Great Stuff Found on the Web — The Lutheran Church Is and Is Not

November 18th, 2011 Post by

On Pastor Lovett’s blog, ORATIO + TENTATIO + MEDITATIO, he has a question regarding The Lutheran Church Is and Is Not.

 

Consider the following statement. I’d like to hear your comments below. (While I loathe to admit it, the statement was adapted from a very similar statement about the Eastern Orthodox Church here.)

The Lutheran Church is evangelical, but not Protestant. It is catholic, but not Roman. It is orthodox, but not Eastern. It isn’t non-denominational, neither is it merely a denomination – it is pre-denominational. It has believed, taught, preserved, defended and died for the witness of the Apostles since the Day of Pentecost some 2000 years ago.





Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Lloyd I. Cadle
    November 23rd, 2011 at 18:18 | #1

    @Martin R. Noland #46
    Thanks for the kind words Pastor Noland. We will be going back to our old LCMS church, starting tonight for the Thanksgiving service.

  2. mbw
    November 23rd, 2011 at 22:41 | #2

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #37

    > I just recently resigned as an elder and asked for a peaceful release from the WELS because a fellow gentleman on the council called me a heretic and said that I can no longer be “his elder” because I stated in a conversation with him that I believe in the six literal days of creation, but that there may be evidence that the universe may be 15 billion years old because it takes at least that long for the speed of light to reach us from the stars.

    What you are talking about isn’t evidence. God created light as such. At one “moment” there was no light, and the next, there was. He’s not trying to trick us — in every era there seem to be physical things that we can’t square with Scripture — but “science” is not all done, not static, always delusional in some important ways. Stick with the plain statements of Scripture and “science” will catch up (in some ways, while inventing other heresies as their orthodoxy). Superluminosity (travelling faster than light) has been in play in physics for a long time. Stay tuned. There’s no proof of any kind of such an old universe.

    I’m sad that this is a reason you are coming to the MO synod, because we really don’t need any more of this teaching. It’s officially frowned upon but delivered somewhat covertly even in some of our grade schools.

    > While reflecting on WELS doctrine, it is a little puzzling as to why women can’t vote

    The MO synod changed its practice (therefore its doctrine) on this in a devious and muddled way in convention in 1969. No theological reason has been given for the change. All of the Scriptural theology is on the traditional side of it. It is impossible to ignore the context of the 20th century, the winds of feminism (and pusillanimous abdication of responsibility by men in power), that blew us into this sorry situation.

    Again, a very poor reason to leave WELS.

    > and as to why you can’t pray with other Christians because of prayer fellowship within the WELS.

    Hardly anybody would disagree with you on this — but beware that actual unionism and even syncretism are to be found in the MO synod.

  3. Lloyd I. Cadle
    November 24th, 2011 at 10:26 | #3

    @mbw #52 The LCMS doesn’t take a position on the age of the universe. LCMS does state that they believe (again, as do I), that God created the universe in six literal days.

    How old the universe really is a secondary issue that the Bible does not address. It could be an old earth or a young earth. We must be careful on how we propose the arguments to un-believers. Again, I am simply stating that the universe appears to be old. It MAY NOT BE OLD!

    You state, “a very poor reason to leave WELS.” I was an elder there. I taught a Sunday school class. I helped do shut in visits with the pastors. I served communion to the pastors. I was on the evangelism and the strategic planning committes. I have five kids. My son did the sound for the church. We are confessional Lutherans, not borderline Lutherans.

    This other council member yelled at me in front of the other members of the church and humiliated me and my family. He said that I am no longer his brother and insisted that I leave the church or him. That is why we left. He is the treasurer of the council. The church had a hard time in finding a treasurer. My position as elder was not nearly as important as his position as a treasuer. So, when he said that either I leave or him, for the good of the church, I left. (By the way, other council members agreed with me on the age of the universe being a secondary issue.)

