Biblical Apologetics, Part 1

June 19th, 2012 Post by

Logical, philosophically reasonable arguments can – and indeed, must – be used in the defense of the Christian faith. But are Christians able to claim Biblical precedent for apologetics? Is it right for Christians to understand that Holy Writ teaches and uses(widely) apologetics as opposed to something merely read into the text? And does a Lutheran apologetic entail more (but certainly not less) than arguments and intellectual understanding? Yes, unequivocally.  Biblical examples of apologetics are numerous, not to mention prescriptive and descriptive. The list below is a first step towards an annotated collection of Biblical apologetics’ passages.

This is why, when it comes to developing and inculcating ourselves in a Biblical apologetic approach, two things are vital:

  1. A lucid, robust, steadfast, Christ-centered Biblical confession of the Christian faith and,
  2. An objectively Christ-centered, winsome, well-reasoned, bold defense of the faith once and for all delivered to the saints (Jude 3).

Anything less than would mean certain ecclesial and evangelistic suicide. Both are necessary.

“In a secular world where numerous religious options are vying for attention, it is never sufficient just to proclaim the message of the gospel. That message must be offered together with the reasons why it is true, as contrasted with the many false solutions to the human dilemma that are inconsistent with it. This is exactly what the apostles did–think of Paul on the Areopagus” (John W. Montgomery).

The Church must sacrifice neither gospel proclamation nor its defense; a failure to do either one results in the loss of both. To paraphrase LC-MS president Al Barry, “Get the message straight and get the message out, Missouri; and defend that message when necessary.” For we see that in the New Testament, gospel proclamation is never alone. It is always accompanied with evidence: healing, miracles, the tangible and physical, etc. This should come as no surprise to hearers of the Word. After all, as Lewis reminds us, “God likes matter; He created it” (C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity).

This is why, among the myriad of tools we can use to defend the Christian faith the best singular approach which captures the Christo-centric thrust of Lutheran proclamation is evidential apologetics.

  1. St. Paul used evidential methods in 1 Corinthians 15:3-6 when delivering to the Corinthians what he received from others, namely, the proclamation of the historical facts of Jesus’ death and resurrection. Paul makes a particular point to mention specific people by name who had seen the risen Lord: James, Cephas, the apostles and five hundred others, most of whom were still living. In other words, Paul is telling people: “Don’t want to take my word for it, fine; go talk to these guys. They saw him dead on Friday and alive on Sunday or soon after.”
  2. Jesus also used this method repeatedly. In Matthew 11:4-5, Jesus responded to the messengers of John the Baptizer who had inquired about whether or not He was the Messiah by saying, “Go and tell John the things which you hear and see: The blind see and the lame walk; the lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear; the dead are raised up and the poor have the gospel preached to them” (emphasis added).

     “In short, Jesus pointed to the empirical evidence of His miraculous work from which John could conclude He was indeed the Messiah. Jesus did not tell John’s disciples simply to have “faith” that He was the Promised One, apart from pointing them to empirical evidence.” [endnote 1]

  3. Mark 2:1-12 and the healing of the paralytic is also empirical. “Which is easier, to say to the paralytic, ‘Your sins are forgiven you,’ or to say, ‘Arise, take up your bed and walk’? But that you may know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins”—He said to the paralytic, 11 “I say to you, arise, take up your bed, and go to your house.”

    The man went away healed in body and soul. And it is precisely through an empirical, evidential method – healing the man – that Jesus demonstrates his claim to have the authority to forgive sin. Once again, gospel miracles accompany gospel proclamation. (i.e. evidence). For our subjective faith must always be grounded in the objective reality of the gospel. This is why evidence matters.

  4. Now of course, a miracle – or any other piece of evidence for that matter – does not automatically mean the person witnessing the miracle will come to faith. Lutheran apologetics does not claim to create faith ex opera operato for faith is created by the Holy Spirit where and when He pleases (AC V). And no one can say that Jesus Christ is Lord, unless it is by the Holy Spirit. In fact, many who saw the miracles of Jesus rejected him all the more because his teaching and miracles.

    Jesus says as much in Luke 16:29-31:“They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.’ And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.”

    Apologetics has both benefits and limitations. Evidence can only go so far. Proclamation is the primary task, but when called for, a defense is necessary nonetheless. “Using the categories of the period of Lutheran orthodox, saving faith involves (1) notitia, (2) assensus and (3) fiducia. Any apologist worth his salt knows that the highest level his work can reach is (2) assensus– no more. Fiducia is beyond his reach, is God’s business” (Rod Rosenbladt).

    And yet our Lord and his apostles always proclaim the gospel and provide an objective, factual basis for their claims. Done faithfully, apologetics is evangelism; both proclamation and defense go hand in hand. What we believe is always allied with why we believe it. The subjective gift of faith is grounded in the objective historical, theological reality of the person and work of Jesus on our behalf.

  5. 1 Peter 3:15 we are commanded to “always be ready to give a reasoned defense to anyone who asks you for a reason of the hope that is within you.” That little Greek word translated , defense, is the where we get the word apologia – and apologetics from.
  6. This word apologia also shows up in Philippians 1:17 as well as St. Paul tells the Christians in Philippi that he has been “appointed for the defense (apologia) of the gospel.

Stay tuned for more in Biblical Apologetics, Part 2 as Steadfast in Defense continues to add to the growing list of Scriptural examples as we pray, “O Lord, open my lips and my mouth will declare your praise.” And by all means, feel free to submit further examples.

