Did Luther Endorse “Bar” Music for the Church?

September 8th, 2010 Post by

Editor’s Note: Over on another string Ron Beck asked a great question about Luther and his musical reforms (comment #79). He asked:

I need your help. Will you explain for me the myth or the history about Luther using bar tunes for hymnody.

On that same string a reply came in, responded with the following helpful answer that puts this myth to rest once and for all.

Ron, here’s a very good answer to your question from Rev. Peter Berg, who posted this on the old “Motley Magpie” site a few years ago:

Myth: Luther used bar songs in his hymnody. Ergo it’s permissible, even advantageous, to use popular forms of music in the church today. (Note: One of our esteemed editors recently visited the web site of a WELS congregation where the church’s CCM group justified its existence based on the “fact” that Luther used bar songs.)

 Truth: Luther did not use bar songs but rather his own creations and the musical heritage of the church catholic. The term bar refers to the type of staff notation used in medieval musical composing*. Luther did wed one sacred text to a popular tune**but later regretted this dalliance with love ballads. The relatively new academic discipline called Sentics has demonstrated that music can independently generate two very different reactions and emotions, termed Dionysian and Apollonian. The first is emotive and turns one inward. It is self-gratifying and clearly anthropocentric. The second, while not denying the emotional impact of music, maintains control and gives room for the intellectual processing of the truth of the text. In the first type, the music dominates the text. In the second, the music is in service to the text.  Christian Contemporary Music, a bad clone of popular music, is clearly Dionysian. Luther called Dionysian music “carnal” and he wrote his music to wean people away from the love ballads of his day.

And now let me add two comments:

*The musical notation was simply a repeat sign, known in Luther’s day as a “bar”. Yes, believe it or not, some wacky American Lutherans saw Luther’s reference to “barred music” in German and changed the repeat sign into a pub!  Why did Luther write positively about “bar(red) music”?  Because it describes the musical form A A B.  He thought that the repetition of the music of the first phrase would help in learning, and then the B phrase would give the balance of variety.  Hence, many chorales are written in this way.  The reason “bars” were used for notating this form was  used to save ink & paper.  Today we simply call these “repeat signs”.  You see this even in 19th and early 20th-century hymnals: the music for the first line ends with a repeat sign, and then the second verse of the first stanza is written in.

Example:

First line of music (A)
Salvation unto us has come, by God’s free grace and favor (repeat sign)
Good works cannot avert our doom, they help and save us never.

SECOND line of music (B)
Faith looks to Jesus Christ alone, who did for all the world atone; He is our one Redeemer.

**The one instance to which Rev. Berg refers is “From Heaven Above to Earth I Come”.  It is critical to note that this exception proves the rule: the tune we sing to “From Heaven Above” (VON HIMMEL HOCH) is NOT the popular ballad Luther first used, but a “more churchly tune” of his construction that he wrote AFTER he realized that his hymn was going to be used in the church.   What happened was this:  he wrote the hymn as a Christmas gift for his children, using a tune that was a popular “guessing game” song used by masked suitors of the day.  The clever trick: change the “guessing game” from “who is courting you” to an angel playing the game of “Whose is this advent of which I proclaim?”  So it made sense to use the popular tune.  However, when others began singing the hymn, he quickly wrote, in his words, “a more churchly tune”, so that it would be musically appropriate for the Divine Service.


Categories: zzz homepage DO NOT USE Tags:




Rules for comments on this site:


Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics.  Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand.  If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.


Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.


Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example.  If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.


If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.


Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.


Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives.  If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.


We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology.  This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.

  1. September 8th, 2010 at 08:10 | #1

    I see a parallel between music supporting or dominating the text and the ministerial or magisterial use of reason. Consistent let us be!

  2. Carl Vehse
    September 8th, 2010 at 10:01 | #2

    … the following helpful answer that puts this myth to rest once and for all.

    It is certainly helpful, but I doubt it will put the myth to rest once and for all.

    There are posts on the Wittenberg List Archive going back to at least August 1996 pointing out the difference between the musical meaning of “bar” and the tavern meaning.

