training.”

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Concordia-Unity-Club/300682506610182?id=300682506610182&sk=info

    This is the kind of thing they’re referring to:

    http://www.brandeis.edu/glbtq/outallies/index.html

    http://www.sandiego.edu/unitedfront/programs/safe_space_allies/

  23. Thomas
    March 1st, 2014 at 18:03 | #23

    @Justus #20

    The “goal” of the LCMS is to help bring people to salvation by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ. Celebrating and promoting homosexuality or any other kind of sinful activity is not the goal of an orthodox Lutheran church body.

  24. Justus
    March 1st, 2014 at 18:18 | #24

    Nicholas :

    Justus :

    The goals in the charter are NOT in consonance with the LCMS. This group is anathema to us and our church body.

    So the LCMS’ goals are to discriminate and harass gay people?

    Did I say that? You demonstrate yourself to be a dishonest liar, like all supporters of sex perversion.

    Baloney. I have quoted the stated goals of the organization in the charter, which are to work against the discrimination and harassment of gay people. You are the one who said that those goals are, to quote you, “NOT in consonance with the LCMS.”

    If there is dishonest lying going around, it is not on my behalf. Own what you say.

  25. Justus
    March 1st, 2014 at 18:20 | #25

    Thomas :
    @Justus #20
    The “goal” of the LCMS is to help bring people to salvation by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ. Celebrating and promoting homosexuality or any other kind of sinful activity is not the goal of an orthodox Lutheran church body.

    And again, where do you find the “celebrating and promoting of homosexuality or any other kind of sinful activity” in the charter?

    Of course, it is not there. You are making this up out of whole cloth.

  26. March 1st, 2014 at 18:21 | #26

    @Justus #24

    Answer my questions. Is homosexuality absolutely sinful and an abomination or not? Are you an LCMS member or not?

  27. March 1st, 2014 at 18:22 | #27

    @Justus #25

    And you are ignoring the sodomy club’s own online material on Facebook, which I have provided above.

  28. Jonathan Skorupski
    March 1st, 2014 at 18:43 | #28

    Nicholas :
    @Justus #24
    Answer my questions. Is homosexuality absolutely sinful and an abomination or not? Are you an LCMS member or not?

    Same-sex sexual behavior is sinful. I am LCMS.

  29. Thomas
    March 1st, 2014 at 18:45 | #29

    @Justus #25

    I notice that you seem to be avoiding a lot of direct questions. That makes me wonder what exactly your agenda is here. If you’re willing to believe that a The Unity Club has no interest in promoting the acceptance of homosexuality as just another “orientation,” you’re of course free to do so. That is not the goal of any orthodox Lutheran church body. Our goal is to bring to people to salvation by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ. Condoning opening sinful conduct is at odds with that mission.

  30. March 1st, 2014 at 19:41 | #30

    Pr. Rossow published an excellent post on this ongoing “Unity Club” scandal back in 2010: http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=12535

  31. March 1st, 2014 at 20:38 | #31

    @Thomas #28

    Indeed, anyone who views the Youtube video (discretion advised) posted on their facebook page on March 18, 2012, or who reads the HuffPo propaganda posted there on June 14, 2012 will see that the Unity Club’s intention is clearly to promote the acceptance of homosexuality itself:

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Concordia-Unity-Club/300682506610182

    And on their facebook group there is a link from August 10, 2013 to a post from a homosexual activist website offensively called “thenewcivilrightsmovement.com” which blasts the Russian government for banning the promotion of homosexuality to children:

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/668772776485531/

Comment pages
1 3 4 5 35629
If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.