    I was very happy in the LCMS, but left my old church to help an Ablaze church plant, which frustrated me and we ended up in the WELS.

    We are happy to go back to our old LCMS church, and the pastor is glad to have us back.

    I am a confessional Lutheran. I go by the teachings in the Bible and the BOC. I read Luther almost every day. If you want to take a back handed slap at me and say that “we really don’t need any more of this teaching,” you sound as narrow minded as the council member that kicked a family of seven out in the street. (A family that is active and serving the Lord there.)

    I know that the LCMS is more than glad to take back a confessional Lutheran family!

    By the way, I post my name, why don’t you?

  4. #4 Kitty
    November 24th, 2011 at 11:13 | #4

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #53

    Welcome back to the LCMS Mr Cadle.
    However, I’m actually very glad that mbw spoke up. He demonstrates that, despite our doctrine, we are far from a perfect people. That is to say~ you’ll find the “other council member” here too.

  5. Jason
    November 24th, 2011 at 12:12 | #5

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #53

    Wow, sounds like you have a a church journey, but yet an appropriate one. So you left to start an Ablaze congregation. I am not surprised you became frustrated, particularly if they were trying watered down theology to attract the masses. Smart to leave. And then the WELS congregation… Good that you got out of there. Treasurer more important than elder? Well, considering how WELS takes an official view of ministry that is way too much functional, it is believable that this congregation can easily get it priorities all mixed up. Money more vital than truth or the Word of God? Probably for the best you got out of that situation. I say welcome back to the LC-MS. May you find a good home, and may you help us cling to the cross. Really, we should be thanking you for abilities that can help your members learn and commit to Jesus. Blessings on you future involvement.

  6. Lloyd I. Cadle
    November 24th, 2011 at 12:32 | #6

    @Jason #55 Thank you Jason for your understanding. The president of the church council was way, way overworked. If the treasurer were to quit, the president would also have to do the job of treasurer. The amount of work involved would affect his health.

    In this case, I am much more easy to replace than the treasurer.

  7. Carl H
    November 25th, 2011 at 09:54 | #7

    Don’t most Christian denominations believe that they are holding faithfully to apostolic teaching?

  8. mbw
    November 25th, 2011 at 12:07 | #8

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #53

    Lloyd, my name is known here. If you wish to contact me, you may do so via [my steadfast moniker][at][my steadfast moniker].org

    No swipe Lloyd. I do urge you to go back and reconcile if possible, or make charges, regarding what happened to you.

  9. Lloyd I. Cadle
    November 25th, 2011 at 13:26 | #9

    @mbw #58
    I have already asked for a peaceful release from the church. I am on good terms there.

    Just to fill you in on the situation at the church. The church has a dwindling membership. They hadn’t paid on their mortgage for two years. They started a school which backfired. Then they started an assisted living home which also went down. They only have about fifty members. They borrowed almost a half of a million dollars from the members and are having a hard time paying it back. Only the council members serve there. We have tried to get other members on the council, but, they just want to do there one hour a week for God and not get involved.

    Please understand this: They could not find anyone to be a treasurer of this messy church, with all of the financial problems that are going on. The only person that they could find to be treasurer is the hot headed council member that yelled at me to leave the church. The church is 55 years old and the old timers say that I am the best elder that they have ever had there. Please don’t take that as bragging, because I am a nothing.

    This hot headed councilman commanded that I leave or him – all because I stated that I believe in the six literal days of creation, but the universe may be 15 billion years old. Again, the universe may be a young earth, and the Book of Concord (our confessions) and the Bible does not take a position on this issue, so it is open for debate!

    Even though I was the elder there, if the hot headed councilman (the treasurer) left the church it would be a disaster. The job of treasurer would fall to an overworked president of the council, and he has already had health issues. I left on a peaceful release on good terms with all members and council members so the hot head wouldn’t quit and leave the church in even worse shape than it is.

