40 Days Of What? Planned Parenthood Has 40 Days Of Prayer.

April 26th, 2012 Post by

According to Life News Dot Com, there was a recent Pro-Life 40 Days for Life campaign that resulted in saving the lives of more than 700 unborn children from abortion. Apparently a local Planned Parenthood business in California is doing something similar by have its own 40 Days of Prayer.  (Click here to read more on 40 Days of Prayer)

I appreciate the heartfelt tenderness of the Planned Parenthood business in their concern for women and their willingness to address the social injustices against woman.  Truly there are injustices enacted upon women that need to be addressed.  I am also impressed by the Planned Parenthood business’s desire to help educate individuals on the concerns and problems with STD’s.  All very good and very impressive.

The Planned Parenthood business, Six Rivers, also has the religious support of the Humboldt Clergy For Choice.  This group of clergy consider themselves to be, “religious leaders who value all human life. We accept that religions differ about when life begins. We are here to help. We believe that human life is holy. That’s why we believe in your right to choose to be a parent or not.”

Logo Taken From: www.faithaloud.org

While I am obviously Pro-Life as a Pastor and would disagree with this group of clergy, I would like to steer our conversation away from the typical talking points to this idea of being, “free to choose.”  From the Planned Parenthood material, the freedom of choice in pregnancy is obviously between abortion, adoption or parenting.  In fact the religious and ethical voice, “Faith Aloud,” considers all of these options to be, “good moral decisions.”  

In contemplating this freedom to choose I wonder if there is even such a thing as complete freedom of choice?  Are their boundaries and/or limitations in choice or not?  If there are boundaries and limitations in one’s choice, does this still make one’s choice completely free?  Furthermore, if there are boundaries and limitations, what are they and how do we define them?  In other words, how does one arrive at whether or not a choice is good or bad, what criteria is used?  As I previously pointed out, Faith Aloud arrived at the judgment that abortion was a “good” moral decision?   How did they arrive at this conclusion and what is it that makes abortion a good choice?  For something to be good, logically that means that there is something bad.  What would constitute a bad moral decision for people with reproductive choices? 

My concern is valid especially in the context of history.  You see, as individuals we value the freedom of choice.  As humans we want to make our own decisions and we typically make our decisions on our own criteria and what we think is important.  Take for instance life.  We assess the value of life based on criteria we think is important.  Rather than viewing the value of life from the perspective of the Creator, we view life through our perspective and frankly have not done so well with our criteria in determining life’s value.  Historically we have really messed this up.  Examine for a moment the comments from a sermon by Rev. James Lamb“We have used ethnicity as a basis for value and ended up with places like Auschwitz and Cambodia and Croatia and Rwanda…  We have used skin color as a basis for value and ended up with slave trading and civil war…  More and more we use health as a basis for value and end up with assisted suicide and euthanasia…”  Now we use criteria such as costs for the potential parents and that newborns are not capable of contributing to their existence as a basis for value.  As of late a disturbing article came out in the, “Journal for Medical Ethics,” stating the ethical reasoning,

“If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the fetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn.”

My point is that there is no such thing as a free choice, because all choices need to have and do have ethical limitations, otherwise the previous atrocities can’t be classified as morally wrong or ethically negative.  (i.e. moral relativism) Furthermore, ethical boundaries and limitations need to appeal to criteria greater than the individual making the choice otherwise the atrocities above can be morally neutral or ethically good according to the criteria of the person committing the atrocities.  

Prayer 41:  Today we pray for clarity in understanding ethical boundaries and limitations.  

Prayer 42:  Today we pray for eyes to look beyond our personal criteria to the Creator’s criteria for all of life’s choices.

Prayer 43: Today we thank God for Life, for Life is holy and precious.






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. helen
    April 26th, 2012 at 16:26 | #1

    Who is “Planned Parenthood” praying to?

    Surely not the GOD who gave the 10 commandments!

  2. Rev. David Mueller
    April 26th, 2012 at 17:43 | #2

    Helen, PP prays to the god of “your” choice, and most especially to the god that is “Your Choice”; the god offered to the first Parents in the Plan, Adam and Eve, by the Anti-planner, the Serpent.

    Planned Parenthood–the most racist organization in the country–considering the phenomenally disproportionate number of black children aborted under their auspices. Shouldn’t be any surprise, really, though, considering Margaret Sanger was an existentialist and eugenicist–a philosophical kissin’ cousin of Adolph the Austrian.

    As Win stated on another thread–or do you think I’m too understated here? :)

  3. Mrs. Hume
    April 26th, 2012 at 20:54 | #3

    Planned Parenthood has to address STD’s because a substantial fraction of their clientele are infected.

    http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/other/poverty.htm

    I mean what are they praying for? That sin won’t have consequences?

    They may as well pray against Newton’s three laws of motion.

    Planned Parenthood promotes and enables behaviors that lead to death and disease.

  4. Win
    April 27th, 2012 at 07:22 | #4

    Planned Parenthood’s Prayers will be heard and answered just as those prophets up on Mount Carmel had theirs answered. I love the King James:

    “And they…called on the name of Ba-al from morning even until noon, saying ‘O Ba-al, hear us.’ But there was no voice, nor any that answered…And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, ‘Cry aloud: for he is a god; either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awakened.’ And they cried aloud, and cut themselves after their manner with knives and lancets, till the blood gushed out upon them. And it came to pass, when midday ws past, and they prophesied until the time of the offerings of the evening sacrifice, that there was neither voice, nor any to answer, nor any that regarded.” 1 Kings 18:26b-29 KJV

    If I were PP, I’d be wary of employing ’40’ of anything….

  5. Our God Reigns
    April 27th, 2012 at 08:34 | #5

    There is absolutely nothing to commend Planned Parenthood for the Christian. There is nothing they do that cannot be done by a physician in an office or hospital. The Susan G Komen breast cancer debacle sends millions in grants to Planned Parenthood under the guise of giving low income women to have “health procedures” which again can all be done without the sin of abortion being their main goal I don’t know anyone who goes to an abortion mill to get a routine mammogram. Why would you? So there is NO reason to applaud PP for their evil ways

  6. Mrs. Hume
    April 27th, 2012 at 13:32 | #6

    “I don’t know anyone who goes to an abortion mill to get a routine mammogram.”

    Planned Parenthood does not do any mammograms.

    http://www.jillstanek.com/2011/02/cecile-richards-misleads-planned-parenthood-does-not-provide-mammograms/

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.