  3. Johannes
    September 8th, 2010 at 10:04 | #3

    The bogus quote ascribed to Luther is, “Why should the devil get [or keep] all the good tunes?” I haven’t done the research myself, but apparently, nobody has found that quote in his writing. I’m out on a limb here, but willing to take my chances.

    The problem with using these [bar or whatever] tunes is that the medium becomes the message.

    Johannnes

  4. September 8th, 2010 at 10:22 | #4

    Cantor Magness, if you’re taking questions, would you mind giving the reference for Luther’s explanation of the second tune as a “more churchly tune”? That might come in handy.

  5. wrl
    September 8th, 2010 at 10:23 | #5

    @Johannes #3

    I’ve looked for the “Why should the devil have all the good art?” quote by Luther…and can’t find it either. Perhaps it’s a variation on the good tunes quote…

  6. mwe
    September 8th, 2010 at 11:56 | #6

    That quote is also sometimes attributed to William Booth of the Salvation Army.

  7. September 8th, 2010 at 12:02 | #7

    @Carl Vehse #2
    Sadly a myth has a way of becoming truth by default.

  8. Joe Olson
    September 8th, 2010 at 12:37 | #8

    There is a great DVD on the Lutheran hymnody narrated by the Cantor from Fort Wayne that spends sometime on this myth. It gives the history of the hymnody and asserts that the myth is a myth. It is well done and worth watching.

  9. Daniel Zager
    September 8th, 2010 at 12:44 | #9

    Both melodies for “Vom Himmel hoch” are found on page 17 of Robin A. Leaver, Luther’s Liturgical Music: Principles and Implications (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2007). Leaver’s section entitled “The ‘Secular’ Music Mythology” extends from pages 12-18 and is very helpful. In fact, the whole book is great reading–filled with insights and hugely relevant to current debates on worship and music in the twenty-first-century Lutheran church.

    Dan Zager
    Eastman School of Music

  10. Mrs. Hume
    September 8th, 2010 at 13:03 | #10

    @Joe Olson #8

    Could you post a link, Joe?

  11. helen
    September 8th, 2010 at 13:20 | #11

    @Mrs. Hume #9

    There is a great DVD on the Lutheran hymnody narrated by the Cantor from Fort Wayne that spends sometime on this myth.

    Contact Good Shepherd Institute, which published them, to obtain Kantor Resch’s DVD or a CD.

    http://www.goodshepherdinstitute.org/index.php?page=home

  12. Darren
    September 9th, 2010 at 09:43 | #12

    “Why should the devil get [or keep] all the good tunes?”

    I always thought that was a Geoff Moore quote:

    http://espanol.video.yahoo.com/watch/2846270/v2145017

  13. Joe Olson
    September 9th, 2010 at 13:51 | #13

    Mrs. Hume – helen is right it, it was published by the Good Shepherd Institute. Here is a link to the DVD – its called Singing the Faith:

    http://www.goodshepherdinstitute.org/index.php?page=singingfaith&PHPSESSID=5bdc52d3839abe2eeda6514c10e6031c

    We watched it in during the adult instruction hour over the course of a few weeks. It was a good thing to do.

  14. krusty
    September 9th, 2010 at 14:31 | #14

    I think that Martin Luther may be ashamed with just how dogmatic and inflexible some Lutherans have become with church music.

  15. Carl Vehse
    September 9th, 2010 at 15:38 | #15

    Well, with President Harrison as the new SP, you should not be surprised to hear one of these piped into the elevator speaker as you ride up to his office floor:

    I’m Ready to Go
    Daniel Prayed”
    Crying Holy Unto My Lord“\
    A Mighty Fortress with Bluegrass Variations

  16. MPC
    September 9th, 2010 at 23:09 | #16

    Dr. Joseph Herl, Worship Wars in Early Lutheranism, p. 21 “Most often, when Luther wrote a hymn using a preexisting melody, the melody was a Gregorian chant.”

    Dr Herl points out that Luther based some hymns on popular religious songs and one hymn on a secular song (not a drinking song.)

    Ibid., p. 22 “Many of the models for these hymns had already been sung in churches before Luther’s time. In making use of the models, Luther was continuing a tradition, not breaking new ground. There is in any case no justification for the argument that Luther attempted to promote congregational singing by catering to the tastes of the masses.”

