Keep the Merry…and the Myth

December 19th, 2012 Post by

atheist christmas billboard

“Keep the Merry…Dump the Myth.” According to a recent Fox News article, that’s the message the New Jersey chapter of American Atheists being shared with visitors in Times Square this Christmas, er sorry, winter solstice celebration season.

In recent years, various forms of atheist “evangelism” have become like Aunt Mable’s fruitcake: a regular scheduled holiday staple (my apologies to all fruit cake lovers and Aunt Mables out there). Not only that, the frequency of these messages have increased both in the size and scope with particular antagonism toward Christianity.

According to Silverman, a private donor gave over 25k for the sign to remain in Times Square until January 10, 2013. Now, I’m not going to so say the charitable atheist doesn’t exist. But I can’t help but wonder how that 25k could have been better spent elsewhere, say a homeless shelter in New York City or the struggling victims of Hurricane Sandy, a sleigh-full of toys for tots or one Big Apple size bell-ringing bucket full of change. To be sure, this isn’t the main thrust of the Christian apologetic – nor should it be. However, there is something to be said for an apologetic of mercy. [endnote 1] It is worth noting that this further illustrates the deep chasm between the Christian and the atheistic, naturalistic worldviews. What would most Christian churches you know do if they were given a gift of roughly 25k this time of the year? Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. Or, as C.S. Lewis once said, “If you read history you’ll find that the Christians who did the most for the present world were just those who thought most of the next.” (C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, p. 134).

All that aside, here is the primary point: Christians should expect these kinds of messages in the public square to increase. We know they’re coming.

Here’s my take on this.

Avoid blazing the culture warrior warpath over whether or not we should say, “Merry Christmas” or “Happy Holidays.” That will only leave you spinning your tires in the verbal snow.

Similarly, avoid the First Amendment issues of free speech and establishment clauses. Yes, it’s important to know the language and history of the Constitution, but this discussion will lead you down the wrong reindeer trail, away from Christ and closer to Caesar. That’s great if you’re in a political discussion. But if you’re trying to proclaim the Gospel, this will shoot your eye out.

Also, leave the debate about whether or not the United States is a Christian nation or not for another day. You only have so much time in a conversation with a skeptic. And so what if you can prove that the U.S. is based on a Judeo-Christian value system; that’s nowhere near the Gospel or saving faith in Christ and it doesn’t help one bit in demonstrating the truthfulness of the Christian claim that Christ’s death and resurrection is an historical event.

And finally, avoid beginning with emotional arguments such as, “I’m offended, therefore it should be taken down,” or appealing to nostalgic feelings of festive and holiday cheer. Offense, nostalgia and emotion have no bearing whatsoever when it comes to the truthfulness or falsehood of an assertion. For example, I thoroughly enjoy watching Charlie Brown’s Christmas but can’t stand Frosty the Snow Man, and yet, in either case, I have not demonstrated the truthfulness about either character’s existence.

Rather, Christians should deal with this billboard’s assertions head on: is it true that Christianity is just another myth to be dumped along the curbside with Santa’s sleigh and all the decorations on December 26th? And, when compared to the Christian worldview, does the atheistic, naturalistic explanation of the universe offer a better and more truthful explanation for the major questions in life (Where did I come from? What happens when we die? etc.). Of course, it is entirely possible that both the atheist and Christian worldviews are wrong, however, they cannot both be right. Questions of this nature simply cannot be answered on a billboard.

Atheists are quick to throw Jesus onto the island of misfit myths along with the likes of Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, leprechauns, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, the Easter Bunny, and the like. You can understand why; it’s far easier to paint Jesus – and the Christian faith – as a foolish caricature and throw out a 25k “gotcha” message than it is to come meet the Christian claim on an intellectual, factual, evidential basis. Billboards like the one in New York have no interest in an open, honest debate. They are meant to poke fun and make assertions without examining any evidence for the Christian claim.

But Jesus is entirely different than any of the aforementioned mythical characters. That’s like comparing the nightly news to my daughter’s favorite cartoon world of Bubble Guppies. Because, unlike any other world religion, the core message of Christianity is objective and uniquely historical: a specific guy lived at a specific time in history, and did specific things that were heard, seen and recorded by eyewitness. What’s more, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence, both from Christian and secular sources, by which we can investigate this claim. Jesus is qualitatively, empirically, and historically different than the atheists’ definition of myth.

If Christianity really is a myth – that is, a fictitious lie –  Christians would agree with the billboard (1 Corinthians 15). However, contrary to atheist dogma, Jesus is not a myth. He was a real historical figure who claimed to die on the cross and vindicated his claim by rising on the third day. Therefore, Christians can and should make a well-reasoned case for the truthfulness of the Christian claim that Christ was born, lived, died and rose.

