Update on ULC Eviction hearing
The past two days have been filled with courtrooms for ULC and the MNS District. The latest news is that each party has until 4 PM tomorrow to file any more briefs. The Judge may take until Monday to render judgment in the case.
A reminder to all of you that the Minnesota South District Convention is happening June 14th-16th. Pray for the delegates as it appears they will have to discuss these matters on the floor.
Delegates to the Convention – you may not agree with me on the ULC situation theologically or even politically – but please consider the case by plain reason. What was the purpose of the money raised to purchase the property? Was it to fund others or was it to fund ULC?
Who has caused this division? Does your District need more hurt and greater divisions? Who has refused to talk and be open? Who refused a higher offer (if this was about money, they made a bad choice financially)? Why was the higher offer refused (was it because ULC would have been allowed to stay and worship in a new facility)?
Just using your common sense reasoning – how does it look when a District has to evict one of its own congregations – which it is supposed to exist to serve (remember that congregations are the basis for Synod, Synod [and her Districts] serves congregations)?
Rules for comments on this site:
Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics. Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand. If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.
Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.
Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.
If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.
Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.
Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives. If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.
We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology. This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.