Harrison re-elected with 66% of the vote (by Pr. Charles Henrickson)

July 6th, 2013 Post by

It was announced this morning that LCMS President Matthew Harrison was re-elected, with 66% of the vote. Here are the results:

Candidate / Votes / Percentage

Matthew C. Harrison / 4,262 / 66.26%
David P. E. Maier / 1,906 / 29.63%
Herbert C. Mueller, Jr. / 264 / 4.10%

So, rounding off:

Harrison 66%
Maier 30%
Mueller: 4%

This is pretty much what I expected. Before the election I was predicting:

Harrison 65%
Maier 34%
Mueller 1%

So 66% for Harrison–and another 4% for Mueller–70% is a very strong showing for this team. That the candidate backed by Daystar (Matt Becker, David Domsch, Marie Meyer, DP David Benke, et al.) and by a few of the DPs who used their office to electioneer (Paul Linnemann, Robert Newton, Chris Wicher)–that their candidate, Maier, received just under 30% of the vote, this is a very poor showing.

The Harrison team now comes into the convention with a strong mandate. Let’s hope the elections and resolutions there go well also. In tht regard, I plan to post a series of columns this coming week with my analysis of the proposed resolutions coming from the seven floor committees.

One last note on the SP election. This was the first time using the new system for voting. Here was the level of participation:

Total Ballots = 6,432
Total Electorate = 8,201
Percentage Voted = 78.43%

It should be noted, though, that the “Total Electorate” could have been significantly higher. If all 6,000 congregations had sent two delegates to their 2012 district conventions, that would have made for closer to 12,000 potential electors.

Personally, I prefer our previous system of voting, i.e., the elected circuit delegates voting at the national convention itself. That’s where we vote for everything else. Why set up–and pay for–a whole separate system of voting? The reason this system was pushed by the Blue Ribbon folks in 2010 was so that the president-elect could basically pick the slate for 1VP. That’s the only reason the SP would need to be elected before the convention. Maybe the 2016 convention can vote to go back to the previous system.






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Didaskalos
    July 13th, 2013 at 15:22 | #1

    I’m personally thrilled with the election of Matthew Harrison, with whose articles in The Lutheran Witness (especially the January issue on the sanctity of life and a more recent issue on the subject of marriage) I’m impressed. Harrison’s testimony before the House committee was biblical and powerful. Charles you mention a “candidate backed by Daystar” who had a “very poor showing” in the election. I’m not familiar with who or what Daystar is. If it’s not asking for too lengthy an explanation, could you fill me in?

  2. July 13th, 2013 at 15:45 | #2

    @Didaskalos #1

    Daystar is a very small and very liberal political-action group within the LCMS.

  3. helen
    July 13th, 2013 at 15:49 | #3

    @Didaskalos #1
    I’m not familiar with who or what Daystar is. If it’s not asking for too lengthy an explanation, could you fill me in?

    Daystar = Women’s ordination now, plus as many other church offices as women want and should not be holding. IOW, bad news. (I thought you should hear it from a woman.)

  4. Jason
    July 13th, 2013 at 15:51 | #4

    @Didaskalos #1

    Sorry BJS for posting this….

    Take a look at their website:
    http://www.thedaystarjournal.com/

    In my biased opinion, be prepared before entering. And when you are done, Lysol your computer and bleach your eyeballs. The writers are rather liberal, and tend form the “missional” crowd.

Comment pages
1 2 31300
If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.