    Also, I was becoming more concerned with the WELS concept of church and ministry (not being able to have prayer fellowship with my wife’s dad (a non Lutheran pastor), and women not being able to vote, etc.

    If you don’t have an understanding of this very difficult situation, you are not a very compassionate Luthern brother.

  10. Tom
    November 25th, 2011 at 13:35 | #10

    @Old Time St. John’s #1 I must disagree with the non-protestant claim. Luther lead the first of a very long and unfortunate line of protestant leaders. We would not have the large numbers of protestant denominations had Fr. Luther not lead the revolt. Luther had legitimate claims, such as the selling of indulgences. But these were local issues led by troubled bishops, and was never part of nor condoned by the Church. One of Luther’s issues was against the idea of monastic vows. If Luther had a problem with monastic vows, he should not have joined the Augustinians and perhaps he should have joined the Dominicans, where he would have been able to help the poor as he claimed the church should (and did) do. He condemned the entire idea of a prayerful order, showing a disbelief in the power of prayer. I was a Lutheran for 10 years and they are good and God fearing people that do a lot for the communities they are in. I just can’t let the first church to be lead away by a protestant claim to not be PROTEST(ant). The Orthodox are separated but theologically are almost indistinguishable from Catholic, so I don’t consider them protestant.

  11. mbw
    November 25th, 2011 at 13:47 | #11

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #59

    Lloyd I am sorry to have hurt you. I do not in any way judge you. I do not think the other churchman should have treated you that way. I do not think you understand about the issue of women in church government. I believe this issue has been badly mishandled in the MO synod, and has caused a tremendous amount of harm. It is one area where some conservatives in MO think WELS has it right. I am alarmed at the MO people who seem to desire the WELS view of church and ministry and flirt with it openly while claiming to be friends of Walther.

  12. Lloyd I. Cadle
    November 25th, 2011 at 13:59 | #12

    By the way…..I am a confessional Lutheran. I have studied and read every word in the BOC. I love Luther and Lutheran theology. I believe in the six literal days of creation. God created the universe out of nothing. God is the first cause.

    Since the Bible does not make a case for the age of the universe and neither do our confessions, we should say, “I believe that the universe is young and here are my arguments for it” or I believe that the universe is old, and here is why……”

    Both young earth and old earth folks bring in a bunch of presuppositions and use Bible passages out of context to make their case. AGAIN, THE BIBLE DOES NOT SAY THE UNIVERSE IS 6,000 YEARS OLD OR 15 BILLION YEARS OLD. We need to make our case and state that we really don’t know, and leave the Bible out of it.

  13. Tom
    November 25th, 2011 at 14:02 | #13

    @Tom #60 Lutherans can’t be predemonination if they have schisms (synods) of itself that are not in full communion with all other parts. Some of these such as the anglo-lutherans are much closer to Catholic theologically than others. In fact the Anglo-Lutherans (a breakaway of the Missouri Synod), has joint the Anglican Ordinariate of the Catholic Church and are in full communion. Of course this meant that they have moved on issues where the two churches are close (justification – a bit of a what came first the chicken or the egg argument. On others they had to move a little more – consubstantiation.

  14. mbw
    November 25th, 2011 at 14:03 | #14

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #59

    Lloyd – also – part of Walther’s pro-congregation solution was a very powerful (“supreme”) voter’s assembly. (Here I anticipate the mockery of the hierarchicalists.) This cannot coexist with female and child voters. Either a blatantly non-Scriptural polity is practiced with women truly in authority over men, or the voters are deprecated in favor of the church council and the pastor, so that the voters in fact have no authority. In the context of the church body essentially founded by Walther, this is experimental at best. It’s also very inconsistent, even hypocritical, when the church constitution still reads as it did say 50 years ago, except hacked to allow woman voters.

    So, if you are truly fleeing the WELS view of church and ministry, please research what the MO voter assembly was supposed to be. Note that it is very easy to caricature the old standard-form MO constitution, when voters are referred to as “supreme.” It does not mean that the church was envisioned as a democracy.

