Biblical Apologetics, Part 2

July 25th, 2012 Post by

I was by now too experienced in my literary criticism to regard the Gospels as myths.  They had not the mythical taste…if ever a myth had become fact, had been incarnated, it would be just like this.  And nothing else in all literature was just like this.  Myths were like it in one way.  Histories were like it in another.  But nothing was simply like it.  And no person was like the Person it depicted; as real, as recognizable, through all that depth of time…yet so numinous, a light from beyond the world, a god.  But if a god – we are not polytheists – then not a god, but God…myth became fact; the Word became flesh, God, man.

– C.S. Lewis, Surprised by Joy

In part two (click here for Part I) of Biblical Apologetics, we continue to examine the manifold ways the Scriptures themselves breathe out Christ’s very life and Words into the apologetic task. That is to say, the defense of the Christian faith is woven into the same fabric of the Scriptures that form the foundation for all doctrine and practice – our only source and norm – including apologetics. Christian apologetics is normed and guided by Scripture. And we do well to approach the Scriptures with apologetics in mind.  For apologetics and the proclamation of the Gospel are a blessed confluence, flowing right into the Church’s mission and ministry and directly out of our lips to ears who will hear (Romans 10:17).

Previously, we cited examples of biblical apologetics from both Jesus and St. Paul. And though this is by no means an exhaustive list, here are some more passages in the long list of evidence that we might use in our confession of the reason for our hope in Christ’s resurrection (1 Peter 3:15).

  1. As previously stated, Jesus frequently used objective evidence in supporting his miracles and teaching. Recall the paralytic man in Mark 2. “That you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sin,” he said to the paralytic, “I say to you arise, take up your bed and go home.”
  2. He also made similar claims in reference to his own body and to his own death and resurrection in John 2:18ff: “Destroy this temple and I will raise it again in three days…”  He also answers Thomas skepticism with by submitting the ultimate evidence into review: “Thomas, Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing” (John 20).
  3. In Matthew 12:24-30 Jesus made frequent use of well-known methods of reasoning (argumentation) which also fill the apologist’s tool box: 1) arguments from analogy, 2) reduction ad absurdum, 3) the law of contradiction, just to name a few.
  4. It’s no wonder then, that the disciples and apostles – including St. Paul – learned the defense of the faith from their master and used it frequently as the Gospel continued to go forth to the nations from Jerusalem. The book of Acts and the Epistles of Paul are stuffed with examples. The constant confession of the apostles was this: Christ Jesus was crucified, dead, buried and risen from the dead and of this we are eyewitnesses (Acts 2:32). Peter proclaims this at the beginning of the book of Acts, in his Pentecost sermon no less. The central event of the entire Christian faith – Christ’s death and resurrection – was always proclaimed by the apostles as grounded in the objective facts of history and is now accompanied by a long list of evidence that is better attested than any other event in ancient history. This is good for us today too in our proclamation. The same Gospel we proclaim is founded on fact, not feeling. The old hymn (if it can really be called that) – “you ask me how I know he lives, he lives in my heart” – is wrong. The defense of the Christian message does not rely on my heart, my feelings but on the sure and certain historical facts whether or not my heart believes it to be true.
  5. In Acts 4:33, the apostles continue to give witness to the resurrection of Jesus in their preaching and teaching.
  6. Even when under public scrutiny, in trial, amidst the threat of punishment and imprisonment (Acts 5:32ff), the apostles continue to make their eyewitness claim to the Gospel known before all. This is yet another mark of authenticity in the eyewitness accounts. Many men have gone to their death believing a lie, having been hoodwinked (Heaven’s Gate and any number of cults could be cited). However it much less likely that men will go to their death’s willingly for something they know to be false and yet claim as truth. This however, simply does not add up to the facts as they are recorded in the Gospel accounts. At point A on Good Friday the disciples saw Jesus dead. At point B on Easter Sunday (and thereafter) they saw Jesus alive. Jesus’ death and resurrection is the event that best fits the evidence. Not to mention the grand conspiracy that would have to take place, defeating all odds, if the disciples were all in on the lie together and had to maintain the same story repeatedly. The amount of work it would take would be overwhelming. In fact, the truth is far simpler. Jesus died. Jesus rose. They saw it and now they tell people what they saw.
  7. In closing, I offer two more examples with a few key words highlighted for emphasis. Notice the evidential nature of these passages. 2 Peter 1:16-18 For we did not follow cunningly devised fables when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty. For He received from God the Father honor and glory when such a voice came to Him from the Excellent Glory: “This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” And we heard this voice which came from heaven when we were with Him on the holy mountain.
  8. And  1 John 1:1-4 – That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life—the life was manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and declare to you that eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us—that which we have seen and heard we declare to you, that you also may have fellowship with us; and truly our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ. And these things we write to you that your joy may be full.

