Can’t we just remove Illinois? Or maybe Iowa? LCMS, WELS, ELS

March 20th, 2011 Post by

 

A friend of mine in the ELS let me know a few weeks ago about a conference which deserves attention.  It is called the Emmaus Conference.  On May 5-6th this year in Tacoma, Washington the Presidents of the three major confessional Lutheran Synods (LCMS, WELS, and ELS) will be either lecturing (WELS) or reacting (LCMS, ELS).

You can view their website here.

It has been a number of years since these kind of things have been able to happen, but it is good to see the heads of these church bodies at least in the same room.  One of the things that was very valuable in the old days was the ability of one of the church bodies in the Synodical Conference to rebuke another.  The outside rebuke had greater weight than a lot of inside rebuke.

Only after the breakup of the Synodical Conference did special interest groups from within the LCMS begin to be the only voice for certain issues.  Their effectiveness is oftentimes related more to politics than to rebuke.  Before that, an entire Synod could call another to repentance over an issue of doctrine or the practices which flow out of it.

Each side of this has issues with the other:  LCMS will go after Church/Ministry of WELS and ELS; WELS and ELS will go after LCMS on a number of things (fellowship, women’s roles, scouting, military chaplaincy) and so forth [For a good summary of WELS issues with LCMS see John Brug’s book “WELS and other Lutherans, second edition”].  I will say that it would be an interesting future if each body gets serious about doctrinal discussion, especially since most of the pastors and many of the laity involved have never experienced the gift of the Synodical Conference.  The value of having so many other Lutherans calling others to repentance would be very good.  More than that, it is nice to see our Synod represented in the same conference with WELS and ELS instead of ELCA (or LCMC and NALC for that matter).

So this conference could be a good step along the way of working toward a greater confessional Lutheran association, or maybe not.

I would invite anyone who attends the conference in May to let me know about it at:   [email protected]

Of course, if the matter was only as easy as removing a state or two we could manage something, bringing these Synods together again is up to the Lord.

No offense was intended to the residents of Illinois or Iowa, nor the congregations of the

Northern Illinois, Central Illinois, and Southern Illinois, Iowa East, and Iowa West Districts in the titling of this article.






Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. helen
    March 21st, 2011 at 01:04 | #1

    Possibley the elephant in the room in this case is …………. texas?

  2. helen
    March 21st, 2011 at 01:06 | #2

    Possibly I shouldn’t post at 1 a.m.?

  3. Johannes
    March 21st, 2011 at 07:08 | #3

    I have no idea what this means. Would somebody please explain? I get the synod stuff, but not the state stuff.

    Johannes

  4. March 21st, 2011 at 07:19 | #4

    Johannes :
    I have no idea what this means. Would somebody please explain? I get the synod stuff, but not the state stuff.
    Johannes

    Not sure, but I would venture to guess the following. Since each of the three synods have headquarters in Missouri, Wisconsin, and Minnesota (ELS) and Iowa and Illinois are geographically between them, the author is alluding to those states as being stumbling blocks to relations and doctrine between them, metaphorically of course.

  5. Johannes
    March 21st, 2011 at 07:36 | #5

    @Perry Lund #4

    Uh-huh.

    Thanks (I think!)
    Johannes

  6. Pastor Joshua Scheer
    March 21st, 2011 at 08:58 | #6

    @Perry Lund #4
    Thanks Perry for explaining it. Sometimes a pastor’s humor is just a little too dry. Seriously this is about the relationship between the confessional lutherans of old beginning to get better. I am not sure if it will ever manifest in fellowship (that is God’s work), but it can’t hurt to be spending more time with them than the other lutherans out there.

  7. Carl Vehse
    March 21st, 2011 at 09:38 | #7

    Will anyone from the ACELC be attending the Emmaus Conference?

  8. March 21st, 2011 at 10:18 | #8

    I’m not from the ACELC (although I very much appreciate their efforts and their doctrinal stance), but I am registered for the Emmaus Conference, and really looking forward to it.

  9. James
    March 21st, 2011 at 10:37 | #9

    I would like to see them accuse each other of being the biggest promotor of false Church Growth theology.

  10. helen
    March 21st, 2011 at 10:40 | #10

    One might hope they would, Carl, as individuals, not as organizational reps.
    I am looking forward to hearing more about this. I’m glad lcms is going to be represented!

