Grape Juice (Communion in One Kind — Part Two)

June 4th, 2012 Post by

Having been encouraged to study the Book of Concord (see my previous post), my Wednesday evening adult Bible class turned to Luther’s Small Catechism.

Beginning in the Preface, we found quite a bit to provoke discussion. I was surprised at the direction that this discussion took, when Luther made passing reference to the practice of ‘Communion in One Kind':

“O ye bishops! … You command the Sacrament in one form [but is not this the highest ungodliness coupled with the greatest impudence that you are insisting on the administration of the Sacrament in one form only, and on your traditions] and insist on your human laws, and yet at the same time you do not care in the least [while you are utterly without scruple and concern] whether the people know the Lord’s Prayer, the Creed, the Ten Commandments, or any part of the Word of God. Woe, woe, unto you forever!”

If you are a lifelong Lutheran, you probably read right through this passage. (You may have paused to shake your fist in disagreement against those Roman bishops.) Most of us don’t give ‘Communion in One Form’ (or Species or Kind) a serious second thought, because we don’t really see this as a problem that is taking place in our churches today. In our churches, all those who partake of the Sacrament are allowed to both eat and drink.

This topic, however, caught my Bible class’s attention. A number of participants in this class had formerly belonged to the Roman church. While they were in that church body, they had experienced this practice. Communicants were only given the Body of Christ to eat, while the Blood of Christ was reserved for someone else – usually, the priest.

As noted in Luther’s Preface, such a practice had also been taking place in the sixteenth century. In the Augsburg Confession, the Lutheran confessors addressed ‘Communion in One Kind’ as an abuse. Article XXII states that this practice goes against the clear command of Christ: “Drink ye, all of it.” It also argues that ‘Communion in One Kind’ goes against the practice of the church at the time of the Apostles (1 Corinthians 11:20 and following). The confessors wrote: “It is evident that such a custom [(Communion in One Kind)], introduced contrary to God’s command and also contrary to the ancient canons, is unjust. Accordingly, it is not proper to burden the consciences of those who desire to receive the sacrament according to Christ’s institution or compel them to act contrary to the arrangement of our Lord Christ” (Tappert, AC XXII:10-11).

The sixteenth century Lutherans opposed ‘Communion in One Kind’ because it violated ‘the arrangement of our Lord Christ’. They said that this practice was an intolerable change to our Lord’s institution of the Sacrament.

At this point, someone in my class asked: “What about those churches that use grape juice?”

This question opened my eyes to the fact that ‘Communion in One Kind’ is still a problem that we face today. Even among Lutheran Pastors and Congregations, you can find those who have changed our Lord’s institution and arrangement of His Supper: They substitute grape juice for wine. They usually attempt to justify this change, citing concern for those who either cannot or will not drink alcohol. Yet, these attempts at self-justification only serve to underscore the point: A change has been made. This substitution leaves the Sacrament being celebrated with only one of the kinds according to which our Lord Jesus instituted this Sacrament.

When the good of people of Minnesota North encouraged everyone to study the Book of Concord, I don’t know if they really knew what exactly they were encouraging. Yet, Pandora’s Box has been opened. Some of those who read this book will find it life-changing (see especially the video posted by Paul McCain in response to my last post). I hope and pray that our District-wide study of the Book of Concord will press us to ask hard questions about our own teaching and practice, that we will continue to examine ourselves as we strive to be faithful today.



Here is a paper that Pastor Curtis links to in comment # 4 below:

Rules for comments on this site:

Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.

Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.

Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.

If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.

Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.

Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.

We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. June 8th, 2012 at 14:56 | #1

    One does not give a person a wine glass with grape juice in it and ask “what do you think of this wine recipe?” Juice simply is NOT wine. Period. The church has always been united on this point. I have provided the documentation above. The elements are bread and wine, not rice cakes and juicy juice. As for this issue being “as irrelevant as women lectors” I suppose I would agree – women lectors are not adiaphora either!

    If the elements of rice wafers and grape juice are not contrary to Christ’s institution, not only should we offer them to those who are unable to tolerate gluten or alcohol, we should rather give grape juice and rice wafers to EVERYONE so as to simplify things and not provide offense.

  2. Frederick
    June 8th, 2012 at 18:06 | #2

    John Rixe I am listening and I’ll join you in gettin’ out of this! The power is in the word! And no, no one is going with rice cakes and juicy juice. Gluten free wagers are bread and yes grape juice is made from grapes and represents a sincere attempt to stay faithful! Take care folks – later!

  3. Jason
    June 8th, 2012 at 19:03 | #3

    Grape juice? Are we really trying for LOWEST common denominator? See ing how far we can push the edge, what we can get away with? Not trying to be faithful or do our best? Yes, sometimes it is worth a fight.

Comment pages
1 2 20075
If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.