 


 

Endnotes –

[1] Alvin Schmidt, Christianity Needs More Lutheran Apologetes, p.500. Tough Minded Christianity: Honoring the Legacy of John Warwick Montgomery, ed. William Dembski and Thomas Schirrmacher, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, TN, 2008.






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. Neely Owen
    June 19th, 2012 at 11:07 | #1

    Well written! Thanks for this — very much appreciated!

  2. Jim Pierce
    June 19th, 2012 at 11:48 | #2

    Pr. Schuldheisz,

    Thank you very much for this great essay on apologetics. I do have a question following from your statement, “For our subjective faith must always be grounded in the objective reality of the gospel. This is why evidence matters.” Typically, when we talk about something being “subjective” to the person, we are saying that whatever it is that is subjective proceeds from the person’s mind. We often hear this said by others such as, “Oh, that is something in your mind,” or “That exists only in your mind.”

    Since faith is given to us by God through His Word (it is not a work of our own mind, but the work of the Holy Spirit), can you flesh out a bit more what you mean by the term “subjective faith?”

    Thank you.

  3. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    June 19th, 2012 at 16:08 | #3

    Neely, thank you for reading and for your kinds words.

    Jude 3

  4. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    June 19th, 2012 at 16:32 | #4

    Jim, thanks for reading and for the comments. Splendid question. It was one of those things that I could have taken more time to explain but I knew that it was a rabbit trail I didn’t want to hop down at the moment, in order to stay on task. But this is the perfect place to take a stroll. When I use the term “subjective / objective” in this piece, and in most cases, what I have in the background is something akin to the Pieper / Latin exposition of faith. In other words, the Lutheran reformers and their successors typically spoke of subjective faith in this way: fides qua creditur, i.e. faith by which Christ is believed; or personal faith. On the other hand this personal faith and trust is always grounded in the objective, what in Latin is called the fides quae creditur, i.e. the faith, the doctrine which is believed; the teaching concerning Christ.

    Your example given is precisely the reason this is important – and why evidence is important. If something is “only in my head” or personal, or whatever subjective adjective you want to use, how do you know if it is real or not? Hence, the objective reality, evidence and history of the event, in this case, the death and resurrection of Jesus (not to mention his entire person and work as recorded in the NT).

    It’s like that old hymn (and what a womper it was) “I know that Jesus lives because he lives within my heart.” Very well, but it does no good for Jesus to live in your heart if he does not first live in history, time and space as well.

    Or I often explain it this way, our emotions do not make our faith, but faith in many cases gives fruit to emotions.

    Hopefully that helps elucidate the distinction made there. Thanks again for your comments.

  5. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    June 19th, 2012 at 16:35 | #5

    Oh, and one more thing I just thought of…your ending example of faith given through God’s appointed means (word and sacrament) is further example of the point I was trying to make: the objective reality – God’s Word, the gift of faith, etc. – is given to us in which we stand and cling to, believe, or as Luther says, fear, love and trust above all things. The “I believe” of the catechism is never separated from the “this is most certainly true.” Or to say it another way, God’s Word and Sacraments are certainly true in and of themselves, but we pray that through his appointed means, they would become a blessing among us and for us personally as well.

  6. Jim Pierce
    June 19th, 2012 at 16:45 | #6

    @Pastor Sam Schuldheisz #4

    That is a great response. I guessed as much, but I thought that if I had the question, then another might also and so asked. Thank you for the clarification.

  7. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    June 19th, 2012 at 16:50 | #7

    Jim, thank you. And thanks again for the question. One must never assume the answer. As one of my profs at sem often said, the Gospel assumed is the Gospel denied.

  8. Joe
    June 20th, 2012 at 12:55 | #8

    Great post and discussion!

  9. ralph luedtke
    June 21st, 2012 at 07:03 | #9

    problems with truth teachings and applications leads a church over the cliff to death and hell,correct?

  10. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    June 25th, 2012 at 19:30 | #10

    Joe, thank you for taking the time to read and reply with your feedback.

    Jude 3

  11. Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
    June 25th, 2012 at 19:30 | #11

    this is a leading question and I will answer it only when you get to the point

  12. Glenn S
    September 8th, 2012 at 04:28 | #12

    Here’s an Apologetic with Word & matter from the Treasury of Daily Prayer this morning.

    “For we see that in the New Testament, gospel proclamation is never alone. It is always accompanied with evidence: healing, miracles, the tangible and physical, etc. This should come as no surprise to hearers of the Word. After all, as Lewis reminds us, “God likes matter; He created it” (C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity).”

    Naaman Healed of Leprosy

    9†So Naaman came with his horses and chariots and stood at the door of Elisha’s house. 10†And Elisha sent a messenger to him, saying, “Go and wash in the Jordan seven times, and your flesh shall be restored, and you shall be clean.” 11†But Naaman was angry and went away, saying, “Behold, I thought that he would surely come out to me and stand and call upon the name of the LORD his God, and wave his hand over the place and cure the leper. 12†Are not Abana[1] and Pharpar, the rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel? Could I not wash in them and be clean?” So he turned and went away in a rage. 13†But his servants came near and said to him, “My father, it is a great word the prophet has spoken to you; will you not do it? Has he actually said to you, ‘Wash, and be clean’?” 14†So he went down and dipped himself seven times in the Jordan, according to the word of the man of God, and his flesh was restored like the flesh of a little child, and he was clean.

    Concordia Publishing House (2009-10-31). The Lutheran Study Bible (Kindle Locations 44309-44319). Concordia Publishing House. Kindle Edition.

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.