  11. GaiusKurios
    March 21st, 2011 at 12:42 | #11

    It is refreshing to have dialog with WELS and ELS instead of the E?CA. Did anything fruitful ever come from all the dialogs with the E?CA? If it did I sure missed what it might have been.

  12. Carl Vehse
    March 21st, 2011 at 12:53 | #12

    “Did anything fruitful ever come from all the dialogs with the E?CA?”

    Don’t know. People haven’t posted anything new lately on this BJS thread.

  13. Dutch
    March 21st, 2011 at 13:27 | #13

    Would it be fabulous to have WELS & LCMS in open/ public dialogue, of any kind? Most certainly, more fruitful & valuable, than El~A or the up & coming ACNA/LCMS public forums.

    It is about time, many have waited decades to see, even anything remotely like this.

    Look forward to updates on this conference. Many at BJS, represent both LCMS & WELS, if we can do it here, one would think….

  14. Pastor Luke Boehringer
    March 21st, 2011 at 14:13 | #14

    I hope the example of our synod presidents will encourage more free conferences among us. Perhaps even in Iowa.

  15. David Garner
    March 21st, 2011 at 14:41 | #15

    As a former LCMS and former WELS parishioner, I have to say the recently elected Presidents of both Synods give reason for hope. I am unfamiliar with Pres. Molstad, but I’ve met President Schroeder and heard him speak, and certainly at the time we were in WELS held high hopes for his Presidency. Even though we ultimately left Lutheranism altogether, I pray such discussions will bear much fruit.

  16. mames
    March 21st, 2011 at 16:19 | #16

    Given the state of the LCMS right now my wife and I have visited the WELS congregation in our area. The Pastor there is up front about our differences, in other words HONEST, and seems to be a highly effective Pastor in and out of the pulpit. When we need a little injection of real liturgy we make a visit. We just cant get past the exclusiviity of social ministry and the whole fellowship definition although it is easy to see what being too open has done to us.

  17. David Moseley
    March 21st, 2011 at 18:58 | #17

    When you say “reactor” what do you mean by that designation? Sorry if I sound less than educated, I’m just knew to this. And I think this is great that they are all getting together.

  18. March 21st, 2011 at 19:16 | #18

    The Emmaus Conference has been going on for a few years at least. If I understand correctly, there’s usually one paper/essay that is presented by someone from ELS, LCMS or WELS, and then each of the other synods has a representative who “reacts” to the main presentation, that is, critiques it. Often the presenters/reactors are seminary profs. This is the first year that it’s the three presidents. I believe the main presentation this year (by Pres. Schroeder) will be on the matter of “fellowship.”

  19. Lloyd I. Cadle
    March 21st, 2011 at 21:32 | #19

    If Kieschnick was still the LCMS president, I don’t think that this meeting would take place. It makes a big difference to have President Harrison leading the LCMS.

    At least the three presidents are strong confessional Lutherans. That is a great start!

  20. Lloyd I. Cadle
    March 21st, 2011 at 21:48 | #20

    James #9:

    Neither President Schroeder nor President Harrison are going to point their fingers at each other with blame for the CG movement.

    Both men view CG as a threat to the church. Both men are humble enough to want to put a stop to it. Both SP’s know that complacency is what leads to church growth.

    Many of us will be in prayer during the meetings.

  21. Rev. Roger D. Sterle
    March 22nd, 2011 at 07:29 | #21

    @David Moseley #17
    Someone who reacts to the paper with comments.

  22. helen
    March 22nd, 2011 at 10:07 | #22

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #20
    Both SP’s know that complacency is what leads to church growth.

    Somehow, I don’t think that’s exactly what you meant?

    Complacency may allow the CG movement to take root, as planting a garden and not tending it allows weeds to take over. It doesn’t help real growth.

  23. Rev. David Mueller
    March 22nd, 2011 at 11:44 | #23

    @helen #1
    Oh, please! Don’t refer to Texas as an *elephant*! Those Texans already have a thing about the size of their state! :)

    Did my vicarage there and loved it, btw. Truly enjoyed the state, along with having a great vicarage. Glad to be a Hoosier, though.