  15. Lloyd I. Cadle
    November 25th, 2011 at 14:05 | #15

    @mbw #60 mbw, no problem. We have much in common because we are confessional. Now that I am back home in the LCMS, maybe one day we’ll take the Lord’s Supper together!

  16. Lloyd I. Cadle
    November 25th, 2011 at 15:19 | #16

    @mbw #62 For me, the real difficult issue is the prayer fellowship. Around the Thanksgiving table we have a lot of Christians in both families. However, my wife and I are the only Lutherans. So, when we were WELS, we were not allowed to pray with other family members because they believed false doctrine and were not in fellowship with the WELS even though they were Christians. My wife had a real hard time with this because her father is a pastor, but not a WELS pastor.

    I am not talking about a situation like the Yankee Stadium incident, where you are praying with Muslims etc. That is wrong. And, I am not talking about communion where we should not take the Supper with non-Lutherans. I am talking about good Christians that are family members and not being allowed to pray with them.

  17. Carl Vehse
    November 25th, 2011 at 15:31 | #17

    “… the Yankee Stadium incident, where you are praying with Muslims etc.”

    At Yankee Stadium, it was more blasphemous than just a heretical prayer with Muslims, it was a LCMS pastor, sneaking onto the field without FBI-clearance, despite being told by the group leader to remain on the bench, and co-officiating a prayer service with Muslims, Jews, and other non-Christian clerics. Then the heretical pastor unrepentantly attacked those confessional Lutherans who called him to account.

  18. mbw
    November 25th, 2011 at 16:43 | #18

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #66

    Lloyd, I do rejoice in our unity on these issues. And I confess that I regularly commune with people with whom I am not in total doctrinal agreement, because the role of women in the church is a doctrinal issue, and in almost every MO congregation there is disagreement or flat out error on this. I am sorry. Should I stop communing? I believe that they do not understand (because they have been taught this muddled fence-straddling by their teachers), and would not willfully oppose St. Paul and the entire order of creation if they did. I can’t commune at a WELS/CLC church.

  19. Old Time St. John’s
    November 26th, 2011 at 11:52 | #19

    @Tom #60
    I didn’t make the ‘non-Protestant’ claim; that was in the original post.

    I find it a bit confusing to use the term Protestant, and I avoid it because in many circles it has come to mean “non-denominational, mega-church, fundamentalist, anti-Sacramental, politically conservative, Reformed, and Biblicist.” But I don’t make an issue of the term unless it is used that way.

    There is a good book from Northwestern Publishing House called “Lutheran, Catholic, Protestant” that makes the case that Lutheranism is separate from Protestantism quite well. I recommend it.

  20. mbw
    November 26th, 2011 at 12:14 | #20

    @Old Time St. John’s #69

    > “Lutheran, Catholic, Protestant”

    Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant by Greg Jackson. He did some good work, but now he is in a perpetual rant against “Objective Justification” which he lumps in with universalism, and he’s trying to run an Internet church. Objective Justification is taught by our church against Calvinism and Arminianism, and is not universalism.

  21. November 26th, 2011 at 12:54 | #21

    Tom (63): “In fact the Anglo-Lutherans (a breakaway of the Missouri Synod), has joint the Anglican Ordinariate of the Catholic Church and are in full communion. Of course this meant that they have moved on issues where the two churches are close (justification – a bit of a what came first the chicken or the egg argument. On others they had to move a little more – consubstantiation.”

    Since Rome later boasted that they gave up nothing in that “agreement” on “justification” they signed with the ELCA, the Anglo-Lutherans must have moved on justification all the way back to purgatory and purchasing forgiveness with cash money.

  22. mbw
    November 26th, 2011 at 19:18 | #22

    @#4 Kitty #54

    > you’ll find the “other council member” here too.

    thank you very much!

Comment pages
1 2 2961
If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.