    Dr Herl is chair of the music department at Concordia Univeristy-Nebraska.

  17. Rev. David Mueller
    September 10th, 2010 at 16:16 | #17

    How timely. I was just chatting with an E. Free pastor (raised Episcopalian, went through their charismatic movement), and he brought out this old canard about the “bar song.” I explained that “bar song” doesn’t mean saloon song, but it’s a reference to how the music was structured. He didn’t buy it. Funny, isn’t it. The E. Free guy doesn’t listen to a (collared and clearly “old-fashioned”, history-oriented) *Lutheran* about what *Luther* said or did.
    Went on to talk about how the music doesn’t matter.

    Where to begin with this!

    Hmm. Maybe I’ll just copy and paste this onto a Word doc and pass it along?

  18. Rev. David Mueller
    September 10th, 2010 at 16:20 | #18

    And, krusty, the basis for your statement about what Luther would be ashamed of, taken from what Luther actually said and did regarding church music, is….?

  19. Daniel Zager
    September 11th, 2010 at 13:01 | #19

    @Rev. David Mueller #17
    ” . . . the music doesn’t matter.” The proposition that the music doesn’t matter, that it’s the words–and only the words–that count, has been advanced with some frequency during the worship and music debates of the last three decades. Interesting that almost no one would advance that proposition outside of the church and its music. Think about music in advertising, music as composed and scored for films and television, processional music at secular ceremonies such as graduations. People often think very carefully about what music to use in those contexts–not just anything would do. But in the case of music for the church we hear that “the music doesn’t matter.” That is nonsense, of course, and Lutheran church musicians have long been well positioned to choose music purposefully, music that plays its part in proclaiming the Gospel. For Lutheran church musicians not just anything will do–the music matters.

  20. Grendel007
    January 21st, 2014 at 09:17 | #20

    Christians overseas lose their lives and churches. Christians at home are losing their businesses and homes because they won’t take photos and bake cakes. God is being driven into a closet by government and society. And MUSIC in church is what we argue about? Thank heaven God wins in the end because leaving it up to you people would spell certain doom. Congrats on your little drum circle.

  21. Debbie Martin
    January 21st, 2014 at 15:56 | #21

    I think at one time the only kind of music they used in the Catholic church was Gregorian Chant, and the sheet music for that looks very different from our music today. What is called a bar in music has nothing to do with drinking taverns, lol.

  22. Jais Tinglund
    January 22nd, 2014 at 08:12 | #22

    Grendel007 :
    Christians overseas lose their lives and churches. Christians at home are losing their businesses and homes because they won’t take photos and bake cakes. God is being driven into a closet by government and society. And MUSIC in church is what we argue about? Thank heaven God wins in the end because leaving it up to you people would spell certain doom. Congrats on your little drum circle.

    … while others spend their time and spiritual energy in much more beneficial and Christian ways – such as digging up three year old debate threads to post sarcastic comments about those who think that worship matters matter.
    Good thing that there are people doing that – for obviously that would be how God wins in the end, as you say, and not because of stupid people wasting their time doing less important things on the internet …

    O, wait a minute – Nah, never mind …

  23. Tom M.
    January 24th, 2014 at 20:01 | #23

    I don’t care if this story about Luther is true or not. Music, in and of itself, is not clean or unclean, sacred or secular. The idea that certain forms of music are off-limits to the church is patently absurd. Just because a secular artist first uses a form of music does not forever attach said form of music to the “world” and thus render it unusable for the church. If God can (and did) redeem humanity, why do people believe that forms of music are unredeemable? See I Tim. 4:4-5 for a pretty clear direction on this (and many other issues).

If you have problems commenting on this site, or need to change a comment after it has been posted on the site, please contact us. For help with getting your comment formatted, click here.
Subscribe to comments feed  ..  Subscribe to comments feed for this post
Anonymous comments are welcome on this board, but we do require a valid email address so the admins can verify who you are. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. Email addresses are kept private on this site, and only available to the site admins. Comments posted without a valid email address may not be published. Want an icon to identify your comment? See this page to see how.
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.