Book of Concord Website — Confession – Confutation – Defense

July 12th, 2013 Post by

BOCcoverOne of the goals of Brothers of John the Steadfast is to encourage laity in reading and studying the Book of Concord. The easiest to understand version of this is the Readers Edition produced by CPH in 2006. This is most convenient if you are reading a book, studying it in bible class, or enjoying it on your kindle, ebook, or in LOGOS. But many of us want to refer to passages from it online.

The Book of Concord website was a labor of love for Pastor Paul McCain for many years, and then, I offered to help Paul redesign the site and add many more resources to it. We continue to work together to gather materials and get them all organized and up on the site whenever we find something new and helpful for the site. I’ve been particularly involved in the coding on the site and getting everything organized so it is easier to move around the documents.

One of the things that I really like about the Book of Concord website is the ability to see the Augsburg Confession, the Roman Confutation (the reply by the Roman Emperor), and then the defense of the Augsburg Confession using the links under each article (shown below).

BOC-confession-confutation-defense

Here’s the page describing this feature on the Book of Concord website:

As you are reading the Augsburg Confession and the Apology to the Augsburg Confession, you will see to the right “Confession-Confutation-Defense”. This is a reference to the Augsburg Confession, the Roman Catholic reply, called the “Confutation” and then the Defense, which is the Lutheran Apology, or Defense, of the Augsburg Confession. We have provided a method to read each article of the confession, view the Roman response in the Confutation, then view the associated article in the Defense. Note that the Confutation is NOT in the Book of Concord, but is a document written by the Roman Church in response to the presentation of the Augsburg Confession.

To understand the history of these documents, here is part of the Book of Concord Web Site’s introduction to the Confutation, available here:

After the Lutherans presented the Augsburg Confession, on June 25, 1530, the Roman rulers and leaders met on June 26, and on June 27 presented the Emperor with a report that called for a response to the Augsburg Confession. Various options were considered for responding to the Lutherans, and on July 5, the Emperor commanded that a confutation be prepared and that the Lutherans submit to his judgment. John Eck, who worked with John Faber, Conrad Wimpina, and John Cochlaeus, led the Roman theologians charged with the preparation of the Confutation. They were ordered to be moderate in their response.

The introduction to the Apology (Defense), titled Phillip Melanchthon’s Greeting, helps also to put these documents in context (available here).

 

To understand why I like it so much, here’s an example. Looking at AC XIII:

1] Of the Use of the Sacraments they teach that the Sacraments were ordained, not only to be marks of profession among men, but rather to be signs and testimonies of the will of God 2] toward us, instituted to awaken and confirm faith in those who use them. Wherefore we must so use the Sacraments that faith be added to believe the promises which are offered and set forth through the Sacraments.

3] They therefore condemn those who teach that the Sacraments justify by the outward act, and who do not teach that, in the use of the Sacraments, faith which believes that sins are forgiven, is required.

Clicking on the “Confutation” link under this text, you find the reply from the Roman Emperor:

The thirteenth article gives no offence, but is accepted, while they say that the sacraments were instituted not only to be marks of profession among men, but rather to be signs and testimonies of God’s will toward us; nevertheless, we must request them that what they here ascribe to the sacraments in general they confess also specifically concerning the seven sacraments of the Church and take measures for the observance of them by their subjects.

In other words, they are fine with our statement, but then expanded on it to make sure that all seven sacraments of the Roman Church were observed.

After reading the Roman response, you can click on “Defense” and read the detailed response by the Lutheran Princes. This is 23 paragraphs, so I’m not going to duplicate it here; you can click here to read it for yourself.


Categories: Steadfast with the Confessions Tags:




Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. July 12th, 2013 at 10:55 | #1

    Love the book of Concord. Very instrumental in persuading me to Lutheran theology.

  2. Carl Vehse
    July 12th, 2013 at 11:11 | #2

    Two important extra features of the Book of Concord site are:

    1. The German and Latin texts of the Lutheran Symbols.

    2. Bente’s Historical Introductions to the Lutheran Confessions.

  3. Didaskalos
    July 13th, 2013 at 14:35 | #3

    Just received the book this week, and I’m enjoying my first few introductory chapters. A helpful feature: there’s a weekly reading plan to take the reader through the entire book in a year.

  4. July 13th, 2013 at 17:01 | #4

    @Didaskalos #3

    Yes, and this same “read through the BoC in a year” is available by email or twitter .. go to http://bocl.org/daily to sign up for it.

    Note also that http://bocl.org provides an easy way to link blog or online articles to the book of concord. For example, linking to eg. http://bocl.org?AC+XIII will link to article 13 of the Augsburg Confession.

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.