It would appear that one more segment of this column, Biblical Apologetics, is in order. In the third and final installment, we’ll take a closer look at one of the famous apologetic exchanges in the book of Acts, namely, St. Paul in Athens as he makes the unknown god known through evidential apologetics.






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Rev. Paul T. McCain
    July 25th, 2012 at 19:28 | #1

    Thanks for another good post.

  2. Lora Gorton
    July 25th, 2012 at 22:20 | #2

    Pastor Schuldheisz,
    I’ve been listening to Dr. Montgomery lectures on Issues Etc. I’ve heard him for years but now that I’m becoming more aware of what the New Atheists are saying I find his lectures much more understandable. I’ve heard him make a statement similar to “Christianity Needs More Lutheran Apologetes”. I’ve been listening and reading allot of other Apologetes and to be honest I’m not understanding much of what they say. That’s because I’ve not studied Philosophy, Biology or Cosmology much. I’ve been looking at Dr. William Lane Craig’s site and much of his books I’m totally lost in. He has a book for children called, “The Defense Never Rests” Designed for “budding apologists” of all ages, the workbook covers religious epistemology, the Leibnizian and Kalam cosmological arguments, the design argument, the moral argument, and the ontological argument for God, the Trinity, divine providence, the incarnation, the atonement, and, finally, the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection.

    I’m wondering does Dr. Mongomery and other Lutheran Apologetes uses all those topics in their defense of the Gospel?

  3. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    July 26th, 2012 at 10:36 | #3

    you are welcome

  4. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    July 26th, 2012 at 10:44 | #4

    Lora,
    Thank you for reading and taking the time to post comments and questions. Apologetics, like any field of study, has a spectrum of arguments from the everyman on the street style to the high academic style. Almost all of them utilize philosophical reasoning to one degree or another. One of the differences you will often find is that, depending on the person talking / writing, etc., their capability to bring the higher intellectual arguments into a format which anyone can understand is a bit harder to find. William Lane Craig, for example is a skilled apologist, but I am not always certain he writes for the popular level the way someone like a Josh McDowell does.

    Now, part of my point here is that both are necessary: the “reader’s digest” and the academic elite (for lack of better comparison).

    And I would be remiss if I didn’t mention capable apologists who have both a profound intellect and a true gift for making that known to the rest of us. For example, Craig Parton in books like “The Defense Never Rests: A Lawyers Quest for the Gospel” (Concordia Publishing House) and his book “Religion on Trial (Wipf and Stock). Or John W. Montgomery’s “History, Law and Christianity”. These are a few good books that bring apologetics into our forefront and take the time to explain some of the philosophical uses of reason, etc. I also recommend picking up a simple intro to logic / philosophy book and becoming familiar with basic arguments, etc.

  5. #4 Kitty
    July 26th, 2012 at 12:29 | #5

    William Lane Craig, for example is a skilled apologist,

    He’s amazing. In my opinion he holds his own among all he debates and outright wins against most of the “gnu atheists” like Hitchens and Sam Harris. I do think he loses against Shelly Kagen though.

  6. Rev. Paul T. McCain
    July 27th, 2012 at 15:26 | #6

    I do with #4 Kitty would find within himself the courage to use his real name. Maybe some day?

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.