  24. helen
    March 22nd, 2011 at 13:39 | #24

    @Rev. David Mueller #23

    The state of Texas is not an issue in this discussion, David.

    I suppose its oversize ego does carry over to the natives in Texas district lcms. :(
    As does its schizo reputation as a homeground of Baptists… and a tribe of hard drinkers!
    [You’d have to be one or the other to swallow some of the programs imported here.] :(((

  25. Lloyd I. Cadle
    March 22nd, 2011 at 15:59 | #25

    @helen #22
    Complacency leads to CG, and it allows it to prosper (along with many other factors).

  26. March 22nd, 2011 at 22:33 | #26

    Not that every one here wouldn’t have, but it does not hurt to verbalize a conscious call that we all pray for this conference.

  27. helen
    March 23rd, 2011 at 17:01 | #27

    @Lloyd I. Cadle #25
    Complacency gets us into all sorts of trouble, I agree.

    My point was that when you used church growth in small letters, I assumed you meant real growth of congregations. I don’t believe complacency (or CG) leads to real growth, numerically or spiritually.

    @T. R. Halvorson #26
    Amen to that.

  28. CJ
    March 27th, 2011 at 19:47 | #28

    @helen #24

    Helen, I bring this to you as a poor, miserable sinner, convinced of the mercy that is mine through Christ Jesus alone:

    Wow. Do you not see how offensive that is?

    Perhaps the better question is…how could you not? You just stereotyped almost 25,000,000 people as ignorant alcoholic egolomaniacs.

    Regardless of your own “observations,” there is no room in Christ’s kingdom for such insults.

  29. Nathan92
    March 29th, 2011 at 08:39 | #29

    One thing I don’t understand about us is that we conservatives in the LCMS seem to approve WELS (and ELS), at least somewhat, as confessional Lutherans. I know they believe in a “quia” subscription, but they still teach false doctrine, don’t they? I know the ELCA is much farther from us theologically (to put it mildly), but doesn’t a little leaven work its way through all the dough? Should we not be just as concerned about WELS’s false doctrine concerning ministry and Christian fellowship, and their legalism concerning women’s suffrage in the church?

    The teachers in WELS and ELS, from what I understand, are schismatics at best, and false teachers at worst. Yet we seem a lot more willing to be kissing cousins with them just because we’re closer to them theologically. Jesus was very close to the Pharisees theologically, but He railed against them more than any other group for their legalism; He didn’t just say “Oh, unlike the Sadducees, these guys believe in both the Torah AND the Prophets, and they believe in the resurrection of the dead. They aren’t perfect, but I like them.” Instead, He rebuked them repeatedly and told people to be on their guard against them.

    Maybe this isn’t the right thread to bring this up, and maybe I just don’t see the cases where we have actually rebuked them and warned others against their false doctrine. Yet from what I’ve seen here, we seem all too eager to align with them against all the liberal forces in Christendom.

  30. March 29th, 2011 at 10:32 | #30

    @Nathan92 #29
    I really am glad you asked this question, and I hope there are still regular BJS readers who are following this thread and will answer. As a WELS pastor who speaks highly of the LCMS (at least one version of it), I hear the same question from fellow WELS members. “How can you talk about dialogue with a church body that sanctions working together with the ELCA and allows women not only to exercise authority over men with their votes in the congregation, but by being elders and presidents of the congregation?”

    Two quick comments: First, I think you’ll find that WELS official doctrine does not deviate in any way from Walther’s doctrine. His theses on church and ministry were accepted long ago by the WELS, and his theses on church fellowship were the very thing that brought the WELS and the LCMS together back in the 1870’s. The WELS doctrine on the roles of men and women is the same as the pre-1960’s LCMS doctrine.

    This is not to imply that false statements, wrong practices and legalistic applications haven’t been made (and even sanctioned!) over the years. They surely have. The Church Growth movement (along with a spirit of pietism in general) has also caused a general decline in theological interest and acuity, a problem which infects both our synods. But it might be argued that the WELS, at least officially, has not moved as far from Walther’s LCMS as the LCMS itself has.

