The ultimate “wedge issue”
Of all the proposals from the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance, one of the most disliked is the one that would give larger congregations more votes. Well, I’m not really sure why the Blue Ribbon Task Force proposed it considering that their consultants told them it would go over like a lead balloon. It’s funny because the consultants clearly have no understanding of the theological basis for a congregational model of Synodical organization. But they’re smart enough to know that people really, really, really don’t like the idea. Here’s what they say under the section “Giving Larger Congregations a Greater Voice” on page 79:
Diminishing their vote in Synod deliberations is the clearest and potentially most troubling of such symbols. If ever there were what politicians call a “wedge issue” for the LCMS, this is it.
So why did the BRTFSSG include the recommendation? I don’t know. But it’s yet another example of how the task force disregarded the information they spent $500,000 to get.
Read 640 times
Rules for comments on this site:
Engage the contents and substance of the post. Rabbit trails and side issues do not help the discussion of the topics. Our authors work hard to write these articles and it is a disservice to them to distract from the topic at hand. If you have a topic you think is important to have an article or discussion on, we invite you to submit a request through the "Ask a Pastor" link or submit a guest article.
Provide a valid email address. If you’re unwilling to do this, we are unwilling to let you comment.
Provide at least your first name. Please try to come up with a unique name; if you have a common name add something to it so you aren't confused with another user. We have several "john"'s already for example. If you have a good reason to use a fake name, please do so but realize that the administrators of the site expect a valid email address and also reserve the right to ask you for your name privately at any time.
If you post as more than one person from the same IP address, we’ll block that address.
Do not engage in ad hominem arguments. We will delete such comments, and will not be obligated to respond to any complaints (public or private ones) about deleting your comments.
Interaction between people leaving comments ought to reflect Christian virtue, interaction that is gracious and respectful, not judging motives. If error is to be rebuked, evidence of the error ought to be provided.
We reserve the right to identify and deal with trollish behavior as we see fit and without apology. This may include warnings (public or private ones) or banning.