You see, Christmas and apologetics go hand in hand. These events didn’t occur “once upon a time” or in a galaxy far, far away” but out in the open for all – skeptic and believer – to see and hear. It happened in the days when Quirinius was governor of Syria and Caesar Augustus decreed a census. To be sure, Luke (like the other gospel writers) presents the facts in historical narrative form. But the characters are nonetheless real historical figures: Caesar, Quirinius, Pilate, Herod, Caiaphas, John, Jesus, Mary, Peter, James, Paul, etc. These are real historical figures and real historical events. The facts of history simply do not fit the assertion made by this recent billboard.

The Christmas story reads more like an historical document at times than a proclamation of cosmic rescue from sin and death. In reality, it’s both a declaration and a defense. Proclamation was always accompanied by evidence for the veracity of the events themselves. Just read Acts, also written by Luke the historian and apologist. But don’t stop there. Examine the reliable eyewitness testimony. Look at the veracious historical records – both of Christian historians and secular. Study the numerous archaeological findings. Paul Maier spends almost ninety pages in his book, In the Fullness of Time going over the historical, archaeological, geographical and scriptural evidence for the empirical reliability of the events surrounding the Christmas story. [endnote 2] And Lee Strobel has also written a brief, but helpful book titled, The Case for Christmas.

 Also, consider using the following pieces of information when shaping your opening statement in the courtroom of skepticism:
First, begin with a few basic principles historians utilize in establishing the credibility of historical claims: [endnote 3]

1. Multiple, independent sources support historical claims.
2. Attestation by an enemy supports historical claims.
3. Embarrassing admissions support historical claims.
4. Eyewitness testimony supports historical claims.
5. Early testimony supports historical claims.

In every case, the Christian claim passes the historical test easily.

Second, continue the apologetic discussion by using a “bare minimum facts” approach, which builds a case using those facts that demonstrate a high degree of certainty among both Christian and skeptical scholars.

1. Jesus died by crucifixion.
2. Jesus’ disciples believed that he rose and appeared to them.
3. The church persecutor Paul was suddenly changed.
4. The skeptic James, brother of Jesus, was suddenly changed.
5. The tomb was empty.

The war on Christmas isn’t going to stop anytime soon. So, we need a little apologetics, right this very minute! Read the atheists’ books and tackle their arguments with critical thinking, answer their objections in truth and love, challenge your atheist friends or neighbors to be open-minded enough to look at the evidence, and continue steadfast in defense and confession of the orthodox Christian faith.

Christianity doesn’t ask us to check our brain at the door; rather, it is a faith founded on fact.  This message – Jesus died for your sins and rose again – is true. It is the greatest story ever told because it is also true.

And it shouldn’t be lost on us that this is also a story. Myths are stories that explain the world around us; but myth need not be a word defined purely by fiction or falsehood. A story that is true does not cease to be a myth and a myth certainly can be a true story, such as we find in the historic Christian faith.

The heart of Christianity is a myth which is also a fact. The old myth of the Dying God, without ceasing to be myth, comes down from heaven of legend and imagination to the earth of history. It happens – at a particular date, in a particular place, followed by definable historical consequences. We pass from a Balder or an Osiris, dying nobody knows when or where, to a historical Person crucified (it is all in order) under Pontius Pilate. By becoming fact it does not cease to be a myth: that is the miracle…For this is the marriage of heaven and earth: Perfect Myth and Perfect Fact: claiming not only our love and our obedience, but also our wonder and delight, addressed to the savage, the child, the poet in each one of us no less than to the moralist, the scholar and the philosopher.

christmas icon

Lewis’s words remind us that the Christian Gospel – that God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself – answers both the intellectual and existential questions of man. All of our questions about life and death, about God’s existence and his care for creation and our life after death are finally answered in the most unlikely places: Bethlehem and Jerusalem. God became man for you. God was in the manger for you. God was on the cross for you. So, this Christmas you can keep the merry and the myth, for the myth has become fact for you.

O Jesus Christ, Thy manger is

My paradise at which my soul reclineth.

For there, O Lord, Doth lie the Word

Made flesh for us; herein Thy grace forth shineth.

LSB 372:1


Endnotes —

[1] Here I have in mind books like Alvin Schmidt’s How Christianity Changed the World and Arthur C. Brooks’ Who Really Cares: America’s Charity Divine, Who Gives, Who Doesn’t and Why It Matters.

[2] Paul Maier, In the Fullness of Time: A Historian Looks at Christmas, Easter, And the Early Church. Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1991.

[3] The following lists come from a book by Michael Licona and Gary Habermas, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 2004.


Categories: Steadfast in Defense Tags:




Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. December 19th, 2012 at 14:51 | #1

    Ironic that they want to keep Santa Claus, i.e., St. Nicholas, whose fame would not exist without Jesus Christ.