    Second, I don’t find anyone suggesting that we should just open up the Communion rails this Sunday and pretend that we are already in fellowship with one another. What I do find on the part of many here and in the WELS is a serious desire to get our doctrine straight and in line with confessional Lutheranism (i.e., with the Scripture and the Church catholic). What I do find is a fervent desire to engage more seriously in dialogue regarding the articles of doctrine over which we have had disagreements in the past. Perhaps, with a good dose of Christian humility on both sides, we will both find our way back to the unity of the Synodical Conference.

  31. helen
    March 29th, 2011 at 10:56 | #31

    @CJ #28
    Wow. Do you not see how offensive that is?

    Wow! That did need some emoticons, didn’t it!?

    First, there is no denying that we are mostly a Baptist state. Count the churches, and look at the size of them. [We’ve got some beautiful Catholic & Lutheran churches a century old, too]

    Second, I don’t really believe the “hard drinking” slur on the whole. There are some I know, among Lutherans, also, who are reputed to overdo it but they don’t predominate and they get a certain amount of “concern” from their friends.

    Third, I didn’t characterize 25 million as anything… only the ones who swallowed some of the “programs” I’ve seen pedaled in the last 20 years. (Goodness, make that almost 40! Seminex was the first that caught my attention.) I doubt most of the 25 million down here even noticed, even if they were lcms, perhaps! :( [Lcms only has 3.5 million altogether; they usually credit Texas with 10% of that.]

    And, incidentally, egomaniac looks better w/o the ‘lo’ and you said that; I didn’t.
    [I may have been tempted to think it about just a few, I admit.]

    “WE’RE TEXAS” does take a bit of ego (and I’m one of ‘em, but not to maniac level). :)

  32. CJ
    March 29th, 2011 at 12:09 | #32

    @ Helen:

    1. The majority of a state cannot speak for the whole. Plain and simple.

    2. Whether or not you believe does not negate the fact that you said it.

    3. And yes, you did stereotype 25 million people as something. You can’t pretend that you didn’t. It’s right there, on the page.

    4. If I misspoke by using ‘egolomaniac’ rather than ‘egomaniac,’ I think you still understood my intention to draw attention to the fact that YOU were the one that made that leap.

    5. “We’re Texas” is also not a state-wide thing. “Don’t Mess With Texas,” perhaps, but “We’re Texas” is a motto from UT. Surely you know that, if you are one of us.

  33. helen
    March 29th, 2011 at 14:55 | #33

    @CJ #32

    5. I am sitting here in PCL, with tickets to a UT baseball game (which may give way to a thunderstorm). :( I commented on “We’re Texas” precisely because it sounds like “everybody” but in fact refers to this university. :|

    In the same way, the “programs” of LCMS are not a concern of most Texans so there is no point in saying I mischaracterized 25 million people!

    Neither UT nor LCMS is anything like “the majority” …. we may have more illegal aliens (S’cuse me, “undocumented workers”) than Lutherans of any stripe in Texas.

    “I know that you believe you understand what you think I said,
    but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.”

    Now, come down off your high horse, Texan! :)

    Helen E. Jensen, MLIS
    Perry-Castaneda Library
    University of Texas at Austin

  34. helen
    March 29th, 2011 at 21:26 | #34

    BTW: Heaven graciously permitted a baseball game w/o a rain delay. It “misted” a little but no thunderstorm tonite. UT took it in 9 inninings, 2-1.

    Good night! God bless! –helen

  35. helen
    March 29th, 2011 at 21:29 | #35

    BTW: Heaven graciously permitted a baseball game w/o a rain delay. It “misted” a little but no thunderstorm tonite. UT took it in 9 innings, 2-1.

    Good night! God bless! –helen

    Gracious, you’re catching!

  36. Lloyd I. Cadle
    March 30th, 2011 at 13:33 | #36

    @Rev. Paul Rydecki #30

    Well said. A lot can be accomplished with that attitude, humility and respect that the leaders in both synods will have for the other synod.

  37. Dutch
    March 31st, 2011 at 15:29 | #37

    Pastor Rydecki #30,
    Oh thank you so much for that post! You wrote, exactly my hope for the Emmaus conference. It is my prayer, we see something on Emmaus on BJS.
    I pray if laity, is allowed to attend, those who live in that state or area attend (shout out to Jim P) and will we see something on I.L.?

    A LCMS/WELS Hybrid,
    Dutch

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.