What is a Baby?

Charlton Heston in "Soylent Green"In the course of discussing the ethics of abortion, there’s a question I’ve found to be helpful in framing the Christian viewpoint, and it’s simply this: What is a baby? Of course, we all know a baby is a young human being, but there seem to be, broadly speaking, two ways to answer this question:

1. A baby is a breather of air, drinker of water, producer of waste, consumer of energy, and competitor for resources, one more on a planet of billions of other breathers, drinkers, producers, consumers, and competitors.

2. A baby is a unique creation, a fully-human being, with intrinsic value that cannot be measured or weighed, a possessor of numerous rights which are afforded him by mere virtue of his humanity, the highest order of creation and steward of it, and a member of the race into which the Son of God Himself was born and which He redeemed by His death and resurrection.

How one answers the question “What is a baby?” will direct his moral thought on issues such as abortion and infanticide, but will even shape his view of birth control, the family, population control, and a host of other ethical questions, even those such as euthanasia and palliative care at the end of life. We Christians should be addressing these questions from the latter of these two viewpoints.

The first viewpoint is well characterized by much of the bad science fiction of the 1970s, but also from related concepts such as Zero Population Growth. How we see each new baby will influence our positions on the ethical implications of that life.

If one sees a baby as just another mouth for this overcrowded earth to feed, he’s obviously going to be less likely to defend the baby’s life against policies which might threaten it. When, for example, we Christians speak of abortion as a form of murder — and we should — we might also do well to speak consistently about exactly what sort of human being is being murdered. The baby still within his mother’s womb is a distinct and unique human being, endowed with certain rights to his own life, beloved by God, etc.

On the other hand, the world will often see life issues according to the first viewpoint. It’s difficult to argue against abortion when the world sees even the baby who has been born as just another parasite on Mother Earth. In my experience, the first work to do when discussing these sorts of issues is to put forth the intrinsic value of each human life before delving into some of the more complex questions.

About Pastor Daniel Hinton

Pastor Hinton is associate pastor of Trinity Lutheran Church in Cheyenne, Wyoming. He is a graduate of the University of Arkansas, having majored in poultry science, and of Concordia Theological Seminary in Fort Wayne, Indiana. He was ordained on Holy Trinity 2011. He has been married to Amanda for ten years, and has three daughters (Elizabeth, Anastasia, and Isabella). He grew up in the ELCA, and left in 2004 over issues of scriptural authority. It was because of a faithful Lutheran campus ministry that he was exposed to The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod. Much of his ministry at Trinity involves the instruction of the 117 students at Trinity Lutheran School, which has been open since 1892 and now uses a classical model of instruction. He will be writing on situations around “Steadfast in School” and “Steadfast among Others”.

Comments

What is a Baby? — 4 Comments

  1. How we view babies also plays a role in our thoughts on artificial reproduction treatments. This morning a friend shared a recent article from the NYTimes about the FDA’s consideration of a fertility treatment that uses genetic material from 3 individuals. (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/26/health/fda-meeting-considers-controversial-fertility-procedure.html)

    The one thing I would add to the second view as stated above is acknowledgement of the creator of each human being.

  2. Two other things that get corrupted by the first worldview: reproductive rights and Original Sin.

    People have the right to reproduce and government should not get in the way of that. However, a new human being – at any stage of development – is the result of reproduction, so claims that reproductive rights are limited by abolishing abortion are absurd. It’s not a question of reproductive rights, but what right one has to kill the result of reproduction.

    The Progressive mentality also doesn’t acknowledge that a baby is conceived corrupt and sinful and in need of the Savior, but holds that all people are generally good and only corrupted by external circumstances. This affects their view of rape conception, that it is OK to abort a rape baby because that child has already started with a bad nature, unlike non-rape babies which don’t start with bad nature. Of course, the Christian view holds that all of us inherit a sinful nature regardless of whether our conception was consensual or criminal.

  3. Good stuff, Daniel. We are looking forward to meeting one more competitor for Mother Earth’s resources in a few days here. What should we name it if it’s a boy?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.