    Me thinks they haven’t thought this through…

  2. William
    December 19th, 2012 at 15:57 | #2

    Ah do I hear much of John Warwick Montgomery in the piece? What the atheist hasn’t the slightest clue atall.

  3. Jim Hamilton
    December 19th, 2012 at 19:32 | #3

    “Evangelical ” atheism makes no sense at all. If there is no God, why bother trying to convince others of that fact. Nothing matters, we’re just randomly assembled bits of organic sludge, why make the effort to do anything? Clearly, these folks believe in God, they just hate and fear him. Sad. May the Holy Spirit convert all those lost in darkness.

  4. Dutch
    December 19th, 2012 at 20:05 | #4

    Um, I don’t generally say, Merry Christmas. I say Happy Christmas. “Merry”, less than a century ago, meant ya over did the night before.

    “I was making rather merry, last night.”
    At the end of the day, this is to those in high places, pick a Denom or Synod, your choice.
    I’d rather speak & engage an atheist, than a “wood warmer” Lutheran/Christian. Refuting is easy, if you know nothing or believe it not. It’s the ones, who punch a “time card” that are all but impossible to engage, in many a way. They knew, were taught, but believe & trust Him not.

    Atheists are easy, it’s the ones who warm the wood weekly in a pew, that are difficult.

  5. December 19th, 2012 at 20:49 | #5

    @Jim Hamilton #3
    In my experience as a chaplain with people from all walks of life, I never met an “atheist” who wasn’t mad at God.

  6. Dutch
    December 20th, 2012 at 08:14 | #6

    Pastor Crandall,
    Spot on!!!! You cannot hate, what you do not believe or know. Nor can one be afraid of such, as well.
    I always come back to what I was trained & taught, both at home & at Church, from little on:
    words are cheap, actions speak volumes. Empathy, in a Scriptural sense, affords & allows insight, to what you posted in #5. We are all called & lovingly asked to do so. Far to many don’t, for reasons abound.
    You cannot hate, what you do not know.
    Great Post Pastor!

  7. Mrs. Hume
    December 20th, 2012 at 08:57 | #7

    Hey, I challenge the atheists to put up the same sign but with a menorah.

    Then they can put up the same sign but with a picture of the mosque of the Dome of the Rock right before Eid.

    How much you wanna bet the atheists won’t be doing that?

  8. Mrs. Hume
    December 20th, 2012 at 09:42 | #8

    Just looking at the sign again. It looks a bit mislabeled when you think about it. Santa Claus is the myth. Whereas every reputable and honest historian from the Roman Tacitus forward has acknowledged that Jesus existed as a historical person who was crucified in Jerusalem.

    So the sign should more accurately read, “Keep the Myth, Dump the Truth”

    Which is pretty much what atheism is all about.

    Anyway with a menorah, they could say, “Dump the Law” and a picture of the Ten Commandments that they so hate.

  9. Jim Pierce
    December 20th, 2012 at 17:35 | #9

    @Jim Hamilton #3

    Mr. Hamilton,

    I was an “evangelical” atheist for 18 years before God decided it was time to pluck me off the trash heap (borrowing from Giertz’s “The Hammer of God”) and give me faith to receive Him. Obviously I can’t speak for all evangelical atheists, but some of the reasons why I—and many I associated with—was dead set on deconverting theists is that I believed they needed to be set free from lies which chained their minds in irrationalism, or “darkness.” Liberating theists from their brainwashing was much like carrying out the Emancipation Proclamation.

    However, the motivations behind my work at deconverting theists included my own need to disprove the existence of God to my own satisfaction. If I could get one person to walk away from God, then I felt my beliefs were validated. Such was my deep hatred for God and my own deception. I was constantly (and I do mean constantly) trying to eradicate any notion of God out of my mind, but I never succeeded. The law of God, written on my heart, was a constant reminder that the lawgiver really existed and I was in trouble with Him.

    My experience as an evangelical atheist, and having participated with others such as those in the Freedom From Religion Foundation, is that many of these atheists sincerely believe that theists have been deceived by religions and that they need to be set free from their “God delusion,” as Richard Dawkins has put it.

  10. Elizabeth
    December 27th, 2012 at 20:30 | #10

    Where is the scholarly, peer-reviewed evidence of “Multiple, independent sources support historical claims.”
    I sincerely would like to know.

  11. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    December 29th, 2012 at 22:15 | #11

    Elizabeth, you ask an honest and good question. I’ll write a more complete response to you with further detail soon. It’s on my list of things to do anyhow. But here are a few links that should get you started:

    http://e-nklings-revschuldheisz.blogspot.com/2010/11/declare-and-defend-extended-historical.html

    http://e-nklings-revschuldheisz.blogspot.com/2010/11/declare-and-defend-quick-reference_03.html

    http://e-nklings-revschuldheisz.blogspot.com/2010/11/declare-and-defend-quick-reference.html

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.